These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

248 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21859231)

  • 1. What limits working memory capacity? Evidence for modality-specific sources to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays.
    Fougnie D; Marois R
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2011 Nov; 37(6):1329-41. PubMed ID: 21859231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dual-task interference in visual working memory: a limitation in storage capacity but not in encoding or retrieval.
    Fougnie D; Marois R
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Nov; 71(8):1831-41. PubMed ID: 19933566
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Working memory storage is intrinsically domain specific.
    Fougnie D; Zughni S; Godwin D; Marois R
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2015 Feb; 144(1):30-47. PubMed ID: 25384164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A central capacity limit to the simultaneous storage of visual and auditory arrays in working memory.
    Saults JS; Cowan N
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2007 Nov; 136(4):663-84. PubMed ID: 17999578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. What happens to an individual visual working memory representation when it is interrupted?
    Bae GY; Luck SJ
    Br J Psychol; 2019 May; 110(2):268-287. PubMed ID: 30069870
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The Effect of modality specific interference on working memory in recalling aversive auditory and visual memories
    Matthijssen SJMA; van Schie K; van den Hout MA
    Cogn Emot; 2019 Sep; 33(6):1169-1180. PubMed ID: 30465479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Unimodal and Bimodal Access to Sensory Working Memories by Auditory and Visual Impulses.
    Wolff MJ; Kandemir G; Stokes MG; Akyürek EG
    J Neurosci; 2020 Jan; 40(3):671-681. PubMed ID: 31754009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Comparable mechanisms of working memory interference by auditory and visual motion in youth and aging.
    Mishra J; Zanto T; Nilakantan A; Gazzaley A
    Neuropsychologia; 2013 Aug; 51(10):1896-906. PubMed ID: 23791629
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Polymorphisms in the 5-HTTLPR gene mediate storage capacity of visual working memory.
    Anderson DE; Bell TA; Awh E
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2012 May; 24(5):1069-76. PubMed ID: 22332803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Is working memory storage intrinsically domain-specific?
    Uittenhove K; Chaabi L; Camos V; Barrouillet P
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2019 Nov; 148(11):2027-2057. PubMed ID: 30829525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The Sources of Dual-task Costs in Multisensory Working Memory Tasks.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2019 Feb; 31(2):175-185. PubMed ID: 30277430
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Domain-general and domain-specific functional networks in working memory.
    Li D; Christ SE; Cowan N
    Neuroimage; 2014 Nov; 102 Pt 2(0 2):646-56. PubMed ID: 25178986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Interference within the focus of attention: working memory tasks reflect more than temporary maintenance.
    Shipstead Z; Engle RW
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2013 Jan; 39(1):277-89. PubMed ID: 22612165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Independent Attention Mechanisms Control the Activation of Tactile and Visual Working Memory Representations.
    Katus T; Eimer M
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2018 May; 30(5):644-655. PubMed ID: 29346019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Dissociating central and auditory attention: Is there a shared bottleneck for response selection and auditory search?
    Kattner F; Reimer CB
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2020 Oct; 73(10):1564-1574. PubMed ID: 32419615
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Auditory temporal preparation induced by rhythmic cues during concurrent auditory working memory tasks.
    Cutanda D; Correa Á; Sanabria D
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2015 Jun; 41(3):790-7. PubMed ID: 25893682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Visual and central attention share a capacity limitation when the demands for serial item selection in visual search are high.
    Reimer CB; Schubert T
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Feb; 82(2):715-728. PubMed ID: 31974939
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Electrophysiological evidence supports the role of sustained visuospatial attention in maintaining visual WM contents.
    Liang T; Chen X; Ye C; Zhang J; Liu Q
    Int J Psychophysiol; 2019 Dec; 146():54-62. PubMed ID: 31639381
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. The working memory stroop effect: when internal representations clash with external stimuli.
    Kiyonaga A; Egner T
    Psychol Sci; 2014 Aug; 25(8):1619-29. PubMed ID: 24958685
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Eliminating dual-task costs by minimizing crosstalk between tasks: The role of modality and feature pairings.
    Göthe K; Oberauer K; Kliegl R
    Cognition; 2016 May; 150():92-108. PubMed ID: 26878090
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 13.