These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

111 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21856063)

  • 21. Global interference and spatial uncertainty in the Sustained Attention to Response Task (SART).
    Helton WS; Weil L; Middlemiss A; Sawers A
    Conscious Cogn; 2010 Mar; 19(1):77-85. PubMed ID: 20138552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Hierarchical forms processing in adults and children.
    Harrison TB; Stiles J
    J Exp Child Psychol; 2009 Jun; 103(2):222-40. PubMed ID: 18973909
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. An ERP investigation on visuotactile interactions in peripersonal and extrapersonal space: evidence for the spatial rule.
    Sambo CF; Forster B
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2009 Aug; 21(8):1550-9. PubMed ID: 18767919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Effects of feature-selective and spatial attention at different stages of visual processing.
    Andersen SK; Fuchs S; Müller MM
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Jan; 23(1):238-46. PubMed ID: 19702461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Density, connectedness and attentional capture in hierarchical patterns: evidence from simultanagnosia.
    Montoro PR; Luna D; Humphreys GW
    Cortex; 2011 Jun; 47(6):706-14. PubMed ID: 20674891
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. The role of high spatial frequencies in hemispheric processing of categorical and coordinate spatial relations.
    Okubo M; Michimata C
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2004 Nov; 16(9):1576-82. PubMed ID: 15601520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Looking left with left neglect: the role of spatial attention when active vision selects local image features for fixation.
    Ptak R; Golay L; Müri RM; Schnider A
    Cortex; 2009; 45(10):1156-66. PubMed ID: 19038381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Spatial processing and hemispheric asymmetry. Contributions of the transient/magnocellular visual system.
    Roth EC; Hellige JB
    J Cogn Neurosci; 1998 Jul; 10(4):472-84. PubMed ID: 9712677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Neural mechanisms of global/local processing of bilateral visual inputs: an ERP study.
    Jiang Y; Han S
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2005 Jun; 116(6):1444-54. PubMed ID: 15978507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Right hemisphere dominance for auditory attention and its modulation by eye position: an event related fMRI study.
    Petit L; Simon G; Joliot M; Andersson F; Bertin T; Zago L; Mellet E; Tzourio-Mazoyer N
    Restor Neurol Neurosci; 2007; 25(3-4):211-25. PubMed ID: 17943000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Categorical and coordinate spatial processing in the imagery domain investigated by rTMS.
    Trojano L; Conson M; Maffei R; Grossi D
    Neuropsychologia; 2006; 44(9):1569-74. PubMed ID: 16529780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Additive effects of emotional content and spatial selective attention on electrocortical facilitation.
    Keil A; Moratti S; Sabatinelli D; Bradley MM; Lang PJ
    Cereb Cortex; 2005 Aug; 15(8):1187-97. PubMed ID: 15590910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Event-related potential evidence for a dual-locus model of global/local processing.
    Dalrymple KA; Kingstone A; Handy TC
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2009 Jul; 26(5):456-70. PubMed ID: 20183012
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Matching cue size and task properties in exogenous attention.
    Burnett KE; d'Avossa G; Sapir A
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2013; 66(12):2363-75. PubMed ID: 23574543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Asymmetries in visual-spatial processing following childhood stroke.
    Schatz J; Craft S; Koby M; DeBaun MR
    Neuropsychology; 2004 Apr; 18(2):340-52. PubMed ID: 15099156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Categorical and coordinate spatial representations within object-location memory.
    van Asselen M; Kessels RP; Kappelle LJ; Postma A
    Cortex; 2008 Mar; 44(3):249-56. PubMed ID: 18387555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The role of stimulus factors in making categorical and coordinate spatial judgments.
    Wilkinson D; Donnelly N
    Brain Cogn; 1999 Apr; 39(3):171-85. PubMed ID: 10101039
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Unimodal and crossmodal gradients of spatial attention: Evidence from event-related potentials.
    Föcker J; Hötting K; Gondan M; Röder B
    Brain Topogr; 2010 Mar; 23(1):1-13. PubMed ID: 19821021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Temporal characteristics of working memory for spatial relations: an ERP study.
    van der Ham IJ; van Strien JW; Oleksiak A; van Wezel RJ; Postma A
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2010 Aug; 77(2):83-94. PubMed ID: 20462512
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Interactions between task difficulty and hemispheric distribution of attended locations: implications for the splitting attention debate.
    Kraft A; Müller NG; Hagendorf H; Schira MM; Dick S; Fendrich RM; Brandt SA
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2005 Jun; 24(1):19-32. PubMed ID: 15922154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.