These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2186064)

  • 1. Performance characteristics of an eight-ring whole body PET scanner.
    Rota Kops E; Herzog H; Schmid A; Holte S; Feinendegen LE
    J Comput Assist Tomogr; 1990; 14(3):437-45. PubMed ID: 2186064
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Three-dimensional imaging characteristics of the HEAD PENN-PET scanner.
    Karp JS; Freifelder R; Geagan MJ; Muehllehner G; Kinahan PE; Lewitt RM; Shao L
    J Nucl Med; 1997 Apr; 38(4):636-43. PubMed ID: 9098216
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Performance evaluation of a large axial field-of-view PET scanner: SET-2400W.
    Fujiwara T; Watanuki S; Yamamoto S; Miyake M; Seo S; Itoh M; Ishii K; Orihara H; Fukuda H; Satoh T; Kitamura K; Tanaka K; Takahashi S
    Ann Nucl Med; 1997 Nov; 11(4):307-13. PubMed ID: 9460522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Imaging characteristics of a 3-dimensional GSO whole-body PET camera.
    Surti S; Karp JS
    J Nucl Med; 2004 Jun; 45(6):1040-9. PubMed ID: 15181139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance evaluation of a whole-body PET scanner using the NEMA protocol. National Electrical Manufacturers Association.
    Brix G; Zaers J; Adam LE; Bellemann ME; Ostertag H; Trojan H; Haberkorn U; Doll J; Oberdorfer F; Lorenz WJ
    J Nucl Med; 1997 Oct; 38(10):1614-23. PubMed ID: 9379202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Performance of a whole-body PET scanner using curve-plate NaI(Tl) detectors.
    Adam LE; Karp JS; Daube-Witherspoon ME; Smith RJ
    J Nucl Med; 2001 Dec; 42(12):1821-30. PubMed ID: 11752080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Evaluation of the performance of a whole-body positron imaging system with attenuation correction.
    Ota T; Ito K; Tadokoro M; Kato T; Nishino M; Amano M; Ishigaki T
    Radiat Med; 1995; 13(3):121-8. PubMed ID: 7569003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A comparison of three commercially available PET imaging systems.
    Batchelor S; Blake GM; Saunders JE
    Nucl Med Commun; 1992 Jan; 13(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 1594165
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Correction and characterization of scattered events in three-dimensional PET using scanners with retractable septa.
    Cherry SR; Meikle SR; Hoffman EJ
    J Nucl Med; 1993 Apr; 34(4):671-8. PubMed ID: 8455087
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Whole-body positron emission tomography: Part I. Methods and performance characteristics.
    Dahlbom M; Hoffman EJ; Hoh CK; Schiepers C; Rosenqvist G; Hawkins RA; Phelps ME
    J Nucl Med; 1992 Jun; 33(6):1191-9. PubMed ID: 1597738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Performance characteristics of a whole-body PET scanner.
    DeGrado TR; Turkington TG; Williams JJ; Stearns CW; Hoffman JM; Coleman RE
    J Nucl Med; 1994 Aug; 35(8):1398-406. PubMed ID: 8046501
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Segmented attenuation correction using artificial neural networks in positron tomography.
    Yu SK; Nahmias C
    Phys Med Biol; 1996 Oct; 41(10):2189-206. PubMed ID: 8912390
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Spatially dependent deadtime losses in high count rate cardiac PET.
    Freedman NM; Bacharach SL; McCord ME; Bonow RO
    J Nucl Med; 1992 Dec; 33(12):2226-31. PubMed ID: 1460521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Performance evaluation of microPET: a high-resolution lutetium oxyorthosilicate PET scanner for animal imaging.
    Chatziioannou AF; Cherry SR; Shao Y; Silverman RW; Meadors K; Farquhar TH; Pedarsani M; Phelps ME
    J Nucl Med; 1999 Jul; 40(7):1164-75. PubMed ID: 10405138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The effect of activity outside the direct field of view in a 3D-only whole-body positron tomograph.
    Spinks TJ; Miller MP; Bailey DL; Bloomfield PM; Livieratos L; Jones T
    Phys Med Biol; 1998 Apr; 43(4):895-904. PubMed ID: 9572513
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Performance evaluation of the 32-module quadHIDAC small-animal PET scanner.
    Schäfers KP; Reader AJ; Kriens M; Knoess C; Schober O; Schäfers M
    J Nucl Med; 2005 Jun; 46(6):996-1004. PubMed ID: 15937311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Influence of some instrumental parameters on the determination of quantitative data using the PET scanner PC4096-15WB.
    Rota Kops E; Herzog H; Schmid A; Winkens A; Dick R; Feinendegen LE
    Eur J Nucl Med; 1989; 15(11):701-4. PubMed ID: 2583196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. An animal PET scanner using flat-panel position-sensitive PMTs.
    Okamoto T; Ote K; Sakai K; Noda A; Shimizu K; Masuda K; Ohmura T; Watanabe M
    Ann Nucl Med; 2014 Jan; 28(1):74-80. PubMed ID: 24078320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. [Design concepts and preliminary performances of stationary-sampling whole-body high-resolution positron emission tomography: HEADTOME IV].
    Kanno I; Iida H; Miura S; Yamamoto S; Amano M; Hirose Y; Murakami M; Takahashi K; Sasaki H; Shishido F
    Kaku Igaku; 1989 Apr; 26(4):477-85. PubMed ID: 2788759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Performance evaluation of the microPET R4 PET scanner for rodents.
    Knoess C; Siegel S; Smith A; Newport D; Richerzhagen N; Winkeler A; Jacobs A; Goble RN; Graf R; Wienhard K; Heiss WD
    Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 May; 30(5):737-47. PubMed ID: 12536244
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.