124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21862367)
1. Changes in diameter, cross-sectional area, and extent of canal-wall touching on using 3 instrumentation techniques in long-oval canals.
Hilaly Eid GE; Wanees Amin SA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2011 Nov; 112(5):688-95. PubMed ID: 21862367
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Comparison of three techniques for preparing oval-shaped root canals.
Taha NA; Ozawa T; Messer HH
J Endod; 2010 Mar; 36(3):532-5. PubMed ID: 20171378
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Efficacy of rotary instruments with greater taper in preparing oval root canals.
Elayouti A; Chu AL; Kimionis I; Klein C; Weiger R; Löst C
Int Endod J; 2008 Dec; 41(12):1088-92. PubMed ID: 19133098
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Cross-sectional analysis of root canals prepared with NiTi rotary instruments and stainless steel reciprocating files.
Grande NM; Plotino G; Butti A; Messina F; Pameijer CH; Somma F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Jan; 103(1):120-6. PubMed ID: 17178505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A comparative study of root canal preparation with NiTi-TEE and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Jodway B; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2006 Jan; 39(1):71-80. PubMed ID: 16409331
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 2. Cleaning effectiveness and shaping ability in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):239-48. PubMed ID: 15056350
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Effectiveness in cleaning oval-shaped root canals using Anatomic Endodontic Technology, ProFile and manual instrumentation: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2005 Jun; 38(6):356-63. PubMed ID: 15910470
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. A comparison of the shaping abilities of 4 nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated root canals.
Yun HH; Kim SK
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2003 Feb; 95(2):228-33. PubMed ID: 12582365
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Ultrastructural morphologic evaluation of root canal walls prepared by two rotary nickel-titanium systems: a comparative study.
Sabet NE; Lutfy RA
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Sep; 106(3):e59-66. PubMed ID: 18602300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Preparation of oval-shaped root canals in mandibular molars using nickel-titanium rotary instruments: a micro-computed tomography study.
Paqué F; Balmer M; Attin T; Peters OA
J Endod; 2010 Apr; 36(4):703-7. PubMed ID: 20307747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Efficiency of hand and rotary instruments in shaping oval root canals.
Weiger R; ElAyouti A; Löst C
J Endod; 2002 Aug; 28(8):580-3. PubMed ID: 12184418
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The self-adjusting file optimizes debridement quality in oval-shaped root canals.
De-Deus G; Souza EM; Barino B; Maia J; Zamolyi RQ; Reis C; Kfir A
J Endod; 2011 May; 37(5):701-5. PubMed ID: 21496675
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparative investigation of two rotary nickel-titanium instruments: ProTaper versus RaCe. Part 1. Shaping ability in simulated curved canals.
Schäfer E; Vlassis M
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):229-38. PubMed ID: 15056349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Comparative investigation of 2 rotary nickel-titanium instruments: protaper universal versus protaper.
Unal GC; Maden M; Savgat A; Onur Orhan E
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Jun; 107(6):886-92. PubMed ID: 19386519
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Shaping potential of manual NiTi K-File and rotary ProTaper and analyzing the final outcome of shaped canals using CT.
Kakar S; Dhingra A; Sharma H
J Contemp Dent Pract; 2013 May; 14(3):451-5. PubMed ID: 24171988
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Cleaning efficacy using two engine-driven systems versus manual instrumentation in curved root canals: a scanning electron microscopic study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Alvarez Serrano S; Hernandez SR
J Endod; 2011 Sep; 37(9):1279-82. PubMed ID: 21846548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Influence of flexion angle of files on the decentralization of oval canals during instrumentation.
Oliveira MA; Alves LD; Pereira AG; Raposo LH; Biffi JC
Braz Oral Res; 2015; 29():. PubMed ID: 26083093
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Shaping ability of ProFile and K3 rotary Ni-Ti instruments when used in a variable tip sequence in simulated curved root canals.
Ayar LR; Love RM
Int Endod J; 2004 Sep; 37(9):593-601. PubMed ID: 15317562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. A comparison of instrumentation using Naviflex and Profile nickel-titanium engine-driven rotary instruments.
Ottosen SR; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1999 Jun; 25(6):457-60. PubMed ID: 10530251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Retreatment efficacy of hand versus automated instrumentation in oval-shaped root canals: an ex vivo study.
Zmener O; Pameijer CH; Banegas G
Int Endod J; 2006 Jul; 39(7):521-6. PubMed ID: 16776756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
