These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
187 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21857170)
1. Robotic-assisted surgery for the community gynecologist: can it be adopted? Payne TN; Pitter MC Clin Obstet Gynecol; 2011 Sep; 54(3):391-411. PubMed ID: 21857170 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The role of robotic surgery in gynecology. Advincula AP; Song A Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Aug; 19(4):331-6. PubMed ID: 17625414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Evolving role and current state of robotics in minimally invasive gynecologic surgery. Advincula AP; Wang K J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2009; 16(3):291-301. PubMed ID: 19423061 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The effect of a gynecologist-interventional radiologist relationship on selection of treatment modality for the patient with uterine myoma. Zurawin RK; Fischer JH; Amir L J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2010; 17(2):214-21. PubMed ID: 20226411 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Advantages of robotics in benign gynecologic surgery. Truong M; Kim JH; Scheib S; Patzkowsky K Curr Opin Obstet Gynecol; 2016 Aug; 28(4):304-10. PubMed ID: 27362711 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. What is the learning curve for robotic assisted gynecologic surgery? Lenihan JP; Kovanda C; Seshadri-Kreaden U J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(5):589-94. PubMed ID: 18722971 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Emergence of robotic assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology: American perspective. Mendivil A; Holloway RW; Boggess JF Gynecol Oncol; 2009 Aug; 114(2 Suppl):S24-31. PubMed ID: 19573702 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Update on laparoscopic, robotic, and minimally invasive vaginal surgery for pelvic floor repair. Ross JW; Preston MR Minerva Ginecol; 2009 Jun; 61(3):173-86. PubMed ID: 19415062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study. Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. New technologies for reproductive medicine: laparoscopy, endoscopy, robotic surgery and gynecology. A review of the literature. Cho JE; Shamshirsaz AH; Nezhat C; Nezhat C; Nezhat F Minerva Ginecol; 2010 Apr; 62(2):137-67. PubMed ID: 20502426 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic-assisted surgery in gynecologic oncology. Sinno AK; Fader AN Fertil Steril; 2014 Oct; 102(4):922-32. PubMed ID: 25274485 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cost and robotic surgery in gynecology. Knight J; Escobar PF J Obstet Gynaecol Res; 2014 Jan; 40(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 24118557 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A multi-institutional experience with robotic-assisted radical hysterectomy for early stage cervical cancer. Lowe MP; Chamberlain DH; Kamelle SA; Johnson PR; Tillmanns TD Gynecol Oncol; 2009 May; 113(2):191-4. PubMed ID: 19249082 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Robotics in reproductive surgery: strengths and limitations. Catenacci M; Flyckt RL; Falcone T Placenta; 2011 Sep; 32 Suppl 3():S232-7. PubMed ID: 21784518 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A comparison of total laparoscopic hysterectomy to robotically assisted hysterectomy: surgical outcomes in a community practice. Payne TN; Dauterive FR J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2008; 15(3):286-91. PubMed ID: 18439499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]