188 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21856017)
1. Agreement between physicians' and patients' ratings on the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
Cunningham JL; Wernroth L; von Knorring L; Berglund L; Ekselius L
J Affect Disord; 2011 Dec; 135(1-3):148-53. PubMed ID: 21856017
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The self-reported Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale is a useful evaluative tool in Major Depressive Disorder.
Fantino B; Moore N
BMC Psychiatry; 2009 May; 9():26. PubMed ID: 19473506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Relationship between the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale and the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in depressed elderly: a meta-analysis.
Heo M; Murphy CF; Meyers BS
Am J Geriatr Psychiatry; 2007 Oct; 15(10):899-905. PubMed ID: 17911366
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Self- and clinician-rated Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale: evaluation in clinical practice.
Bondolfi G; Jermann F; Rouget BW; Gex-Fabry M; McQuillan A; Dupont-Willemin A; Aubry JM; Nguyen C
J Affect Disord; 2010 Mar; 121(3):268-72. PubMed ID: 19660815
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Patients' perspectives on the use of the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale self-assessment version in primary care.
Wikberg C; Pettersson A; Westman J; Björkelund C; Petersson EL
Scand J Prim Health Care; 2016 Dec; 34(4):434-442. PubMed ID: 27804312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A comparison between the Beck Depression Inventory (BDI) and the self-rating version of the Montgomery Asberg Depression Rating Scale (MADRS).
Svanborg P; Asberg M
J Affect Disord; 2001 May; 64(2-3):203-16. PubMed ID: 11313087
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Derivation of a definition of remission on the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale corresponding to the definition of remission on the Hamilton rating scale for depression.
Zimmerman M; Posternak MA; Chelminski I
J Psychiatr Res; 2004; 38(6):577-82. PubMed ID: 15458853
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The clinical relevance of changes in the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale using the minimum clinically important difference approach.
Duru G; Fantino B
Curr Med Res Opin; 2008 May; 24(5):1329-35. PubMed ID: 18377706
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Moderate and severe depression. Gradations for the Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale.
Müller MJ; Szegedi A; Wetzel H; Benkert O
J Affect Disord; 2000 Nov; 60(2):137-40. PubMed ID: 10967373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translating the HAM-D into the MADRS and vice versa with equipercentile linking.
Leucht S; Fennema H; Engel RR; Kaspers-Janssen M; Szegedi A
J Affect Disord; 2018 Jan; 226():326-331. PubMed ID: 29031182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Evaluation of depressive symptoms in patients with coronary artery disease using the Montgomery Åsberg Depression Rating Scale.
Bunevicius A; Staniute M; Brozaitiene J; Pommer AM; Pop VJ; Montgomery SA; Bunevicius R
Int Clin Psychopharmacol; 2012 Sep; 27(5):249-55. PubMed ID: 22869009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Guidance on the conversion of the Chinese versions of the Quick Inventory of Depressive Symptomatology-Self-Report (C-QIDS-SR) and the Montgomery-Asberg Scale (C-MADRS) in Chinese patients with major depression.
Liu J; Xiang YT; Lei H; Wang Q; Wang G; Ungvari GS; Morris DW; Zhu XZ; Lai KY; Zhong BL; Wong SY; Zhang L; Zhang Q; Zou YC; Xiao L; Zhao Q; Li Y; Wu J; Zhang GF; Chiu HF
J Affect Disord; 2014 Jan; 152-154():530-3. PubMed ID: 24144585
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. What does the MADRS mean? Equipercentile linking with the CGI using a company database of mirtazapine studies.
Leucht S; Fennema H; Engel RR; Kaspers-Janssen M; Lepping P; Szegedi A
J Affect Disord; 2017 Mar; 210():287-293. PubMed ID: 28068617
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Assessing depression severity with a self-rated vs. rater-administered instrument in patients with epilepsy.
Jamal-Omidi S; Collins C; Fulchiero E; Liu H; Colon-Zimmermann K; Fuentes-Casiano E; Tatsuoka C; Cassidy KA; Lhatoo S; Sajatovic M
Epilepsy Behav; 2018 Aug; 85():52-57. PubMed ID: 29908384
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Differentiating moderate and severe depression using the Montgomery-Asberg depression rating scale (MADRS).
Müller MJ; Himmerich H; Kienzle B; Szegedi A
J Affect Disord; 2003 Dec; 77(3):255-60. PubMed ID: 14612225
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic accuracy of the Montgomery-Åsberg Depression Rating Scale parent report among adolescent psychiatric outpatients.
Torres Soler C; Olofsdotter S; Vadlin S; Ramklint M; Nilsson KW; Sonnby K
Nord J Psychiatry; 2018 Apr; 72(3):184-190. PubMed ID: 29258381
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Ratings surveillance and reliability in a study of major depressive disorder with subthreshold hypomania (mixed features).
Targum SD; Pendergrass JC; Lee S; Loebel A
Int J Methods Psychiatr Res; 2018 Dec; 27(4):e1729. PubMed ID: 29943445
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic Validity and Factor Analysis of Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale in Parkinson Disease Population.
Ketharanathan T; Hanwella R; Weerasundera R; de Silva VA
J Geriatr Psychiatry Neurol; 2016 May; 29(3):115-9. PubMed ID: 26392481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Social anxiety symptoms across diagnoses among outpatients attending a tertiary care mood and anxiety disorders service.
Graystone HJ; Garner MJ; Baldwin DS
J Affect Disord; 2009 Apr; 114(1-3):305-9. PubMed ID: 18656267
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Evidence to Support Montgomery-Asberg Depression Rating Scale Administration Every 24 Hours to Assess Rapid Onset of Treatment Response.
Johnson KM; Devine JM; Ho KF; Howard KA; Saretsky TL; Jamieson CA
J Clin Psychiatry; 2016 Dec; 77(12):1681-1686. PubMed ID: 28086004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
