These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21859618)

  • 1. Two-dimensional approach to full-reference image quality assessment based on positional structural information.
    Capodiferro L; Jacovitti G; Di Claudio ED
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Feb; 21(2):505-16. PubMed ID: 21859618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. No-reference image quality assessment using visual codebooks.
    Ye P; Doermann D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jul; 21(7):3129-38. PubMed ID: 22410336
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A psychovisual quality metric in free-energy principle.
    Zhai G; Wu X; Yang X; Lin W; Zhang W
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Jan; 21(1):41-52. PubMed ID: 21724508
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Spread spectrum image watermarking based on perceptual quality metric.
    Zhang F; Liu W; Lin W; Ngan KN
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Nov; 20(11):3207-18. PubMed ID: 21518660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Universal blind image quality assessment metrics via natural scene statistics and multiple kernel learning.
    Gao X; Gao F; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Neural Netw Learn Syst; 2013 Dec; 24(12):2013-26. PubMed ID: 24805219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Quality image metrics for synthetic images based on perceptual color differences.
    Albin S; Rougeron G; Péroche B; Trémeau A
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2002; 11(9):961-71. PubMed ID: 18249719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Response of single benthic metrics and multi-metric methods to anthropogenic pressure gradients, in five distinct European coastal and transitional ecosystems.
    Borja A; Barbone E; Basset A; Borgersen G; Brkljacic M; Elliott M; Garmendia JM; Marques JC; Mazik K; Muxika I; Magalhães Neto J; Norling K; Rodríguez JG; Rosati I; Rygg B; Teixeira H; Trayanova A
    Mar Pollut Bull; 2011 Mar; 62(3):499-513. PubMed ID: 21215975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A full-reference quality metric for geometrically distorted images.
    D'Angelo A; Zhaoping L; Barni M
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2010 Apr; 19(4):867-81. PubMed ID: 19887314
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Blind image quality assessment: from natural scene statistics to perceptual quality.
    Moorthy AK; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Dec; 20(12):3350-64. PubMed ID: 21521667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A boosting framework for visuality-preserving distance metric learning and its application to medical image retrieval.
    Yang L; Jin R; Mummert L; Sukthankar R; Goode A; Zheng B; Hoi SC; Satyanarayanan M
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2010 Jan; 32(1):30-44. PubMed ID: 19926897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Image quality assessment based on multiscale geometric analysis.
    Gao X; Lu W; Tao D; Li X
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2009 Jul; 18(7):1409-23. PubMed ID: 19447715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Hybrid no-reference natural image quality assessment of noisy, blurry, JPEG2000, and JPEG images.
    Shen J; Li Q; Erlebacher G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Aug; 20(8):2089-98. PubMed ID: 21278018
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. SVD-based quality metric for image and video using machine learning.
    Narwaria M; Lin W
    IEEE Trans Syst Man Cybern B Cybern; 2012 Apr; 42(2):347-64. PubMed ID: 21965214
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Image quality assessment by visual gradient similarity.
    Zhu J; Wang N
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Mar; 21(3):919-33. PubMed ID: 21965204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. FSIM: a feature similarity index for image quality assessment.
    Zhang L; Zhang L; Mou X; Zhang D
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2011 Aug; 20(8):2378-86. PubMed ID: 21292594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A coherent computational approach to model bottom-up visual attention.
    Le Meur O; Le Callet P; Barba D; Thoreau D
    IEEE Trans Pattern Anal Mach Intell; 2006 May; 28(5):802-17. PubMed ID: 16640265
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. MIQM: a multicamera image quality measure.
    Solh M; AlRegib G
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Sep; 21(9):3902-14. PubMed ID: 22645264
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Information theoretic approach for assessing image fidelity in photon-counting arrays.
    Narravula SR; Hayat MM; Javidi B
    Opt Express; 2010 Feb; 18(3):2449-66. PubMed ID: 20174073
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. No-Reference Quality Metric of Contrast-Distorted Images Based on Information Maximization.
    Gu K; Lin W; Zhai G; Yang X; Zhang W; Chen CW
    IEEE Trans Cybern; 2017 Dec; 47(12):4559-4565. PubMed ID: 27323391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. RRED indices: reduced reference entropic differencing for image quality assessment.
    Soundararajan R; Bovik AC
    IEEE Trans Image Process; 2012 Feb; 21(2):517-26. PubMed ID: 21878414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 4.