BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

249 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21856119)

  • 1. Alternatives for randomization in lifestyle intervention studies in cancer patients were not better than conventional randomization.
    Velthuis MJ; May AM; Monninkhof EM; van der Wall E; Peeters PH
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Mar; 65(3):288-92. PubMed ID: 21856119
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Pre-randomisation in study designs: getting past the taboo].
    Schellings R; Kessels AG; Sturmans F
    Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd; 2008 Sep; 152(38):2053-6. PubMed ID: 18837179
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Using the Zelen design in randomized controlled trials: debates and controversies.
    Homer CS
    J Adv Nurs; 2002 Apr; 38(2):200-7. PubMed ID: 11940133
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Must research participants understand randomization?
    Wendler D
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):3-8. PubMed ID: 19180378
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Qualitative research in evidence-based medicine: improving decision-making and participation in randomized controlled trials of cancer treatments.
    Audrey S
    Palliat Med; 2011 Dec; 25(8):758-65. PubMed ID: 21844137
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pseudo cluster randomization dealt with selection bias and contamination in clinical trials.
    Teerenstra S; Melis RJ; Peer PG; Borm GF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2006 Apr; 59(4):381-6. PubMed ID: 16549260
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Control of selection bias in parallel-group controlled clinical trials in dogs and cats: 97 trials (2000-2005).
    Brown DC
    J Am Vet Med Assoc; 2006 Sep; 229(6):990-3. PubMed ID: 16978121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Ethics and practice of Trials within Cohorts: An emerging pragmatic trial design.
    Kim SY; Flory J; Relton C
    Clin Trials; 2018 Feb; 15(1):9-16. PubMed ID: 29224380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Randomization and the transactional framework for informed consent.
    Reynolds D; Fleming DA
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):16-7. PubMed ID: 19180385
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Advantages and drawbacks of the Zelen design for randomized clinical trials.
    Horwitz RI; Feinstein AR
    J Clin Pharmacol New Drugs; 1980 Jul; 20(7):425-7. PubMed ID: 11658484
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Randomization can be risky.
    Lott J
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):17-8. PubMed ID: 19180386
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Understanding randomization: helpful strategies.
    Brody H; Childress AM
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):14-5. PubMed ID: 19180384
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Equipoise trumps randomization.
    Fox MD; Hellman CM; Jelley MR
    Am J Bioeth; 2009 Feb; 9(2):13-4. PubMed ID: 19180383
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Proposals to Conduct Randomized Controlled Trials Without Informed Consent: a Narrative Review.
    Flory JH; Mushlin AI; Goodman ZI
    J Gen Intern Med; 2016 Dec; 31(12):1511-1518. PubMed ID: 27384536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Zelen randomization: attitudes of parents participating in a neonatal clinical trial.
    Snowdon C; Elbourne D; Garcia J
    Control Clin Trials; 1999 Apr; 20(2):149-71. PubMed ID: 10227415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Clinical trials:randomization before consent.
    Armstrong PW; Watts DG
    Biomedicine; 1981 Sep; 34(2):65-6. PubMed ID: 7284544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. De facto masking and other measures to prevent contamination.
    Berger VW
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2012 Nov; 65(11):1236; author reply 1236-7. PubMed ID: 23017642
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The adapted Zelen was a feasible design to trial exercise in myeloma survivors.
    Land J; McCourt O; Heinrich M; Beeken RJ; Koutoukidis DA; Paton B; Yong K; Hackshaw A; Fisher A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2020 Sep; 125():76-83. PubMed ID: 32289352
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Understanding the decisions of cancer clinical trial participants to enter research studies: factors associated with informed consent, patient satisfaction, and decisional regret.
    Stryker JE; Wray RJ; Emmons KM; Winer E; Demetri G
    Patient Educ Couns; 2006 Oct; 63(1-2):104-9. PubMed ID: 16242898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Randomization and efficiency in Zelen's single-consent design.
    Matts J; McHugh R
    Biometrics; 1987 Dec; 43(4):885-94. PubMed ID: 3427173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.