These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

347 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21856900)

  • 1. Production traits of litters in 2 crossbred Duroc pig lines.
    Rootwelt V; Reksen O; Framstad T
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Jan; 90(1):152-8. PubMed ID: 21856900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Piglet birth weight and litter uniformity: effects of weaning-to-pregnancy interval and body condition changes in sows of different parities and crossbred lines.
    Wientjes JG; Soede NM; Knol EF; van den Brand H; Kemp B
    J Anim Sci; 2013 May; 91(5):2099-107. PubMed ID: 23463562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of RYR1 genotype of Piétrain boars on litter traits of Czech Large White x Czech Landrace crossbred sows.
    Cechová M; Wolf J; Trcka P
    J Anim Breed Genet; 2007 Apr; 124(2):86-93. PubMed ID: 17488359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Sow communication with piglets while being active is a good predictor of maternal skills, piglet survival and litter quality in three different breeds of domestic pigs (Sus scrofa domesticus).
    Ocepek M; Andersen IL
    PLoS One; 2018; 13(11):e0206128. PubMed ID: 30427860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Space allowance for dry, pregnant sows in pens: body condition, skin lesions, and performance.
    Salak-Johnson JL; Niekamp SR; Rodriguez-Zas SL; Ellis M; Curtis SE
    J Anim Sci; 2007 Jul; 85(7):1758-69. PubMed ID: 17371790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Blood variables and body weight gain on the first day of life in crossbred pigs and importance for survival.
    Rootwelt V; Reksen O; Farstad W; Framstad T
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Apr; 90(4):1134-41. PubMed ID: 22100597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Genetic parameters and predicted selection results for maternal traits related to lactation efficiency in sows.
    Bergsma R; Kanis E; Verstegen MW; Knol EF
    J Anim Sci; 2008 May; 86(5):1067-80. PubMed ID: 18192550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Impact of piglet birth weight, birth order, and litter size on subsequent growth performance, carcass quality, muscle composition, and eating quality of pork.
    Beaulieu AD; Aalhus JL; Williams NH; Patience JF
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Aug; 88(8):2767-78. PubMed ID: 20418451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Genetic parameters for haemoglobin levels in sows and piglets as well as sow reproductive performance and piglet survival.
    Hollema BL; Zwiers S; Hermesch S
    Animal; 2020 Apr; 14(4):688-696. PubMed ID: 31657286
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Selection for increased number of piglets at d 5 after farrowing has increased litter size and reduced piglet mortality.
    Nielsen B; Su G; Lund MS; Madsen P
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jun; 91(6):2575-82. PubMed ID: 23508021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Effects of folic acid on the performance of suckling piglets and sows during lactation.
    Wang SP; Yin YL; Qian Y; Li LL; Li FN; Tan BE; Tang XS; Huang RL
    J Sci Food Agric; 2011 Oct; 91(13):2371-7. PubMed ID: 21769873
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Postpartum deaths: piglet, placental, and umbilical characteristics.
    Rootwelt V; Reksen O; Farstad W; Framstad T
    J Anim Sci; 2013 Jun; 91(6):2647-56. PubMed ID: 23482582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Analysis of factors to predict piglet body weight at the end of the nursery phase.
    Paredes SP; Jansman AJ; Verstegen MW; Awati A; Buist W; den Hartog LA; Van Hees HM; Quiniou N; Hendriks WH; Gerrits WJ
    J Anim Sci; 2012 Sep; 90(9):3243-51. PubMed ID: 22585823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Effect of average litter weight in pigs on growth performance, carcass characteristics and meat quality of the offspring as depending on birth weight.
    Pardo CE; Kreuzer M; Bee G
    Animal; 2013 Nov; 7(11):1884-92. PubMed ID: 23896082
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Heterosis and recombination effects on pig reproductive traits.
    Cassady JP; Young LD; Leymaster KA
    J Anim Sci; 2002 Sep; 80(9):2303-15. PubMed ID: 12350007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Genetics of growth in piglets and the association with homogeneity of body weight within litters.
    Canario L; Lundgren H; Haandlykken M; Rydhmer L
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Apr; 88(4):1240-7. PubMed ID: 20081086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Effects of intermittent suckling and creep feed intake on pig performance from birth to slaughter.
    Kuller WI; Soede NM; van Beers-Schreurs HM; Langendijk P; Taverne MA; Kemp B; Verheijden JH
    J Anim Sci; 2007 May; 85(5):1295-301. PubMed ID: 17202394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Effect of live weight development and reproduction in first parity on reproductive performance of second parity sows.
    Hoving LL; Soede NM; Graat EA; Feitsma H; Kemp B
    Anim Reprod Sci; 2010 Oct; 122(1-2):82-9. PubMed ID: 20727690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Can a super sow be a robust sow? Consequences of litter investment in purebred and crossbred sows of different parities.
    Ocepek M; Andersen-Ranberg I; Edwards SA; Fredriksen B; Framstad T; Andersen IL
    J Anim Sci; 2016 Aug; 94(8):3550-3560. PubMed ID: 27695774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of crossbreeding on genetic improvement of growth and reproduction in pigs.
    Hale OM; Bondari K
    Growth; 1986; 50(4):526-36. PubMed ID: 3596329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 18.