BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21859218)

  • 1. Assessing planning ability with the Tower of London task: psychometric properties of a structurally balanced problem set.
    Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM; Stahl C
    Psychol Assess; 2012 Mar; 24(1):46-53. PubMed ID: 21859218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Assessment of planning performance in clinical samples: Reliability and validity of the Tower of London task (TOL-F).
    Köstering L; Schmidt CS; Egger K; Amtage F; Peter J; Klöppel S; Beume LA; Hoeren M; Weiller C; Kaller CP
    Neuropsychologia; 2015 Aug; 75():646-55. PubMed ID: 26197091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Assessing Planning Ability Across the Adult Life Span: Population-Representative and Age-Adjusted Reliability Estimates for the Tower of London (TOL-F).
    Kaller CP; Debelak R; Köstering L; Egle J; Rahm B; Wild PS; Blettner M; Beutel ME; Unterrainer JM
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2016 Mar; 31(2):148-64. PubMed ID: 26715472
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Deconstructing the tower: parameters and predictors of problem difficulty on the Tower of London task.
    Berg WK; Byrd DL; McNamara JP; Case K
    Brain Cogn; 2010 Apr; 72(3):472-82. PubMed ID: 20167413
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. The impact of problem structure on planning: insights from the Tower of London task.
    Kaller CP; Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Halsband U
    Brain Res Cogn Brain Res; 2004 Aug; 20(3):462-72. PubMed ID: 15268923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Tower of London: a study of the effect of problem structure on planning.
    Newman SD; Pittman G
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2007 Apr; 29(3):333-42. PubMed ID: 17454353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Understanding planning ability measured by the Tower of London: an evaluation of its internal structure by latent variable modeling.
    Koppenol-Gonzalez GV; Bouwmeester S; Boonstra AM
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Dec; 22(4):923-34. PubMed ID: 21133551
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessment of planning ability: Psychometric analyses on the unidimensionality and construct validity of the Tower of London Task (TOL-F).
    Debelak R; Egle J; Köstering L; Kaller CP
    Neuropsychology; 2016 Mar; 30(3):346-360. PubMed ID: 26523519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. The Tower of London spatial problem-solving task: enhancing clinical and research implementation.
    Keith Berg W; Byrd D
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2002 Aug; 24(5):586-604. PubMed ID: 12187443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Reviewing the impact of problem structure on planning: a software tool for analyzing tower tasks.
    Kaller CP; Rahm B; Köstering L; Unterrainer JM
    Behav Brain Res; 2011 Jan; 216(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 20723568
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Test-retest reliability of the Tower of London Planning Task (TOL-F).
    Köstering L; Nitschke K; Schumacher FK; Weiller C; Kaller CP
    Psychol Assess; 2015 Sep; 27(3):925-31. PubMed ID: 25822835
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Adaptation and validation of the Tower of London test of planning and problem solving in people with intellectual disabilities.
    Masson JD; Dagnan D; Evans J
    J Intellect Disabil Res; 2010 May; 54(5):457-67. PubMed ID: 20537051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Psychometric analyses of the Tower of London planning task reveal high reliability and feasibility in typically developing children and child patients with ASD and ADHD.
    Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Loosli SV; Rauh R; Schumacher LV; Biscaldi M; Kaller CP
    Child Neuropsychol; 2020 Feb; 26(2):257-273. PubMed ID: 31331259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. On testing the face validity of planning/problem-solving tasks in a normal population.
    Kafer KL; Hunter M
    J Int Neuropsychol Soc; 1997 Mar; 3(2):108-19. PubMed ID: 9126852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Individual differences in cognitive planning on the Tower of Hanoi task: neuropsychological maturity or measurement error?
    Bishop DV; Aamodt-Leeper G; Creswell C; McGurk R; Skuse DH
    J Child Psychol Psychiatry; 2001 May; 42(4):551-6. PubMed ID: 11383971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Raising the ceiling: the Tower of London--extended version.
    Raizner RD
    Dev Neuropsychol; 2002; 21(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 12058833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The Tower of London and neuropsychological assessment of ADHD in adults.
    Riccio CA; Wolfe ME; Romine C; Davis B; Sullivan JR
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2004 Aug; 19(5):661-71. PubMed ID: 15271410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Planning abilities and the Tower of London: is this task measuring a discrete cognitive function?
    Unterrainer JM; Rahm B; Kaller CP; Leonhart R; Quiske K; Hoppe-Seyler K; Meier C; Müller C; Halsband U
    J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2004 Sep; 26(6):846-56. PubMed ID: 15370380
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Deficits in planning time but not performance in patients with multiple sclerosis.
    Denney DR; Hughes AJ; Owens EM; Lynch SG
    Arch Clin Neuropsychol; 2012 Mar; 27(2):148-58. PubMed ID: 22172566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Planning in Parkinson's disease: a matter of problem structure?
    McKinlay A; Kaller CP; Grace RC; Dalrymple-Alford JC; Anderson TJ; Fink J; Roger D
    Neuropsychologia; 2008 Jan; 46(1):384-9. PubMed ID: 17928014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.