These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

304 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21857168)

  • 1. Comparison of robotic-assisted laparoscopy versus conventional laparoscopy on skill acquisition and performance.
    Kho RM
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 54(3):376-81. PubMed ID: 21857168
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of laparoscopic and robotic assisted suturing performance by experts and novices.
    Chandra V; Nehra D; Parent R; Woo R; Reyes R; Hernandez-Boussard T; Dutta S
    Surgery; 2010 Jun; 147(6):830-9. PubMed ID: 20045162
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery?
    Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Minimally invasive surgery in gynecologic oncology: laparoscopy versus robotics.
    Nezhat F
    Gynecol Oncol; 2008 Nov; 111(2 Suppl):S29-32. PubMed ID: 18762326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery.
    Advincula AP; Wang K
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 19423061
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Learning curves of robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared with conventional laparoscopic surgery: an experimental study evaluating skill acquisition of robot-assisted laparoscopic tasks compared with conventional laparoscopic tasks in inexperienced users.
    Heemskerk J; van Gemert WG; de Vries J; Greve J; Bouvy ND
    Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2007 Jun; 17(3):171-4. PubMed ID: 17581459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Robotic surgery in the obese gynecologic patient.
    Burke WM; Gossner G; Goldman NA
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 54(3):420-30. PubMed ID: 21857172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology.
    Sinno AK; Fader AN
    Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):922-32. PubMed ID: 25274485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of skill training with robotic systems and traditional endoscopy: implications on training and adoption.
    Maniar HS; Council ML; Prasad SM; Prasad SM; Chu C; Damiano RJ
    J Surg Res; 2005 May; 125(1):23-9. PubMed ID: 15836846
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of the learning curve and outcomes of robotic assisted pediatric pyeloplasty.
    Sorensen MD; Delostrinos C; Johnson MH; Grady RW; Lendvay TS
    J Urol; 2011 Jun; 185(6 Suppl):2517-22. PubMed ID: 21555027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Robotic appendectomy in gynaecological surgery: technique and pathological findings.
    Akl MN; Magrina JF; Kho RM; Magtibay PM
    Int J Med Robot; 2008 Sep; 4(3):210-3. PubMed ID: 18613274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice.
    Payne TN; Dauterive FR
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel drill set for the enhancement and assessment of robotic surgical performance.
    Ro CY; Toumpoulis IK; Ashton RC; Imielinska C; Jebara T; Shin SH; Zipkin JD; McGinty JJ; Todd GJ; Derose JJ
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2005; 111():418-21. PubMed ID: 15718771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology.
    Advincula AP; Song A
    Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Robot-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy versus abdominal myomectomy: a comparison of short-term surgical outcomes and immediate costs.
    Advincula AP; Xu X; Goudeau S; Ransom SB
    J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2007; 14(6):698-705. PubMed ID: 17980329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Robotic-assisted laparoscopic myomectomy compared with standard laparoscopic myomectomy--a retrospective matched control study.
    Nezhat C; Lavie O; Hsu S; Watson J; Barnett O; Lemyre M
    Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):556-9. PubMed ID: 18377901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair.
    Ross JW; Preston MR
    Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Robotic surgery in gynecology. Foreword.
    Advincula AP
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 54(3):373-5. PubMed ID: 21857167
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Robotic gynecologic surgery: past, present, and future.
    Chen CC; Falcone T
    Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2009 Sep; 52(3):335-43. PubMed ID: 19661749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
    Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
    Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 16.