These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

113 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21862530)

  • 21. Mind your words: positive and negative items create method effects on the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire.
    Van Dam NT; Hobkirk AL; Danoff-Burg S; Earleywine M
    Assessment; 2012 Jun; 19(2):198-204. PubMed ID: 22389242
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Reliability and validity of the Japanese version of the Recovery Assessment Scale (RAS) for people with chronic mental illness: scale development.
    Chiba R; Miyamoto Y; Kawakami N
    Int J Nurs Stud; 2010 Mar; 47(3):314-22. PubMed ID: 19679304
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The mini-IPIP scales: tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five factors of personality.
    Donnellan MB; Oswald FL; Baird BM; Lucas RE
    Psychol Assess; 2006 Jun; 18(2):192-203. PubMed ID: 16768595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Using the Internet for psychological research: personality testing on the World Wide Web.
    Buchanan T; Smith JL
    Br J Psychol; 1999 Feb; 90 ( Pt 1)():125-44. PubMed ID: 10085550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Measurement invariance of the Schizotypal Personality Questionnaire-Brief across gender and age.
    Fonseca-Pedrero E; Paino M; Lemos-Giráldez S; Sierra-Baigrie S; Muñiz J
    Psychiatry Res; 2011 Dec; 190(2-3):309-15. PubMed ID: 21663975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Validation of the insomnia severity index as a web-based measure.
    Thorndike FP; Ritterband LM; Saylor DK; Magee JC; Gonder-Frederick LA; Morin CM
    Behav Sleep Med; 2011; 9(4):216-23. PubMed ID: 22003975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Psychometric properties of the Belgian coach version of the coach-athlete relationship questionnaire (CART-Q).
    Balduck AL; Jowett S
    Scand J Med Sci Sports; 2010 Oct; 20(5):779-86. PubMed ID: 19804577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Does assessment type matter? A measurement invariance analysis of online and paper and pencil assessment of the Community Assessment of Psychic Experiences (CAPE).
    Vleeschouwer M; Schubart CD; Henquet C; Myin-Germeys I; van Gastel WA; Hillegers MH; van Os JJ; Boks MP; Derks EM
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(1):e84011. PubMed ID: 24465389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Personality characteristics and trait clusters in final stage astronaut selection.
    Musson DM; Sandal GM; Helmreich RL
    Aviat Space Environ Med; 2004 Apr; 75(4):342-9. PubMed ID: 15086124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Personality measurement, faking, and employment selection.
    Hogan J; Barrett P; Hogan R
    J Appl Psychol; 2007 Sep; 92(5):1270-85. PubMed ID: 17845085
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Towards understanding assessments of the big five: multitrait-multimethod analyses of convergent and discriminant validity across measurement occasion and type of observer.
    Biesanz JC; West SG
    J Pers; 2004 Aug; 72(4):845-76. PubMed ID: 15210019
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Socially Desirable Responding in Web-Based Questionnaires: A Meta-Analytic Review of the Candor Hypothesis.
    Gnambs T; Kaspar K
    Assessment; 2017 Sep; 24(6):746-762. PubMed ID: 26739360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Survey of substance use among high school students in Taipei: web-based questionnaire versus paper-and-pencil questionnaire.
    Wang YC; Lee CM; Lew-Ting CY; Hsiao CK; Chen DR; Chen WJ
    J Adolesc Health; 2005 Oct; 37(4):289-95. PubMed ID: 16182139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Relationship between circadian typology and big five personality domains.
    Tonetti L; Fabbri M; Natale V
    Chronobiol Int; 2009 Feb; 26(2):337-47. PubMed ID: 19212845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Higher-order factors of the Big Five in a multi-informant sample.
    DeYoung CG
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2006 Dec; 91(6):1138-51. PubMed ID: 17144770
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. The nature and structure of correlations among Big Five ratings: the halo-alpha-beta model.
    Anusic I; Schimmack U; Pinkus RT; Lockwood P
    J Pers Soc Psychol; 2009 Dec; 97(6):1142-56. PubMed ID: 19968424
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. An investigation into differences between the structure of temperament and the structure of personality.
    Trofimova I
    Am J Psychol; 2010; 123(4):467-80. PubMed ID: 21291163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Factorial composition of the Aggression Questionnaire: a multi-sample study in Greek adults.
    Vitoratou S; Ntzoufras I; Smyrnis N; Stefanis NC
    Psychiatry Res; 2009 Jun; 168(1):32-9. PubMed ID: 19443044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Factor Structure and Administration Measurement Invariance of the Beliefs Toward Mental Illness Scale in Latino College Samples: Paper-Pencil Versus Internet Administrations.
    Hirai M; Vernon LL; Clum GA
    Assessment; 2018 Sep; 25(6):759-768. PubMed ID: 27469500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Psychometric and structural analysis of the MMPI-2 Personality Psychopathology Five (PSY-5) facet subscales.
    Quilty LC; Bagby RM
    Assessment; 2007 Dec; 14(4):375-84. PubMed ID: 17986655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.