These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Objective performance testing and quality assurance of medical ultrasound equipment. Thijssen JM; Weijers G; de Korte CL Ultrasound Med Biol; 2007 Mar; 33(3):460-71. PubMed ID: 17275983 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Effect of K-shell absorption edge filters on image quality in digital intraoral radiography. Shibuya H; Nishikawa K; Kuroyanagi K Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2000 Sep; 90(3):377-84. PubMed ID: 10982962 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Signal-to-noise ratios of 6 intraoral digital sensors. Attaelmanan AG; Borg E; Gröndahl HG Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2001 May; 91(5):611-5. PubMed ID: 11346743 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Quantitative assessment of computed radiography quality control parameters. Rampado O; Isoardi P; Ropolo R Phys Med Biol; 2006 Mar; 51(6):1577-93. PubMed ID: 16510964 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Comparison of methods for acceptance and constancy testing in dental cone-beam computed tomography. Steiding C; Kolditz D; Kalender W Rofo; 2015 Apr; 187(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 25389669 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Quality control phantom for digital chest radiography. Chotas HG; Floyd CE; Johnson GA; Ravin CE Radiology; 1997 Jan; 202(1):111-6. PubMed ID: 8988199 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of computer display performance on the quality of digital radiographs: a review. Butt A; Mahoney M; Savage NW Aust Dent J; 2012 Mar; 57 Suppl 1():16-23. PubMed ID: 22376093 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Performance evaluation and testing of digital intra-oral radiographic systems. Doyle P; Finney L Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):313-7. PubMed ID: 16461488 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Image quality performance of liquid crystal display systems: influence of display resolution, magnification and window settings on contrast-detail detection. Bacher K; Smeets P; De Hauwere A; Voet T; Duyck P; Verstraete K; Thierens H Eur J Radiol; 2006 Jun; 58(3):471-9. PubMed ID: 16442770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Effective and quality-controlled use of digital radiography in dental practice. Koch S; Wagner IV; Schneider W Int J Comput Dent; 2000 May; 3(2):107-18. PubMed ID: 11351550 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Is digital better in dental radiography? Zdesar U; Fortuna T; Valantic B; Skrk D Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2008; 129(1-3):138-9. PubMed ID: 18375462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Image-quality figure evaluator based on contrast-detail phantom in radiography. Wang CL; Wang CM; Chan YK; Chen RT Int J Med Robot; 2012 Jun; 8(2):169-77. PubMed ID: 22213357 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. [Investigation on the 3 D geometric accuracy and on the image quality (MTF, SNR and NPS) of volume tomography units (CT, CBCT and DVT)]. Blendl C; Fiebich M; Voigt JM; Selbach M; Uphoff C Rofo; 2012 Jan; 184(1):24-31. PubMed ID: 22076796 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Analysis of image quality in digital chest imaging. De Hauwere A; Bacher K; Smeets P; Verstraete K; Thierens H Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2005; 117(1-3):174-7. PubMed ID: 16461499 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]