267 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21859363)
1. The effects of different sperm preparation methods and incubation time on the sperm DNA fragmentation.
Zhang XD; Chen MY; Gao Y; Han W; Liu DY; Huang GN
Hum Fertil (Camb); 2011 Sep; 14(3):187-91. PubMed ID: 21859363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Microfluidic sorting selects sperm for clinical use with reduced DNA damage compared to density gradient centrifugation with swim-up in split semen samples.
Quinn MM; Jalalian L; Ribeiro S; Ona K; Demirci U; Cedars MI; Rosen MP
Hum Reprod; 2018 Aug; 33(8):1388-1393. PubMed ID: 30007319
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Prolonged incubation of processed human spermatozoa will increase DNA fragmentation.
Nabi A; Khalili MA; Halvaei I; Roodbari F
Andrologia; 2014 May; 46(4):374-9. PubMed ID: 24689689
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation in domestic animals II. The stallion.
López-Fernández C; Crespo F; Arroyo F; Fernández JL; Arana P; Johnston SD; Gosálvez J
Theriogenology; 2007 Dec; 68(9):1240-50. PubMed ID: 17919715
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sperm DNA fragmentation in boars is delayed or abolished by using sperm extenders.
Pérez-Llano B; Enciso M; García-Casado P; Sala R; Gosálvez J
Theriogenology; 2006 Dec; 66(9):2137-43. PubMed ID: 16956655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The influence of cryopreservation and seminal plasma on the chromatin structure of dog spermatozoa.
Koderle M; Aurich C; Schäfer-Somi S
Theriogenology; 2009 Dec; 72(9):1215-20. PubMed ID: 19766298
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Sperm chromatin structural integrity in normospermic boars is not related to semen storage and fertility after routine AI.
Waberski D; Schapmann E; Henning H; Riesenbeck A; Brandt H
Theriogenology; 2011 Jan; 75(2):337-45. PubMed ID: 20961609
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Sperm chromatin structure assay parameters measured after density gradient centrifugation are not predictive for the outcome of ART.
Bungum M; Spanò M; Humaidan P; Eleuteri P; Rescia M; Giwercman A
Hum Reprod; 2008 Jan; 23(1):4-10. PubMed ID: 17986484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Influence of temperature and sperm preparation on the quality of spermatozoa.
Thijssen A; Klerkx E; Huyser C; Bosmans E; Campo R; Ombelet W
Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Apr; 28(4):436-42. PubMed ID: 24581990
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Influence of semen preservation and processing methods on sperm DNA integrity].
Zheng YC; Liang JY; Du P; Mo GZ; Wang LH; Liu FH
Zhonghua Nan Ke Xue; 2016 May; 22(5):432-6. PubMed ID: 27416668
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Semen preparation methods and sperm apoptosis: swim-up versus gradient-density centrifugation technique.
Ricci G; Perticarari S; Boscolo R; Montico M; Guaschino S; Presani G
Fertil Steril; 2009 Feb; 91(2):632-8. PubMed ID: 18206147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Prospective controlled trial of an electrophoretic method of sperm preparation for assisted reproduction: comparison with density gradient centrifugation.
Fleming SD; Ilad RS; Griffin AM; Wu Y; Ong KJ; Smith HC; Aitken RJ
Hum Reprod; 2008 Dec; 23(12):2646-51. PubMed ID: 18765400
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dynamics of sperm DNA fragmentation in domestic animals III. Ram.
López-Fernández C; Fernández JL; Gosálbez A; Arroyo F; Vázquez JM; Holt WV; Gosálvez J
Theriogenology; 2008 Oct; 70(6):898-908. PubMed ID: 18597840
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Effects of sperm preparation techniques on sperm survivability and DNA fragmentation.
Le MT; Dang HNT; Nguyen TV; Nguyen TTT; Nguyen QHV; Cao NT
J Int Med Res; 2022 May; 50(5):3000605221097492. PubMed ID: 35545843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Analysis of selected sperm by density gradient centrifugation might aid in the estimation of in vivo fertility of thawed ram spermatozoa.
García-Alvarez O; Maroto-Morales A; Ramón M; del Olmo E; Montoro V; Dominguez-Rebolledo AE; Bisbal A; Jiménez-Rabadán P; Pérez-Guzmán MD; Soler AJ
Theriogenology; 2010 Oct; 74(6):979-88. PubMed ID: 20580077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Effects of semen storage and separation techniques on sperm DNA fragmentation.
Jackson RE; Bormann CL; Hassun PA; Rocha AM; Motta EL; Serafini PC; Smith GD
Fertil Steril; 2010 Dec; 94(7):2626-30. PubMed ID: 20542505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Histone methylation and acetylation in ejaculated human sperm: effects of swim-up and smoking.
Kim SK; Jee BC; Kim SH
Fertil Steril; 2015 Jun; 103(6):1425-31. PubMed ID: 25910569
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparative study on density gradients and swim-up preparation techniques utilizing neat and cryopreserved spermatozoa.
Allamaneni SS; Agarwal A; Rama S; Ranganathan P; Sharma RK
Asian J Androl; 2005 Mar; 7(1):86-92. PubMed ID: 15685358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Temperature controlled centrifugation improves sperm retrieval.
Franken DR; van Wyk R; Stoumann C; Avari K
Andrologia; 2011 Jun; 43(3):217-21. PubMed ID: 21561464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Changes in the structures of motile sperm subpopulations in dog spermatozoa after both cryopreservation and centrifugation on PureSperm(®) gradient.
Dorado J; Alcaráz L; Duarte N; Portero JM; Acha D; Hidalgo M
Anim Reprod Sci; 2011 May; 125(1-4):211-8. PubMed ID: 21530113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
