587 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21855950)
41. A comparison of laparoendoscopic single-site surgery versus conventional procedures for laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a Japanese multi-institutional retrospective study.
Inoue T; Miura M; Yanishi M; Furukawa J; Sato F; Nitta M; Yoshimura K; Hagiuda J; Shinoda K; Kobayashi T; Miyajima A; Nakagawa K; Oya M; Ogawa O; Mimata H; Kanayama HO; Fujisawa M; Terachi T; Matsuda T; Habuchi T;
Surg Endosc; 2020 Aug; 34(8):3424-3434. PubMed ID: 31549237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A controlled sequential evaluation of open donor nephrectomy versus classical and modified laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: an update.
Khauli RB; El-Hout Y; Hussein M; Dagher FJ; Medawar W; Houjaij A; Sawah S; Houjaij A; Daouk M; Uwaydah M; Abdelnoor A
Transplant Proc; 2005 Sep; 37(7):2944-6. PubMed ID: 16213269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Use of nonabsorbable polymer ligaclip in hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy for living donor.
Giron F; Baez Y; Niño-Murcia A; Rodríguez J; Salcedo S
Transplant Proc; 2008 Apr; 40(3):682-4. PubMed ID: 18454985
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Results and surgical complications of living donor nephrectomy: open vs hand-assisted laparoscopic nephrectomy].
Branchereau J; Rigaud J; Normand G; Muller B; Lepage JY; Giral M; Karam G
Prog Urol; 2009 Jun; 19(6):389-94. PubMed ID: 19467457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Outcomes of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy without intraoperative systemic heparinization.
Cheng EY; Leeser DB; Kapur S; Del Pizzo J
J Urol; 2010 Jun; 183(6):2282-6. PubMed ID: 20400133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Laparoscopic nephrectomy: safe and comfortable surgical alternative for living donors and for good results of graft function.
Rocca X; Espinoza O; Hidalgo F; Gonzalez F
Transplant Proc; 2005 Oct; 37(8):3349-50. PubMed ID: 16298592
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. Feasibility and safety of retroperitoneoscopic laparoendoscopic single-site nephrectomy: technique and early outcomes.
Chueh SC; Sankari BR; Chung SD; Jones JS
BJU Int; 2011 Dec; 108(11):1879-85. PubMed ID: 21443657
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. A comparison of kidney retrieval incisions in laparoscopic transperitoneal donor nephrectomy.
Gupta M; Singh P; Dubey D; Srivastava A; Kapoor R; Kumar A
Urol Int; 2008; 81(3):296-300. PubMed ID: 18931546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Incidence of increased creatine kinase and its effect on kidney function in hand assisted laparoscopic kidney donors and their recipients.
Harper JD; Baron PW; Ojogho ON; Baldwin DD
J Urol; 2007 Oct; 178(4 Pt 1):1391-5; discussion 1395. PubMed ID: 17707064
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Hand-assisted laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy: a comparison study in the canine model.
Ravizzini PI; Shulsinger D; Guarnizo E; Pavlovich CP; Marion D; Sosa RE
Tech Urol; 1999 Sep; 5(3):174-8. PubMed ID: 10527264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Prospective, case matched comparison of hand assisted laparoscopic and open surgical live donor nephrectomy.
Wolf JS; Marcovich R; Merion RM; Konnak JW
J Urol; 2000 Jun; 163(6):1650-3. PubMed ID: 10799153
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Hand-assisted laparoscopic and open living donor nephrectomy in Korea.
Ku JH; Yeo WG; Han DH; Lee SW; Kim HH
Int J Urol; 2005 May; 12(5):436-41. PubMed ID: 15948741
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. Why potential live renal donors prefer laparoscopic nephrectomy: a survey of live donor attitudes.
Chung E; Grant AB; Hibberd AD; Sprott P
BJU Int; 2007 Dec; 100(6):1344-6. PubMed ID: 17850384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The safety and efficacy of laparoscopic donor nephrectomy for renal transplantation: an updated meta-analysis.
Yuan H; Liu L; Zheng S; Yang L; Pu C; Wei Q; Han P
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(1):65-76. PubMed ID: 23375276
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. First prize: Standard laparoscopic donor nephrectomy versus laparoendoscopic single-site donor nephrectomy: a randomized comparative study.
Kurien A; Rajapurkar S; Sinha L; Mishra S; Ganpule A; Muthu V; Sabnis R; Desai M
J Endourol; 2011 Mar; 25(3):365-70. PubMed ID: 21198375
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [Comparison of the surgical approaches for nephrectomy in living related donors].
Nie HB; Yu LX; Hu WL; Gao X; Lü J; Zhang XM; Zhang LC; Wang W; Qiu XF; Xiao YS; Zhu YS
Nan Fang Yi Ke Da Xue Xue Bao; 2009 Mar; 29(3):500-3. PubMed ID: 19304536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. Early and late graft function after laparoscopic hand-assisted donor nephrectomy for living kidney transplantation: comparison with open donor nephrectomy.
Hoda MR; Hamza A; Greco F; Wagner S; Fischer K; Fornara P
Urol Int; 2010; 84(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 20173371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Results in laparoscopic living donor nephrectomy: a multicentric experience.
Ferrario M; Buckel E; Astorga C; Godoy J; Aguiló J; González G; Ormazábal J; Cámbara A; Derosas C; Herzog C; Calabrán L
Transplant Proc; 2013; 45(10):3716-8. PubMed ID: 24315006
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Hand-assisted technique facilitates preserving graft viability in laparoscopic donor nephrectomy.
Marui Y; Nakamura M; Tanaka K; Tomikawa S
Transplant Proc; 2012 Jan; 44(1):26-9. PubMed ID: 22310569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
