These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

114 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21862530)

  • 1. Paper-and-pencil and web-based testing: the measurement invariance of the Big Five personality tests in applied settings.
    Vecchione M; Alessandri G; Barbaranelli C
    Assessment; 2012 Jun; 19(2):243-6. PubMed ID: 21862530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Internet administration of paper-and-pencil questionnaires used in couple research: assessing psychometric equivalence.
    Brock RL; Barry RA; Lawrence E; Dey J; Rolffs J
    Assessment; 2012 Jun; 19(2):226-42. PubMed ID: 20881103
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. IRT-related factor analytic procedures for testing the equivalence of paper-and-pencil and Internet-administered questionnaires.
    Ferrando PJ; Lorenzo-Seva U
    Psychol Methods; 2005 Jun; 10(2):193-205. PubMed ID: 15998177
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A test of the factor structure equivalence of the 50-item IPIP Five-factor model measure across gender and ethnic groups.
    Ehrhart KH; Roesch SC; Ehrhart MG; Kilian B
    J Pers Assess; 2008 Sep; 90(5):507-16. PubMed ID: 18704810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparative validity of brief to medium-length Big Five and Big Six Personality Questionnaires.
    Thalmayer AG; Saucier G; Eigenhuis A
    Psychol Assess; 2011 Dec; 23(4):995-1009. PubMed ID: 21859221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Examining the impact of gender on the factor structure of the Psychopathic Personality Inventory-Revised.
    Anestis JC; Caron KM; Carbonell JL
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):340-9. PubMed ID: 21490056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the five factors of personality in adolescents: the junior version of the Spanish NEO-PI-R.
    Ortet G; Ibáñez MI; Moya J; Villa H; Viruela A; Mezquita L
    Assessment; 2012 Mar; 19(1):114-30. PubMed ID: 21622482
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Assessing obsessive compulsive symptoms and cognitions on the internet: evidence for the comparability of paper and Internet administration.
    Coles ME; Cook LM; Blake TR
    Behav Res Ther; 2007 Sep; 45(9):2232-40. PubMed ID: 17306222
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A comparison of validity rates between paper-and-pencil and computerized testing with the MMPI-2.
    Blazek NL; Forbey JD
    Assessment; 2011 Mar; 18(1):63-6. PubMed ID: 20829402
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A new look at the big five factor structure through exploratory structural equation modeling.
    Marsh HW; Lüdtke O; Muthén B; Asparouhov T; Morin AJ; Trautwein U; Nagengast B
    Psychol Assess; 2010 Sep; 22(3):471-91. PubMed ID: 20822261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Examination of the equivalence of self-report survey-based paper-and-pencil and internet data collection methods.
    Weigold A; Weigold IK; Russell EJ
    Psychol Methods; 2013 Mar; 18(1):53-70. PubMed ID: 23477606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Non-association between Neo-5 personality tests and multiple mini-interview.
    Kulasegaram K; Reiter HI; Wiesner W; Hackett RD; Norman GR
    Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract; 2010 Aug; 15(3):415-23. PubMed ID: 20013153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Internal consistency and measurement equivalence of the cannabis screening questions on the paper-and-pencil face-to-face ASSIST versus the online instrument.
    Khazaal Y; Chatton A; Monney G; Nallet A; Khan R; Zullino D; Etter JF
    Subst Abuse Treat Prev Policy; 2015 Mar; 10():8. PubMed ID: 25886462
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement invariance of personality traits from a five-factor model perspective: multi-group confirmatory factor analyses of the HP5 inventory.
    Gustavsson JP; Eriksson AK; Hilding A; Gunnarsson M; Ostensson CG
    Scand J Psychol; 2008 Oct; 49(5):459-67. PubMed ID: 18452498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The big seven model of personality and its relevance to personality pathology.
    Simms LJ
    J Pers; 2007 Feb; 75(1):65-94. PubMed ID: 17214592
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Comparison of paper-and-pencil versus Web administration of the Youth Risk Behavior Survey (YRBS): risk behavior prevalence estimates.
    Eaton DK; Brener ND; Kann L; Denniston MM; McManus T; Kyle TM; Roberts AM; Flint KH; Ross JG
    Eval Rev; 2010 Apr; 34(2):137-53. PubMed ID: 20234000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Web-based assessment of depression in patients treated in clinical practice: reliability, validity, and patient acceptance.
    Zimmerman M; Martinez JH
    J Clin Psychiatry; 2012 Mar; 73(3):333-8. PubMed ID: 22154899
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Psychometric properties of the five facet mindfulness questionnaire in depressed adults and development of a short form.
    Bohlmeijer E; ten Klooster PM; Fledderus M; Veehof M; Baer R
    Assessment; 2011 Sep; 18(3):308-20. PubMed ID: 21586480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Psychometric properties of the Center for Epidemiologic Studies Depression Scale (CES-D) in French clinical and nonclinical adults.
    Morin AJ; Moullec G; Maïano C; Layet L; Just JL; Ninot G
    Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2011 Oct; 59(5):327-40. PubMed ID: 21925817
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Item placement on a personality measure: effects on faking behavior and test measurement properties.
    McFarland LA; Ryan AM; Ellis A
    J Pers Assess; 2002 Apr; 78(2):348-69. PubMed ID: 12067198
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.