These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

172 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21856722)

  • 1. Responsiveness of the cervical Northern American Spine Society questionnaire (NASS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in chronic whiplash.
    Angst F; Verra ML; Lehmann S; Gysi F; Benz T; Aeschlimann A
    Clin Rehabil; 2012 Feb; 26(2):142-51. PubMed ID: 21856722
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Re: Responsiveness of the cervical Northern American Spine Society questionnaire (NASS) and the Short Form 36 (SF-36) in chronic whiplash.
    Branney J
    Clin Rehabil; 2012 Nov; 26(11):1053-4. PubMed ID: 23077150
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Two different courses of impaired cervical kinaesthesia following a whiplash injury. A one-year prospective study.
    Oddsdottir GL; Kristjansson E
    Man Ther; 2012 Feb; 17(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 21955671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Is a condition-specific instrument for patients with low back pain/leg symptoms really necessary? The responsiveness of the Oswestry Disability Index, MODEMS, and the SF-36.
    Walsh TL; Hanscom B; Lurie JD; Weinstein JN
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2003 Mar; 28(6):607-15. PubMed ID: 12642770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Responsiveness of pain and disability measures for chronic whiplash.
    Stewart M; Maher CG; Refshauge KM; Bogduk N; Nicholas M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(5):580-5. PubMed ID: 17334294
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Neck Disability Index, short form-36 physical component summary, and pain scales for neck and arm pain: the minimum clinically important difference and substantial clinical benefit after cervical spine fusion.
    Carreon LY; Glassman SD; Campbell MJ; Anderson PA
    Spine J; 2010 Jun; 10(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20359958
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Outcome sensitivity of the North American Spine Society Instrument with special consideration for the neurogenic symptoms of chronic back pain].
    Peters A; Sabariego C; Wildner M; Sangha Dagger O
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 2004; 142(4):435-41. PubMed ID: 15346305
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Validity and sensitivity to change of the NASS questionnaire for patients with cervical spine disorders.
    Stoll T; Huber E; Bachmann S; Baumeler HR; Mariacher S; Rutz M; Schneider W; Spring H; Aeschlimann A; Stucki G; Steiner W
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2004 Dec; 29(24):2851-5. PubMed ID: 15599289
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Responsiveness of five outcome measurement instruments in total elbow arthroplasty.
    Angst F; Goldhahn J; Drerup S; Kolling C; Aeschlimann A; Simmen BR; Schwyzer HK
    Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken); 2012 Nov; 64(11):1749-55. PubMed ID: 22674818
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Responsiveness of the WOMAC osteoarthritis index as compared with the SF-36 in patients with osteoarthritis of the legs undergoing a comprehensive rehabilitation intervention.
    Angst F; Aeschlimann A; Steiner W; Stucki G
    Ann Rheum Dis; 2001 Sep; 60(9):834-40. PubMed ID: 11502609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Factor analysis of the North American Spine Society outcome assessment instrument: a study based on a spine registry of patients treated with lumbar and cervical disc arthroplasty.
    Aghayev E; Elfering A; Schizas C; Mannion AF;
    Spine J; 2014 Jun; 14(6):916-24. PubMed ID: 24200412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The risk assessment score in acute whiplash injury predicts outcome and reflects biopsychosocial factors.
    Kasch H; Qerama E; Kongsted A; Bach FW; Bendix T; Jensen TS
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2011 Dec; 36(25 Suppl):S263-7. PubMed ID: 22020622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. [Validation of the North American Spine Society Instrument for assessment of health status in patients with chronic backache].
    Pose B; Sangha O; Peters A; Wildner M
    Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb; 1999; 137(5):437-41. PubMed ID: 10549122
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Resolution of whiplash-associated allodynia following cervicothoracic thrust and non-thrust manipulation.
    Lowry CD; O'Hearn MA; Courtney CA
    Physiother Theory Pract; 2011 Aug; 27(6):451-9. PubMed ID: 20977379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Evaluation of the core outcome measure in whiplash.
    Rebbeck TJ; Refshauge KM; Maher CG; Stewart M
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2007 Mar; 32(6):696-702. PubMed ID: 17413477
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Prospective PC-interactive pressure algesimetry of post-traumatic neck pain after whiplash injury.
    Nebel K; Stude P; Lüdecke C; Wiese H; Diener HC; Keidel M
    Cephalalgia; 2005 Mar; 25(3):205-13. PubMed ID: 15689196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparison of internal and external responsiveness of the generic Medical Outcome Study Short Form-36 (SF-36) with disease-specific measures in rheumatoid arthritis.
    Veehof MM; ten Klooster PM; Taal E; van Riel PL; van de Laar MA
    J Rheumatol; 2008 Apr; 35(4):610-7. PubMed ID: 18322989
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Multidisciplinary biopsychosocial rehabilitation in chronic neck pain: a naturalistic prospective cohort study with intraindividual control of effects and 12-month follow-up.
    Letzel J; Angst F; Weigl MB
    Eur J Phys Rehabil Med; 2019 Oct; 55(5):665-675. PubMed ID: 30468363
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Accurately measuring outcomes after surgery for adult Chiari I malformation: determining the most valid and responsive instruments.
    Godil SS; Parker SL; Zuckerman SL; Mendenhall SK; McGirt MJ
    Neurosurgery; 2013 May; 72(5):820-7; discussion 827. PubMed ID: 23381490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Conservative treatment of lumbar disc disease: patient's quality of life compared to an unexposed cohort.
    Schneider C; Krayenbühl N; Landolt H
    Acta Neurochir (Wien); 2007 Aug; 149(8):783-91; discussion 791. PubMed ID: 17624490
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.