171 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21856650)
1. A robust method using propensity score stratification for correcting verification bias for binary tests.
He H; McDermott MP
Biostatistics; 2012 Jan; 13(1):32-47. PubMed ID: 21856650
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Nearest-Neighbor Estimation for ROC Analysis under Verification Bias.
Adimari G; Chiogna M
Int J Biostat; 2015 May; 11(1):109-24. PubMed ID: 25781712
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Estimation of the volume under the receiver-operating characteristic surface adjusting for non-ignorable verification bias.
Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
Stat Methods Med Res; 2018 Mar; 27(3):715-739. PubMed ID: 29338546
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Bayesian nonparametric estimation of ROC surface under verification bias.
Zhu R; Ghosal S
Stat Med; 2019 Aug; 38(18):3361-3377. PubMed ID: 31049998
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve in the presence of verification bias.
He H; Lyness JM; McDermott MP
Stat Med; 2009 Feb; 28(3):361-76. PubMed ID: 18680124
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Avoiding verification bias in screening test evaluation in resource poor settings: a case study from Zimbabwe.
Gaffikin L; McGrath J; Arbyn M; Blumenthal PD
Clin Trials; 2008; 5(5):496-503. PubMed ID: 18827042
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Verification bias-corrected estimators of the relative true and false positive rates of two binary screening tests.
Alonzo TA
Stat Med; 2005 Feb; 24(3):403-17. PubMed ID: 15543634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Direct estimation of the area under the receiver operating characteristic curve with verification biased data.
Hai Y; Qin G
Stat Med; 2020 Dec; 39(30):4789-4820. PubMed ID: 32944975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Estimation of Area Under the ROC Curve under nonignorable verification bias.
Yu W; Kim JK; Park T
Stat Sin; 2018 Oct; 28(4):2149-2166. PubMed ID: 31367164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Inverse probability weighting estimation of the volume under the ROC surface in the presence of verification bias.
Zhang Y; Alonzo TA;
Biom J; 2016 Nov; 58(6):1338-1356. PubMed ID: 27338713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Covariate adjustment in estimating the area under ROC curve with partially missing gold standard.
Liu D; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2013 Mar; 69(1):91-100. PubMed ID: 23410529
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Propensity score analysis with partially observed covariates: How should multiple imputation be used?
Leyrat C; Seaman SR; White IR; Douglas I; Smeeth L; Kim J; Resche-Rigon M; Carpenter JR; Williamson EJ
Stat Methods Med Res; 2019 Jan; 28(1):3-19. PubMed ID: 28573919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correcting for partial verification bias in diagnostic accuracy studies: A tutorial using R.
Arifin WN; Yusof UK
Stat Med; 2022 Apr; 41(9):1709-1727. PubMed ID: 35043447
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. A global sensitivity analysis of performance of a medical diagnostic test when verification bias is present.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Stat Med; 2003 Sep; 22(17):2711-21. PubMed ID: 12939781
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accounting for nonignorable verification bias in assessment of diagnostic tests.
Kosinski AS; Barnhart HX
Biometrics; 2003 Mar; 59(1):163-71. PubMed ID: 12762453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effect of verification bias on positive and negative predictive values.
Zhou XH
Stat Med; 1994 Sep; 13(17):1737-45. PubMed ID: 7997707
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. ROC curve estimation when covariates affect the verification process.
Rodenberg C; Zhou XH
Biometrics; 2000 Dec; 56(4):1256-62. PubMed ID: 11129488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Multiple imputation to correct for partial verification bias revisited.
de Groot JA; Janssen KJ; Zwinderman AH; Moons KG; Reitsma JB
Stat Med; 2008 Dec; 27(28):5880-9. PubMed ID: 18752256
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Partial Verification Bias Correction Using Inverse Probability Bootstrap Sampling for Binary Diagnostic Tests.
Arifin WN; Yusof UK
Diagnostics (Basel); 2022 Nov; 12(11):. PubMed ID: 36428900
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Combining biomarker trajectories to improve diagnostic accuracy in prospective cohort studies with verification bias.
Li H; Gatsonis C
Stat Med; 2019 May; 38(11):1968-1990. PubMed ID: 30590870
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
