609 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21856044)
1. Intraosseous versus intravenous vascular access during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: a randomized controlled trial.
Reades R; Studnek JR; Vandeventer S; Garrett J
Ann Emerg Med; 2011 Dec; 58(6):509-16. PubMed ID: 21856044
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Paramedics successfully perform humeral EZ-IO intraosseous access in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrest patients.
Wampler D; Schwartz D; Shumaker J; Bolleter S; Beckett R; Manifold C
Am J Emerg Med; 2012 Sep; 30(7):1095-9. PubMed ID: 22030185
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of first-attempt success between tibial and humeral intraosseous insertions during out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Reades R; Studnek JR; Garrett JS; Vandeventer S; Blackwell T
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2011; 15(2):278-81. PubMed ID: 21275573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of success rate and access time for an adult sternal intraosseous device deployed in the prehospital setting.
Byars DV; Tsuchitani SN; Erwin E; Anglemyer B; Eastman J
Prehosp Disaster Med; 2011 Apr; 26(2):127-9. PubMed ID: 21888733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The association of tibial vs. humeral intraosseous vascular access with patient outcomes in adult out-of-hospital cardiac arrests.
Brebner C; Asamoah-Boaheng M; Zaidel B; Yap J; Scheuermeyer F; Mok V; Christian M; Kawano T; Singh L; van Diepen S; Christenson J; Grunau B
Resuscitation; 2023 Dec; 193():110031. PubMed ID: 37923113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Time to epinephrine in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest: A retrospective analysis of intraosseous versus intravenous access.
Ross EM; Mapp J; Kharod C; Wampler DA; Velasquez C; Miramontes DA
Am J Disaster Med; 2016; 11(2):119-123. PubMed ID: 28102532
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Intraosseous Vascular Access Is Associated With Lower Survival and Neurologic Recovery Among Patients With Out-of-Hospital Cardiac Arrest.
Kawano T; Grunau B; Scheuermeyer FX; Gibo K; Fordyce CB; Lin S; Stenstrom R; Schlamp R; Jenneson S; Christenson J
Ann Emerg Med; 2018 May; 71(5):588-596. PubMed ID: 29310869
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A randomized comparison of cardiocerebral and cardiopulmonary resuscitation using a swine model of prolonged ventricular fibrillation.
Mader TJ; Kellogg AR; Walterscheid JK; Lodding CC; Sherman LD
Resuscitation; 2010 May; 81(5):596-602. PubMed ID: 20176434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The role of intraosseous vascular access in the out-of-hospital environment (resource document to NAEMSP position statement).
Fowler R; Gallagher JV; Isaacs SM; Ossman E; Pepe P; Wayne M
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2007; 11(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 17169880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. King LT-D use by urban basic life support first responders as the primary airway device for out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Gahan K; Studnek JR; Vandeventer S
Resuscitation; 2011 Dec; 82(12):1525-8. PubMed ID: 21756859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Use of a battery-operated needle driver for intraosseous access by novice users: skill acquisition with cadavers.
Levitan RM; Bortle CD; Snyder TA; Nitsch DA; Pisaturo JT; Butler KH
Ann Emerg Med; 2009 Nov; 54(5):692-4. PubMed ID: 19643511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparison of intraosseous versus central venous vascular access in adults under resuscitation in the emergency department with inaccessible peripheral veins.
Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Bogner V; Braunstein V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG
Resuscitation; 2012 Jan; 83(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 21893125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. A Randomized Cadaver Study Comparing First-Attempt Success Between Tibial and Humeral Intraosseous Insertions Using NIO Device by Paramedics: A Preliminary Investigation.
Szarpak L; Truszewski Z; Smereka J; Krajewski P; Fudalej M; Adamczyk P; Czyzewski L
Medicine (Baltimore); 2016 May; 95(20):e3724. PubMed ID: 27196493
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Intraosseous devices: a randomized controlled trial comparing three intraosseous devices.
Hartholt KA; van Lieshout EM; Thies WC; Patka P; Schipper IB
Prehosp Emerg Care; 2010; 14(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 19947861
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of two intraosseous access devices in adult patients under resuscitation in the emergency department: A prospective, randomized study.
Leidel BA; Kirchhoff C; Braunstein V; Bogner V; Biberthaler P; Kanz KG
Resuscitation; 2010 Aug; 81(8):994-9. PubMed ID: 20434823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Intraosseous compared to intravenous drug resuscitation in out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Feinstein BA; Stubbs BA; Rea T; Kudenchuk PJ
Resuscitation; 2017 Aug; 117():91-96. PubMed ID: 28629995
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Comparison of tibial intraosseous, sternal intraosseous, and intravenous routes of administration on pharmacokinetics of epinephrine during cardiac arrest: a pilot study.
Burgert J; Gegel B; Loughren M; Ceremuga T; Desai M; Schlicher M; O'Sullivan J; Lewis P; Johnson D
AANA J; 2012 Aug; 80(4 Suppl):S6-10. PubMed ID: 23248824
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. EZ-IO(®) intraosseous device implementation in a pre-hospital emergency service: A prospective study and review of the literature.
Santos D; Carron PN; Yersin B; Pasquier M
Resuscitation; 2013 Apr; 84(4):440-5. PubMed ID: 23160104
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Survival outcomes with the introduction of intravenous epinephrine in the management of out-of-hospital cardiac arrest.
Ong ME; Tan EH; Ng FS; Panchalingham A; Lim SH; Manning PG; Ong VY; Lim SH; Yap S; Tham LP; Ng KS; Venkataraman A;
Ann Emerg Med; 2007 Dec; 50(6):635-42. PubMed ID: 17509730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Need of intraosseous access in advanced life support in the in-hospital setting: Evaluation of difficult vascular access in cardiac arrest.
Leutscher SA; Gerritse BM; van der Meer NJ; Schuitemaker FJ; Scohy TV
Resuscitation; 2017 Mar; 112():e7. PubMed ID: 28007507
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
