184 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21859912)
1. Clinical prediction rules for children: a systematic review.
Maguire JL; Kulik DM; Laupacis A; Kuppermann N; Uleryk EM; Parkin PC
Pediatrics; 2011 Sep; 128(3):e666-77. PubMed ID: 21859912
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Does this child have bacterial meningitis? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules for children with suspected bacterial meningitis.
Kulik DM; Uleryk EM; Maguire JL
J Emerg Med; 2013 Oct; 45(4):508-19. PubMed ID: 23910166
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Should a head-injured child receive a head CT scan? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules.
Maguire JL; Boutis K; Uleryk EM; Laupacis A; Parkin PC
Pediatrics; 2009 Jul; 124(1):e145-54. PubMed ID: 19564261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Does this child have appendicitis? A systematic review of clinical prediction rules for children with acute abdominal pain.
Kulik DM; Uleryk EM; Maguire JL
J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Jan; 66(1):95-104. PubMed ID: 23177898
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Systematic review with meta-analyses and critical appraisal of clinical prediction rules for pulmonary tuberculosis in hospitals.
Gonçalves Bd; Lambert Passos SR; Borges Dos Santos MA; de Andrade CA; Moreira Martins Mde F; de Queiroz Mello FC
Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol; 2015 Feb; 36(2):204-13. PubMed ID: 25633004
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Clinical prediction rules for prognosis and treatment prescription in neck pain: A systematic review.
Kelly J; Ritchie C; Sterling M
Musculoskelet Sci Pract; 2017 Feb; 27():155-164. PubMed ID: 27852530
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Critical appraisal of clinical prediction rules that aim to optimize treatment selection for musculoskeletal conditions.
Stanton TR; Hancock MJ; Maher CG; Koes BW
Phys Ther; 2010 Jun; 90(6):843-54. PubMed ID: 20413577
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Validation and impact analysis of prognostic clinical prediction rules for low back pain is needed: a systematic review.
Haskins R; Osmotherly PG; Rivett DA
J Clin Epidemiol; 2015 Jul; 68(7):821-32. PubMed ID: 25804336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Impact analysis studies of clinical prediction rules relevant to primary care: a systematic review.
Wallace E; Uijen MJ; Clyne B; Zarabzadeh A; Keogh C; Galvin R; Smith SM; Fahey T
BMJ Open; 2016 Mar; 6(3):e009957. PubMed ID: 27008685
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Translation of clinical prediction rules for febrile children to primary care practice: an observational cohort study.
van Ierland Y; Elshout G; Berger MY; Vergouwe Y; de Wilde M; van der Lei J; Mol HA; Oostenbrink R
Br J Gen Pract; 2015 Apr; 65(633):e224-33. PubMed ID: 25824182
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Predictors for independent external validation of cardiovascular risk clinical prediction rules: Cox proportional hazards regression analyses.
Ban JW; Stevens R; Perera R
Diagn Progn Res; 2018; 2():3. PubMed ID: 31093553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Diagnostic clinical prediction rules for categorising low back pain: A systematic review.
Hill CJ; Banerjee A; Hill J; Stapleton C
Musculoskeletal Care; 2023 Dec; 21(4):1482-1496. PubMed ID: 37807828
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Clinical prediction rules in the physiotherapy management of low back pain: a systematic review.
Haskins R; Rivett DA; Osmotherly PG
Man Ther; 2012 Feb; 17(1):9-21. PubMed ID: 21641849
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Clinical Prediction Rules for Appendicitis in Adults: Which Is Best?
Kularatna M; Lauti M; Haran C; MacFater W; Sheikh L; Huang Y; McCall J; MacCormick AD
World J Surg; 2017 Jul; 41(7):1769-1781. PubMed ID: 28258458
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Clinical Prediction Rules That Don't Hold Up-Where to Go From Here?
Stanton TR
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2016 Jul; 46(7):502-5. PubMed ID: 27363570
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Diagnostic performance of clinical prediction rules to detect group A beta-haemolytic streptococci in people with acute pharyngitis: a systematic review.
Bakhit M; Gamage SK; Atkins T; Glasziou P; Hoffmann T; Jones M; Sanders S
Public Health; 2024 Feb; 227():219-227. PubMed ID: 38241903
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Clinical prediction rules for physical therapy interventions: a systematic review.
Beneciuk JM; Bishop MD; George SZ
Phys Ther; 2009 Feb; 89(2):114-24. PubMed ID: 19095806
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Diagnostic clinical prediction rules for specific subtypes of low back pain: a systematic review.
Haskins R; Osmotherly PG; Rivett DA
J Orthop Sports Phys Ther; 2015 Feb; 45(2):61-76, A1-4. PubMed ID: 25573009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Prescriptive clinical prediction rules in back pain research: a systematic review.
May S; Rosedale R
J Man Manip Ther; 2009; 17(1):36-45. PubMed ID: 20046564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Why do authors derive new cardiovascular clinical prediction rules in the presence of existing rules? A mixed methods study.
Ban JW; Wallace E; Stevens R; Perera R
PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179102. PubMed ID: 28591223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
