378 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21861232)
1. Ultrasound-guided lumpectomy for palpable breast cancers.
Fisher CS; Mushawah FA; Cyr AE; Gao F; Margenthaler JA
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3198-203. PubMed ID: 21861232
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intraoperative ultrasound reduces the need for re-excision in breast-conserving surgery.
Karanlik H; Ozgur I; Sahin D; Fayda M; Onder S; Yavuz E
World J Surg Oncol; 2015 Nov; 13():321. PubMed ID: 26596699
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Intraoperative ultrasound can decrease the re-excision lumpectomy rate in patients with palpable breast cancers.
Davis KM; Hsu CH; Bouton ME; Wilhelmson KL; Komenaka IK
Am Surg; 2011 Jun; 77(6):720-5. PubMed ID: 21679640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Resection margins in ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Olsha O; Shemesh D; Carmon M; Sibirsky O; Abu Dalo R; Rivkin L; Ashkenazi I
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Feb; 18(2):447-52. PubMed ID: 20734147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Ultrasonography-guided breast-conserving surgery is superior to palpation-guided surgery for palpable breast cancer.
Eggemann H; Ignatov T; Beni A; Costa SD; Ignatov A
Clin Breast Cancer; 2014 Feb; 14(1):40-5. PubMed ID: 24169374
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Ultrasound-guided excision combined with intraoperative assessment of gross macroscopic margins decreases the rate of reoperations for non-palpable invasive breast cancer.
Ramos M; Díaz JC; Ramos T; Ruano R; Aparicio M; Sancho M; González-Orús JM
Breast; 2013 Aug; 22(4):520-4. PubMed ID: 23110817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Low re-excision rate for positive margins in patients treated with ultrasound-guided breast-conserving surgery.
Yu CC; Chiang KC; Kuo WL; Shen SC; Lo YF; Chen SC
Breast; 2013 Oct; 22(5):698-702. PubMed ID: 23333255
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The influence of additional surgical margins on the total specimen volume excised and the reoperative rate after breast-conserving surgery.
Huston TL; Pigalarga R; Osborne MP; Tousimis E
Am J Surg; 2006 Oct; 192(4):509-12. PubMed ID: 16978962
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Intraoperative Ultrasound-Guided Lumpectomy Versus Mammographic Wire Localization for Breast Cancer Patients After Neoadjuvant Treatment.
Rubio IT; Esgueva-Colmenarejo A; Espinosa-Bravo M; Salazar JP; Miranda I; Peg V
Ann Surg Oncol; 2016 Jan; 23(1):38-43. PubMed ID: 26514120
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Management of positive margins after initial lumpectomy in elderly women with breast cancer.
Angarita FA; Acuna SA; McCready DR; Escallon J
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2018 Jul; 44(7):1048-1053. PubMed ID: 29525464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The safety of multiple re-excisions after lumpectomy for breast cancer.
Coopey S; Smith BL; Hanson S; Buckley J; Hughes KS; Gadd M; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Dec; 18(13):3797-801. PubMed ID: 21630123
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Lumpectomy cavity shaved margins do not impact re-excision rates in breast cancer patients.
Coopey SB; Buckley JM; Smith BL; Hughes KS; Gadd MA; Specht MC
Ann Surg Oncol; 2011 Oct; 18(11):3036-40. PubMed ID: 21947583
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Intraoperative ultrasound is associated with clear lumpectomy margins for palpable infiltrating ductal breast cancer.
Moore MM; Whitney LA; Cerilli L; Imbrie JZ; Bunch M; Simpson VB; Hanks JB
Ann Surg; 2001 Jun; 233(6):761-8. PubMed ID: 11371734
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Association of clinical and pathologic variables with lumpectomy surgical margin status after preoperative diagnosis or excisional biopsy of invasive breast cancer.
Smitt MC; Horst K
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1040-4. PubMed ID: 17203329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Predictive Factors for Positive Margin and the Surgical Learning Curve in Non-Palpable Breast Cancer After Wire-Guided Localization - Prospective Study of 214 Consecutive Patients.
Tóth D; Varga Z; Sebő É; Török M; Kovács I
Pathol Oncol Res; 2016 Jan; 22(1):209-15. PubMed ID: 26522009
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The effect of introducing an in-theatre intra-operative specimen radiography (IOSR) system on the management of palpable breast cancer within a single unit.
Layfield DM; May DJ; Cutress RI; Richardson C; Agrawal A; Wise M; Yiangou C
Breast; 2012 Aug; 21(4):459-63. PubMed ID: 22119488
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Intraoperative ultrasound guidance in breast-conserving surgery shows superiority in oncological outcome, long-term cosmetic and patient-reported outcomes: Final outcomes of a randomized controlled trial (COBALT).
Volders JH; Haloua MH; Krekel NM; Negenborn VL; Kolk RH; Lopes Cardozo AM; Bosch AM; de Widt-Levert LM; van der Veen H; Rijna H; Taets van Amerongen AH; Jóźwiak K; Meijer S; van den Tol MP
Eur J Surg Oncol; 2017 Apr; 43(4):649-657. PubMed ID: 27916314
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Intra-operative touch preparation cytology; does it have a role in re-excision lumpectomy?
Valdes EK; Boolbol SK; Cohen JM; Feldman SM
Ann Surg Oncol; 2007 Mar; 14(3):1045-50. PubMed ID: 17206481
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Predictors of re-excision among women undergoing breast-conserving surgery for cancer.
Waljee JF; Hu ES; Newman LA; Alderman AK
Ann Surg Oncol; 2008 May; 15(5):1297-303. PubMed ID: 18259820
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The Relationship of Breast Density and Positive Lumpectomy Margins.
Gooch JC; Yoon E; Chun J; Kaplowitz E; Jubas T; Guth A; Axelrod D; Shapiro R; Darvishian F; Schnabel F
Ann Surg Oncol; 2019 Jun; 26(6):1729-1736. PubMed ID: 30888516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
