These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
373 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21861232)
1. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers. Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery. Karanlik H; Ozgur I; Sahin D; Fayda M; Onder S; Yavuz E World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 13():321. PubMed ID: 26596699 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative ultrasound can decrease the re-excision lumpectomy rate in patients with palpable breast cancers. Davis KM; Hsu CH; Bouton ME; Wilhelmson KL; Komenaka IK Am Surg; 2011 Jun; 77(6):720-5. PubMed ID: 21679640 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasonography-guided breast-conserving surgery is superior to palpation-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer. Eggemann H; Ignatov T; Beni A; Costa SD; Ignatov A Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 24169374 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer. Ramos M; Díaz JC; Ramos T; Ruano R; Aparicio M; Sancho M; González-Orús JM Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 23110817 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery. Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery. Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy Versus Mammographic Wire Localization for Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Treatment. Rubio IT; Esgueva-Colmenarejo A; Espinosa-Bravo M; Salazar JP; Miranda I; Peg V Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 26514120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy in elderly women with breast cancer. Angarita FA; Acuna SA; McCready DR; Escallon J Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 29525464 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer. Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients. Coopey SB; Buckley JM; Smith BL; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Specht MC Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3036-40. PubMed ID: 21947583 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer. Moore MM; Whitney LA; Cerilli L; Imbrie JZ; Bunch M; Simpson VB; Hanks JB Ann Surg; 2001 Jun; 233(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 11371734 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer. Smitt MC; Horst K Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive Factors for Positive Margin and the Surgical Learning Curve in Non-Palpable Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Localization - Prospective Study of 214 Consecutive Patients. Tóth D; Varga Z; Sebő É; Török M; Kovács I Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Jan; 22(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 26522009 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of introducing an in-theatre intra-operative specimen radiography (IOSR) system on the management of palpable breast cancer within a single unit. Layfield DM; May DJ; Cutress RI; Richardson C; Agrawal A; Wise M; Yiangou C Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 22119488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT). Volders JH; Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Negenborn VL; Kolk RH; Lopes Cardozo AM; Bosch AM; de Widt-Levert LM; van der Veen H; Rijna H; Taets van Amerongen AH; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; van den Tol MP Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):649-657. PubMed ID: 27916314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy? Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer. Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins. Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]