147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21854873)
1. Design and development of a mobile computer application to reengineer workflows in the hospital and the methodology to evaluate its effectiveness.
Holzinger A; Kosec P; Schwantzer G; Debevc M; Hofmann-Wellenhof R; Frühauf J
J Biomed Inform; 2011 Dec; 44(6):968-77. PubMed ID: 21854873
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Qualitative and quantitative evaluation of EHR-integrated mobile patient questionnaires regarding usability and cost-efficiency.
Fritz F; Balhorn S; Riek M; Breil B; Dugas M
Int J Med Inform; 2012 May; 81(5):303-13. PubMed ID: 22236957
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Documentation and coding of ED patient encounters: an evaluation of the accuracy of an electronic medical record.
Silfen E
Am J Emerg Med; 2006 Oct; 24(6):664-78. PubMed ID: 16984834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Usability of a barcode scanning system as a means of data entry on a PDA for self-report health outcome questionnaires: a pilot study in individuals over 60 years of age.
Boissy P; Jacobs K; Roy SH
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak; 2006 Dec; 6():42. PubMed ID: 17184533
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The use of portable computer for information acquirement during anesthesiologist's ward round in acute pain service.
Lee YL; Wu JL; Wu HS; Yang SF; Hsu SC; Tsai CC; Ku TH
Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan; 2007 Jun; 45(2):79-87. PubMed ID: 17694683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Integration of a handheld based anaesthesia rounding system into an anaesthesia information management system.
Fuchs C; Quinzio L; Benson M; Michel A; Röhrig R; Quinzio B; Hempelmann G
Int J Med Inform; 2006 Jul; 75(7):553-63. PubMed ID: 16263327
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Examining nursing vital signs documentation workflow: barriers and opportunities in general internal medicine units.
Yeung MS; Lapinsky SE; Granton JT; Doran DM; Cafazzo JA
J Clin Nurs; 2012 Apr; 21(7-8):975-82. PubMed ID: 22243491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of the quality and timeliness of vital signs data using three different data-entry devices.
Wager KA; Schaffner MJ; Foulois B; Swanson Kazley A; Parker C; Walo H
Comput Inform Nurs; 2010; 28(4):205-12. PubMed ID: 20571371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Paper versus computer: feasibility of an electronic medical record in general pediatrics.
Roukema J; Los RK; Bleeker SE; van Ginneken AM; van der Lei J; Moll HA
Pediatrics; 2006 Jan; 117(1):15-21. PubMed ID: 16396855
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Socio-technical considerations in epilepsy electronic patient record implementation.
Mc Quaid L; Breen P; Grimson J; Normand C; Dunne M; Delanty N; Kalra D; Fitzsimons M
Int J Med Inform; 2010 May; 79(5):349-60. PubMed ID: 20181511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The Clinical Document Architecture (CDA) enables electronic medical records to wireless mobile computing.
Müller M; Frankewitsch T; Ganslandt T; Bürkle T; Prokosch HU
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2004; 107(Pt 2):1448-52. PubMed ID: 15361055
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Establishing a clinical information system for surgical ophthalmology and orthopedics specialties with reference to GSG '93].
Dick B; Basad E
Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1996 Apr; 208(4):254-61. PubMed ID: 8778498
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Optimized documentation entry in emergency care using pen computers--initial results].
Ellinger K; Luiz T; Obenauer P
Anasthesiol Intensivmed Notfallmed Schmerzther; 1997 Aug; 32(8):488-95. PubMed ID: 9376464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Handheld computers for survey and trial data collection in resource-poor settings: development and evaluation of PDACT, a Palm Pilot interviewing system.
Seebregts CJ; Zwarenstein M; Mathews C; Fairall L; Flisher AJ; Seebregts C; Mukoma W; Klepp KI
Int J Med Inform; 2009 Nov; 78(11):721-31. PubMed ID: 19157967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Does single-source create an added value? Evaluating the impact of introducing x4T into the clinical routine on workflow modifications, data quality and cost-benefit.
Bruland P; Forster C; Breil B; Ständer S; Dugas M; Fritz F
Int J Med Inform; 2014 Dec; 83(12):915-28. PubMed ID: 25220487
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Seven years experience with a computerized diabetes clinic database.
Flack JR
Medinfo; 1995; 8 Pt 1():332. PubMed ID: 8591190
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Self-assessments of patients via Tablet PC in routine patient care: comparison with standardised paper questionnaires.
Richter JG; Becker A; Koch T; Nixdorf M; Willers R; Monser R; Schacher B; Alten R; Specker C; Schneider M
Ann Rheum Dis; 2008 Dec; 67(12):1739-41. PubMed ID: 18647853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Usability of an innovative and interactive electronic system for collection of patient-reported data in axial spondyloarthritis: comparison with the traditional paper-administered format.
Salaffi F; Gasparini S; Ciapetti A; Gutierrez M; Grassi W
Rheumatology (Oxford); 2013 Nov; 52(11):2062-70. PubMed ID: 23955646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Factors influencing the quality of medical documentation when a paper-based medical records system is replaced with an electronic medical records system: an Iranian case study.
Pourasghar F; Malekafzali H; Koch S; Fors U
Int J Technol Assess Health Care; 2008; 24(4):445-51. PubMed ID: 18828939
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Optimising workflow in andrology: a new electronic patient record and database.
Tüttelmann F; Luetjens CM; Nieschlag E
Asian J Androl; 2006 Mar; 8(2):235-41. PubMed ID: 16491277
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
