263 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21862079)
1. Human capital gains associated with robotic assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children compared to open pyeloplasty.
Behan JW; Kim SS; Dorey F; De Filippo RE; Chang AY; Hardy BE; Koh CJ
J Urol; 2011 Oct; 186(4 Suppl):1663-7. PubMed ID: 21862079
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Cost analysis of pediatric robot-assisted and laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Casella DP; Fox JA; Schneck FX; Cannon GM; Ost MC
J Urol; 2013 Mar; 189(3):1083-6. PubMed ID: 23017518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. National trends of perioperative outcomes and costs for open, laparoscopic and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty.
Varda BK; Johnson EK; Clark C; Chung BI; Nelson CP; Chang SL
J Urol; 2014 Apr; 191(4):1090-5. PubMed ID: 24513164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Transition from open to robotic-assisted pediatric pyeloplasty: a feasibility and outcome study.
O'Brien ST; Shukla AR
J Pediatr Urol; 2012 Jun; 8(3):276-81. PubMed ID: 21616719
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Robot-assisted vs laparoscopic pyeloplasty in children with uretero-pelvic junction obstruction (UPJO): technical considerations and results.
Esposito C; Masieri L; Castagnetti M; Sforza S; Farina A; Cerulo M; Cini C; Del Conte F; Escolino M
J Pediatr Urol; 2019 Dec; 15(6):667.e1-667.e8. PubMed ID: 31734119
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Head-to-Head Comparison of Modified Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty and Robot-Assisted Pyeloplasty for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in China.
Hong P; Ding G; Zhu D; Yang K; Pan J; Li X; Chen Z; Zhang L; Tang Q; Hao H; Zhou Z; Zhou L
Urol Int; 2018; 101(3):337-344. PubMed ID: 30231235
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Robotic Pyeloplasty.
Bergersen A; Thomas R; Lee BR
J Endourol; 2018 May; 32(S1):S68-S72. PubMed ID: 29774814
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Has the robot caught up? National trends in utilization, perioperative outcomes, and cost for open, laparoscopic, and robotic pediatric pyeloplasty in the United States from 2003 to 2015.
Varda BK; Wang Y; Chung BI; Lee RS; Kurtz MP; Nelson CP; Chang SL
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Aug; 14(4):336.e1-336.e8. PubMed ID: 29530407
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Parental satisfaction after open versus robot assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty: results from modified Glasgow Children's Benefit Inventory Survey.
Freilich DA; Penna FJ; Nelson CP; Retik AB; Nguyen HT
J Urol; 2010 Feb; 183(2):704-8. PubMed ID: 20022046
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Minimally invasive surgical management of pelvic-ureteric junction obstruction: update on the current status of robotic-assisted pyeloplasty.
Uberoi J; Disick GI; Munver R
BJU Int; 2009 Dec; 104(11):1722-9. PubMed ID: 19519760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. An innovative technique of robotic-assisted/laparoscopic re-pyeloplasty in horseshoe kidney in patients with failed previous pyeloplasty for ureteropelvic junction obstruction.
Khoder WY; Alghamdi A; Schulz T; Becker AJ; Schlenker B; Stief CG
Surg Endosc; 2016 Sep; 30(9):4124-9. PubMed ID: 26675936
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. From Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty to Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Primary and Reoperative Repairs for Ureteropelvic Junction Obstruction in Children.
Tam YH; Pang KKY; Wong YS; Chan KW; Lee KH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Aug; 28(8):1012-1018. PubMed ID: 29641368
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robotic laparoscopic pyeloplasty.
Chammas MF; Mitre AI; Hubert N; Egrot C; Hubert J
JSLS; 2014; 18(1):110-5. PubMed ID: 24680152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Laparoscopic reoperative pediatric pyeloplasty with robotic assistance.
Passerotti CC; Nguyen HT; Eisner BH; Lee RS; Peters CA
J Endourol; 2007 Oct; 21(10):1137-40. PubMed ID: 17949311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Comparison of the Learning Curve for Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty Between Senior and Junior Surgeons.
Spampinato G; Binet A; Fourcade L; Mendoza Sagaon M; Villemagne T; Braik K; Grosos C; Lardy H; Ballouhey Q
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2021 Apr; 31(4):478-483. PubMed ID: 33651635
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
16. Pyeloplasty in children: perioperative results and long-term outcomes of robotic-assisted laparoscopic surgery compared to open surgery.
Salö M; Sjöberg Altemani T; Anderberg M
Pediatr Surg Int; 2016 Jun; 32(6):599-607. PubMed ID: 26833312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in infants and children: is it superior to conventional laparoscopy?
Andolfi C; Adamic B; Oommen J; Gundeti MS
World J Urol; 2020 Aug; 38(8):1827-1833. PubMed ID: 31506749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Comparison of Robotic Pyeloplasty and Standard Laparoscopic Pyeloplasty in Infants: A Bi-Institutional Study.
Neheman A; Kord E; Zisman A; Darawsha AE; Noh PH
J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A; 2018 Apr; 28(4):467-470. PubMed ID: 29206567
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Does the use of 5 mm instruments affect the outcomes of robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty in smaller working spaces? A comparative analysis of infants and older children.
Baek M; Silay MS; Au JK; Huang GO; Elizondo RA; Puttmann KT; Janzen NK; Seth A; Roth DR; Koh CJ
J Pediatr Urol; 2018 Dec; 14(6):537.e1-537.e6. PubMed ID: 30007500
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Outcomes of infants undergoing robot-assisted laparoscopic pyeloplasty compared to open repair.
Dangle PP; Kearns J; Anderson B; Gundeti MS
J Urol; 2013 Dec; 190(6):2221-6. PubMed ID: 23911637
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]