These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
151 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21858591)
21. Paper- or Web-Based Questionnaire Invitations as a Method for Data Collection: Cross-Sectional Comparative Study of Differences in Response Rate, Completeness of Data, and Financial Cost. Ebert JF; Huibers L; Christensen B; Christensen MB J Med Internet Res; 2018 Jan; 20(1):e24. PubMed ID: 29362206 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Rates, Delays, and Completeness of General Practitioners' Responses to a Postal Versus Web-Based Survey: A Randomized Trial. Sebo P; Maisonneuve H; Cerutti B; Fournier JP; Senn N; Haller DM J Med Internet Res; 2017 Mar; 19(3):e83. PubMed ID: 28330830 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Do postage stamps versus pre-paid envelopes increase responses to patient mail surveys? A randomised controlled trial. Lavelle K; Todd C; Campbell M BMC Health Serv Res; 2008 May; 8():113. PubMed ID: 18507819 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Randomized experiment on the effect of incentives and mailing strategy on response rates in a mail survey of dentists. McKernan SC; Reynolds JC; McInroy B; Damiano PC J Public Health Dent; 2022 Sep; 82(4):484-490. PubMed ID: 35243631 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Remote Collection of Patient-Reported Outcomes Following Outpatient Hand Surgery: A Randomized Trial of Telephone, Mail, and E-Mail. Schwartzenberger J; Presson A; Lyle A; O'Farrell A; Tyser AR J Hand Surg Am; 2017 Sep; 42(9):693-699. PubMed ID: 28600107 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Following up nonrespondents to an online weight management intervention: randomized trial comparing mail versus telephone. Couper MP; Peytchev A; Strecher VJ; Rothert K; Anderson J J Med Internet Res; 2007 Jun; 9(2):e16. PubMed ID: 17567564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Response rate, response time, and economic costs of survey research: A randomized trial of practicing pharmacists. Hardigan PC; Popovici I; Carvajal MJ Res Social Adm Pharm; 2016; 12(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 26329534 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. An outbreak of web sites selling ciprofloxacin following an outbreak of anthrax by mail. Tsai AC; Lurie P; Sehgal AR Am J Med; 2002 Oct; 113(5):424-7. PubMed ID: 12401538 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. An experimental comparison of web-push vs. paper-only survey procedures for conducting an in-depth health survey of military spouses. McMaster HS; LeardMann CA; Speigle S; Dillman DA; BMC Med Res Methodol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):73. PubMed ID: 28441932 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Survey return rates as a function of priority versus first-class mailing. Brems C; Johnson ME; Warner T; Roberts LW Psychol Rep; 2006 Oct; 99(2):496-501. PubMed ID: 17153820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. The effect of administration mode on CAHPS survey response rates and results: A comparison of mail and web-based approaches. Fowler FJ; Cosenza C; Cripps LA; Edgman-Levitan S; Cleary PD Health Serv Res; 2019 Jun; 54(3):714-721. PubMed ID: 30656646 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of Web and mail surveys for studying secondary consequences associated with substance use: evidence for minimal mode effects. McCabe SE; Couper MP; Cranford JA; Boyd CJ Addict Behav; 2006 Jan; 31(1):162-8. PubMed ID: 15916862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Assessing the Effects of Participant Preference and Demographics in the Usage of Web-based Survey Questionnaires by Women Attending Screening Mammography in British Columbia. Mlikotic R; Parker B; Rajapakshe R J Med Internet Res; 2016 Mar; 18(3):e70. PubMed ID: 27005707 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Mixing web and mail methods in a survey of physicians. Beebe TJ; Locke GR; Barnes SA; Davern ME; Anderson KJ Health Serv Res; 2007 Jun; 42(3 Pt 1):1219-34. PubMed ID: 17489911 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Web-Based Patient Experience Surveys to Enhance Response Rates Labovitz J; Patel N; Santander I J Am Podiatr Med Assoc; 2017 Nov; 107(6):516-521. PubMed ID: 29252022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Comparison of a web-push survey research protocol with a mailed paper and pencil protocol in the Monitoring the Future panel survey. Patrick ME; Couper MP; Parks MJ; Laetz V; Schulenberg JE Addiction; 2021 Jan; 116(1):191-199. PubMed ID: 32533797 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Response rate, speed, and completeness: a comparison of Internet-based and mail surveys. Truell AD; Bartlett JE; Alexander MW Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput; 2002 Feb; 34(1):46-9. PubMed ID: 12060989 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparisons of the costs and quality of norms for the SF-36 health survey collected by mail versus telephone interview: results from a national survey. McHorney CA; Kosinski M; Ware JE Med Care; 1994 Jun; 32(6):551-67. PubMed ID: 8189774 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Effects of survey mode on self-reports of adult alcohol consumption: a comparison of mail, web and telephone approaches. Link MW; Mokdad AH J Stud Alcohol; 2005 Mar; 66(2):239-45. PubMed ID: 15957675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Complaint-Directed Mini-Interventions for Depressive Symptoms: A Health Economic Evaluation of Unguided Web-Based Self-Help Interventions Based on a Randomized Controlled Trial. Wijnen BF; Lokman S; Leone S; Evers SM; Smit F J Med Internet Res; 2018 Oct; 20(10):e10455. PubMed ID: 30274958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]