124 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21862367)
21. Comparison of root canal preparation using RaCe and ProTaper rotary Ni-Ti instruments.
Paqué F; Musch U; Hülsmann M
Int Endod J; 2005 Jan; 38(1):8-16. PubMed ID: 15606817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Cutting efficiency of twisted versus machined nickel-titanium endodontic files.
Fayyad DM; Elhakim Elgendy AA
J Endod; 2011 Aug; 37(8):1143-6. PubMed ID: 21763910
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Comparative evaluation of rotary ProTaper, Profile, and conventional stepback technique on reduction in Enterococcus faecalis colony-forming units and vertical root fracture resistance of root canals.
Singla M; Aggarwal V; Logani A; Shah N
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2010 Mar; 109(3):e105-10. PubMed ID: 20219574
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Ex vivo study of manual and rotary instrumentation techniques in human primary teeth.
Kummer TR; Calvo MC; Cordeiro MM; de Sousa Vieira R; de Carvalho Rocha MJ
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Apr; 105(4):e84-92. PubMed ID: 18329573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Canal transportation after root canal instrumentation: a comparative study with computed tomography.
Hartmann MS; Barletta FB; Camargo Fontanella VR; Vanni JR
J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):962-5. PubMed ID: 17878083
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Suboptimal debridement quality produced by the single-file F2 ProTaper technique in oval-shaped canals.
De-Deus G; Barino B; Zamolyi RQ; Souza E; Fonseca A; Fidel S; Fidel RA
J Endod; 2010 Nov; 36(11):1897-900. PubMed ID: 20951309
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A comparison of instrument-centering ability within the root canal for three contemporary instrumentation techniques.
Song YL; Bian Z; Fan B; Fan MW; Gutmann JL; Peng B
Int Endod J; 2004 Apr; 37(4):265-71. PubMed ID: 15056353
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Shaping ability of progressive versus constant taper instruments in simulated root canals.
Yang GB; Zhou XD; Zhang H; Wu HK
Int Endod J; 2006 Oct; 39(10):791-9. PubMed ID: 16948665
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Shaping ability of four nickel-titanium rotary instruments in simulated S-shaped canals.
Bonaccorso A; Cantatore G; Condorelli GG; Schäfer E; Tripi TR
J Endod; 2009 Jun; 35(6):883-6. PubMed ID: 19482191
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Preparation of the coronal and middle third of oval root canals with a rotary or an oscillating system.
Rüttermann S; Virtej A; Janda R; Raab WH
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2007 Dec; 104(6):852-6. PubMed ID: 17706438
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Influence of the NiTi rotary system on the debridement quality of the root canal space.
De-Deus G; Garcia-Filho P
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2009 Oct; 108(4):e71-6. PubMed ID: 19778736
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Scanning electron microscopic evaluation of debris and smear layer remaining following use of ProTaper and Hero Shaper instruments in combination with NaOCl and EDTA irrigation.
Yang G; Wu H; Zheng Y; Zhang H; Li H; Zhou X
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 Oct; 106(4):e63-71. PubMed ID: 18701325
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Comparison of root canal preparation with two rotary NiTi instruments: ProFile .04 and GT Rotary.
Rödig T; Hülsmann M; Kahlmeier C
Int Endod J; 2007 Jul; 40(7):553-62. PubMed ID: 17511784
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Smear layer production of K3 and ProFile Ni-Ti rotary instruments in curved root canals: a comparative SEM study.
Kum KY; Kazemi RB; Cha BY; Zhu Q
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Apr; 101(4):536-41. PubMed ID: 16545720
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Instrument separation analysis of multi-used ProTaper Universal rotary system during root canal therapy.
Wu J; Lei G; Yan M; Yu Y; Yu J; Zhang G
J Endod; 2011 Jun; 37(6):758-63. PubMed ID: 21787484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Effect of three nickel-titanium rotary file techniques on infected root dentin reduction.
Chuste-Guillot MP; Badet C; Peli JF; Perez F
Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2006 Aug; 102(2):254-8. PubMed ID: 16876071
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Study of the progressive changes in canal shape after using different instruments by hand in simulated S-shaped canals.
Ding-ming H; Hong-xia L; Cheung GS; Lan Z; Hong T; Xue-dong Z
J Endod; 2007 Aug; 33(8):986-9. PubMed ID: 17878089
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Comparative evaluation of three nickel-titanium instrumentation systems in human teeth using computed tomography.
Ozgur Uyanik M; Cehreli ZC; Ozgen Mocan B; Tasman Dagli F
J Endod; 2006 Jul; 32(7):668-71. PubMed ID: 16793477
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. A comparison of curved canal instrumentation using nickel-titanium or stainless steel files with the balanced-force technique.
Harlan AL; Nicholls JI; Steiner JC
J Endod; 1996 Aug; 22(8):410-3. PubMed ID: 8941749
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Shaping ability and cleaning effectiveness of Mtwo versus coated and uncoated EasyShape instruments in severely curved root canals of extracted teeth.
Bürklein S; Hiller C; Huda M; Schäfer E
Int Endod J; 2011 May; 44(5):447-57. PubMed ID: 21276014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
