These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2186077)

  • 1. Vinyl polysiloxane impression materials: a status report. Council on Dental Materials, Instruments, and Equipment.
    J Am Dent Assoc; 1990 May; 120(5):595-6, 598, 600. PubMed ID: 2186077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The effect of one-step vs. two-step impression techniques on long-term accuracy and dimensional stability when the finish line is within the gingival sulcular area.
    Levartovsky S; Zalis M; Pilo R; Harel N; Ganor Y; Brosh T
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Feb; 23(2):124-33. PubMed ID: 23734561
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Evaluation of accuracy of casts of multiple internal connection implant prosthesis obtained from different impression materials and techniques: an in vitro study.
    Pujari M; Garg P; Prithviraj DR
    J Oral Implantol; 2014 Apr; 40(2):137-45. PubMed ID: 24456531
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. [The study on surface porosity of die stone. Influence of vinyl polysiloxane impression materials].
    Okuda N; Ueno S; Kawada E; Nakanishi K; Sumii T
    Shikwa Gakuho; 1990 Feb; 90(2):225-30. PubMed ID: 2135095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. An in vitro study on the dimensional stability of a vinyl polyether silicone impression material over a prolonged storage period.
    Nassar U; Oko A; Adeeb S; El-Rich M; Flores-Mir C
    J Prosthet Dent; 2013 Mar; 109(3):172-8. PubMed ID: 23522366
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Dimensional accuracy and detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under different conditions.
    Katyayan PA; Kalavathy N; Katyayan M
    Indian J Dent Res; 2011; 22(6):881-2. PubMed ID: 22484900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of the accuracy of polyether, polyvinyl siloxane, and plaster impressions for long-span implant-supported prostheses.
    Hoods-Moonsammy VJ; Owen P; Howes DG
    Int J Prosthodont; 2014; 27(5):433-8. PubMed ID: 25191885
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A one-step putty-wash impression technique utilizing vinyl polysiloxanes.
    Pameijer CH
    Quintessence Int Dent Dig; 1983 Aug; 14(8):861-3. PubMed ID: 6374732
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dimensional accuracy and surface detail reproduction of two hydrophilic vinyl polysiloxane impression materials tested under dry, moist, and wet conditions.
    Petrie CS; Walker MP; O'mahony AM; Spencer P
    J Prosthet Dent; 2003 Oct; 90(4):365-72. PubMed ID: 14564291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Accuracy of three implant impression techniques with different impression materials and stones.
    Chang WG; Vahidi F; Bae KH; Lim BS
    Int J Prosthodont; 2012; 25(1):44-7. PubMed ID: 22259795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Accuracy of a reformulated fast-set vinyl polysiloxane impression material using dual-arch trays.
    Kang AH; Johnson GH; Lepe X; Wataha JC
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 May; 101(5):332-41. PubMed ID: 19410067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. A simplified reliable impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Pameijer CH
    J Conn State Dent Assoc; 1983 Oct; 57(4):159-60. PubMed ID: 6421899
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The effect of the type and technique used for impression making on the accuracy of elastomeric impression materials.
    Habib AN; Shehata MT
    Egypt Dent J; 1995 Oct; 41(4):1409-16. PubMed ID: 9497690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparative Study of Dimensional Stability and Detail Reproduction of Reformulated and Nonreformulated Elastomeric Impression Materials.
    Aivatzidou K; Kamalakidis SN; Emmanouil I; Michalakis K; Pissiotis AL
    J Prosthodont; 2021 Apr; 30(4):345-350. PubMed ID: 32875682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinically relevant mechanical properties of elastomeric impression materials.
    Chai J; Takahashi Y; Lautenschlager EP
    Int J Prosthodont; 1998; 11(3):219-23. PubMed ID: 9728115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. The influence of temperature on the dimensional stability of poly (vinyl siloxane) impression materials.
    Chew CL; Chee WW; Donovan TE
    Int J Prosthodont; 1993; 6(6):528-32. PubMed ID: 8148022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Working times of elastomeric impression materials according to dimensional stability and detail reproduction.
    Tan E; Chai J
    Int J Prosthodont; 1995; 8(6):541-7. PubMed ID: 8595114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modification of immediate denture sectional impression technique using vinyl polysiloxane.
    Gardner LK; Parr GR; Rahn AO
    J Prosthet Dent; 1990 Aug; 64(2):182-4. PubMed ID: 2202817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Surface porosity of stone casts made from vinyl polysiloxane impression materials.
    Dhuru VB; Asgharnia MK; Mayer JC; Hassan K
    Oper Dent; 1986; 11(1):3-7. PubMed ID: 3459135
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. A clinical comparison of two vinyl polysiloxane impression materials using the one-step technique.
    Raigrodski AJ; Dogan S; Mancl LA; Heindl H
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Sep; 102(3):179-86. PubMed ID: 19703625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.