157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21859594)
1. Enhancing impedance imaging through multimodal tomography.
Gürsoy D; Mamatjan Y; Adler A; Scharfetter H
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2011 Nov; 58(11):3215-24. PubMed ID: 21859594
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
Merwa R; Hollaus K; Brunner P; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S241-50. PubMed ID: 15798237
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Induced current magnetic resonance-electrical impedance tomography.
Ozparlak L; Ider YZ
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S289-305. PubMed ID: 15798242
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Reconstruction of the shape of conductivity spectra using differential multi-frequency magnetic induction tomography.
Brunner P; Merwa R; Missner A; Rosell J; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S237-48. PubMed ID: 16636414
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A new type of gradiometer for the receiving circuit of magnetic induction tomography (MIT).
Scharfetter H; Merwa R; Pilz K
Physiol Meas; 2005 Apr; 26(2):S307-18. PubMed ID: 15798243
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Imaging of conductivity changes and electrode movement in EIT.
Soleimani M; Gómez-Laberge C; Adler A
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S103-13. PubMed ID: 16636402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Comparison of applied and induced current electrical impedance tomography.
Tanguay LF; Gagnon H; Guardo R
IEEE Trans Biomed Eng; 2007 Sep; 54(9):1643-9. PubMed ID: 17867356
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Magnetic resonance electrical impedance tomography (MREIT) for high-resolution conductivity imaging.
Woo EJ; Seo JK
Physiol Meas; 2008 Oct; 29(10):R1-26. PubMed ID: 18799834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Solution of the inverse problem of magnetic induction tomography (MIT) with multiple objects: analysis of detectability and statistical properties with respect to the reconstructed conducting region.
Merwa R; Brunner P; Missner A; Hollaus K; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S249-59. PubMed ID: 16636415
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Factors limiting the application of electrical impedance tomography for identification of regional conductivity changes using scalp electrodes during epileptic seizures in humans.
Fabrizi L; Sparkes M; Horesh L; Perez-Juste Abascal JF; McEwan A; Bayford RH; Elwes R; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2006 May; 27(5):S163-74. PubMed ID: 16636408
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Electromagnetic impedance tomography (EMIT): a new method for impedance imaging.
Levy S; Adam D; Bresler Y
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2002 Jun; 21(6):676-87. PubMed ID: 12166865
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Electrical impedance tomography of human brain function using reconstruction algorithms based on the finite element method.
Bagshaw AP; Liston AD; Bayford RH; Tizzard A; Gibson AP; Tidswell AT; Sparkes MK; Dehghani H; Binnie CD; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2003 Oct; 20(2):752-64. PubMed ID: 14568449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Evaluation of different stimulation and measurement patterns based on internal electrode: application in cardiac impedance tomography.
Nasehi Tehrani J; Oh TI; Jin C; Thiagalingam A; McEwan A
Comput Biol Med; 2012 Nov; 42(11):1122-32. PubMed ID: 23017828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Use of anisotropic modelling in electrical impedance tomography: description of method and preliminary assessment of utility in imaging brain function in the adult human head.
Abascal JF; Arridge SR; Atkinson D; Horesh R; Fabrizi L; De Lucia M; Horesh L; Bayford RH; Holder DS
Neuroimage; 2008 Nov; 43(2):258-68. PubMed ID: 18694835
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. A modelling study to inform specification and optimal electrode placement for imaging of neuronal depolarization during visual evoked responses by electrical and magnetic detection impedance tomography.
Gilad O; Horesh L; Holder DS
Physiol Meas; 2009 Jun; 30(6):S201-24. PubMed ID: 19491442
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Image reconstruction of conductivity on magnetoacoustic tomography with magnetic induction].
Li J; Yin T; Liu Z; Xu G
Sheng Wu Yi Xue Gong Cheng Xue Za Zhi; 2010 Apr; 27(2):416-20. PubMed ID: 20481330
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Magnetic induction tomography: evaluation of the point spread function and analysis of resolution and image distortion.
Merwa R; Scharfetter H
Physiol Meas; 2007 Jul; 28(7):S313-24. PubMed ID: 17664646
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Electrical impedance tomography for piecewise constant domains using boundary element shape-based inverse solutions.
Babaeizadeh S; Brooks DH
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 2007 May; 26(5):637-47. PubMed ID: 17518058
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Electrical impedance tomography using induced currents.
Gencer NG; Kuzuoglu M; Ider YZ
IEEE Trans Med Imaging; 1994; 13(2):338-50. PubMed ID: 18218510
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Design of a microscopic electrical impedance tomography system using two current injections.
Liu Q; Oh TI; Wi H; Lee EJ; Seo JK; Woo EJ
Physiol Meas; 2011 Sep; 32(9):1505-16. PubMed ID: 21828912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
