206 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21857148)
1. T2*-weighted image/T2-weighted image fusion in postimplant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.
Katayama N; Takemoto M; Yoshio K; Katsui K; Uesugi T; Nasu Y; Matsushita T; Kaji M; Kumon H; Kanazawa S
J Radiat Res; 2011; 52(5):680-4. PubMed ID: 21857148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Interobserver variability of 3.0-tesla and 1.5-tesla magnetic resonance imaging/computed tomography fusion image-based post-implant dosimetry of prostate brachytherapy.
Watanabe K; Katayama N; Katsui K; Matsushita T; Takamoto A; Ihara H; Nasu Y; Takemoto M; Kuroda M; Kanazawa S
J Radiat Res; 2019 Jul; 60(4):483-489. PubMed ID: 31083713
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Importance of the CT/MRI fusion method as a learning tool for CT-based postimplant dosimetry in prostate brachytherapy.
Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Sakurai K; Matsuo M; Nakano M; Maeda S; Hoshi H; Deguchi T
Radiother Oncol; 2006 Dec; 81(3):303-8. PubMed ID: 17125859
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Correlation between real-time intraoperative and postoperative dosimetry and its implications on intraoperative planning.
Yan C; Huq MS; Heron DE; Beriwal S; Wynn RB
Brachytherapy; 2019; 18(3):338-347. PubMed ID: 30655047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Comparison of MRI-based and CT/MRI fusion-based postimplant dosimetric analysis of prostate brachytherapy.
Tanaka O; Hayashi S; Matsuo M; Sakurai K; Nakano M; Maeda S; Kajita K; Deguchi T; Hoshi H
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2006 Oct; 66(2):597-602. PubMed ID: 16966002
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Live implant dosimetry may be an effective replacement for postimplant computed tomography in localized prostate cancer patients receiving low dose rate brachytherapy.
Roshan D; Joyce K; Woulfe P; Gorakati PR; Stock R; Sullivan FJ
Brachytherapy; 2021; 20(4):873-882. PubMed ID: 33840634
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. MR and CT image fusion for postimplant analysis in permanent prostate seed implants.
Polo A; Cattani F; Vavassori A; Origgi D; Villa G; Marsiglia H; Bellomi M; Tosi G; De Cobelli O; Orecchia R
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1572-9. PubMed ID: 15590189
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sensitivity of clinically relevant dosimetric parameters to contouring uncertainty in postimplant dosimetry of low-dose-rate prostate permanent seed brachytherapy.
Mashouf S; Safigholi H; Merino T; Soliman A; Ravi A; Morton G; Song WY
Brachytherapy; 2016; 15(6):774-779. PubMed ID: 27720310
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Correlation between pre- and postimplant dosimetry for iodine-125 seed implants for localized prostate cancer.
Al-Qaisieh B; Witteveen T; Carey B; Henry A; Bottomley D; Smith J; Franks K; Bownes P
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2009 Oct; 75(2):626-30. PubMed ID: 19540077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Postimplant Dosimetry of Permanent Prostate Brachytherapy: Comparison of MRI-Only and CT-MRI Fusion-Based Workflows.
Nosrati R; Wronski M; Tseng CL; Chung H; Pejović-Milić A; Morton G; Stanisz GJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Jan; 106(1):206-215. PubMed ID: 31627178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Impact of MRI-based postimplant dosimetric assessment in prostate brachytherapy using contrast-enhanced T1-weighted images.
Ohashi T; Momma T; Yamashita S; Nagatsuma K; Kanai K; Kitagawa K; Takahashi S; Hanada T; Yorozu A; Shigematsu N
Brachytherapy; 2012; 11(6):468-75. PubMed ID: 22330102
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of interobserver differences in postimplant dosimetry following prostate brachytherapy and the efficacy of CT/MRI fusion imaging.
Aoki M; Yorozu A; Dokiya T
Jpn J Radiol; 2009 Nov; 27(9):342-7. PubMed ID: 19943144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of CT and MR-CT fusion for prostate post-implant dosimetry.
Maletz KL; Ennis RD; Ostenson J; Pevsner A; Kagen A; Wernick I
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2012 Apr; 82(5):1912-7. PubMed ID: 21550183
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. MRI-CT fusion to assess postbrachytherapy prostate volume and the effects of prolonged edema on dosimetry following transperineal interstitial permanent prostate brachytherapy.
Crook J; McLean M; Yeung I; Williams T; Lockwood G
Brachytherapy; 2004; 3(2):55-60. PubMed ID: 15374536
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Is intraoperative nomogram-based overplanning of prostate implants necessary?
D'Souza WD; Lee HK; Palmer MB; Smith LG; Pollack A
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2003 Jun; 56(2):462-7. PubMed ID: 12738321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. CT- and MRI-based seed localization in postimplant evaluation after prostate brachytherapy.
De Brabandere M; Al-Qaisieh B; De Wever L; Haustermans K; Kirisits C; Moerland MA; Oyen R; Rijnders A; Van den Heuvel F; Siebert FA
Brachytherapy; 2013; 12(6):580-8. PubMed ID: 23876358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of prostate volume on dosimetry results in real-time 125I seed implantation.
McNeely LK; Stone NN; Presser J; Chircus JH; Stock RG
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Jan; 58(1):292-9. PubMed ID: 14697451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of MRI pulse sequences in defining prostate volume after permanent implantation.
McLaughlin PW; Narayana V; Drake DG; Miller BM; Marsh L; Chan J; Gonda R; Winfield RJ; Roberson PL
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2002 Nov; 54(3):703-11. PubMed ID: 12377321
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Uncertainty in magnetic resonance imaging-based prostate postimplant dosimetry: Results of a 10-person human observer study, and comparisons with automatic postimplant dosimetry.
Sanders JW; Tang C; Kudchadker RJ; Venkatesan AM; Mok H; Hanania AN; Thames HD; Bruno TL; Starks C; Santiago E; Cunningham M; Frank SJ
Brachytherapy; 2023; 22(6):822-832. PubMed ID: 37716820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Prostate seed implantation using 3D-computer assisted intraoperative planning vs. a standard look-up nomogram: Improved target conformality with reduction in urethral and rectal wall dose.
Raben A; Chen H; Grebler A; Geltzeiler J; Geltzeiler M; Keselman I; Litvin S; Sim S; Hanlon A; Yang J
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2004 Dec; 60(5):1631-8. PubMed ID: 15590195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]