These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

201 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21863864)

  • 1. DSX: a knowledge-based scoring function for the assessment of protein-ligand complexes.
    Neudert G; Klebe G
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2731-45. PubMed ID: 21863864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DrugScore(CSD)-knowledge-based scoring function derived from small molecule crystal data with superior recognition rate of near-native ligand poses and better affinity prediction.
    Velec HF; Gohlke H; Klebe G
    J Med Chem; 2005 Oct; 48(20):6296-303. PubMed ID: 16190756
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. A knowledge-based energy function for protein-ligand, protein-protein, and protein-DNA complexes.
    Zhang C; Liu S; Zhu Q; Zhou Y
    J Med Chem; 2005 Apr; 48(7):2325-35. PubMed ID: 15801826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. General and targeted statistical potentials for protein-ligand interactions.
    Mooij WT; Verdonk ML
    Proteins; 2005 Nov; 61(2):272-87. PubMed ID: 16106379
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Knowledge-based scoring function to predict protein-ligand interactions.
    Gohlke H; Hendlich M; Klebe G
    J Mol Biol; 2000 Jan; 295(2):337-56. PubMed ID: 10623530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A general and fast scoring function for protein-ligand interactions: a simplified potential approach.
    Muegge I; Martin YC
    J Med Chem; 1999 Mar; 42(5):791-804. PubMed ID: 10072678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing scoring functions for protein-ligand interactions.
    Ferrara P; Gohlke H; Price DJ; Klebe G; Brooks CL
    J Med Chem; 2004 Jun; 47(12):3032-47. PubMed ID: 15163185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. FURSMASA: a new approach to rapid scoring functions that uses a MD-averaged potential energy grid and a solvent-accessible surface area term with parameters GA fit to experimental data.
    Pearlman DA; Rao BG; Charifson P
    Proteins; 2008 May; 71(3):1519-38. PubMed ID: 18300249
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparative assessment of scoring functions on a diverse test set.
    Cheng T; Li X; Li Y; Liu Z; Wang R
    J Chem Inf Model; 2009 Apr; 49(4):1079-93. PubMed ID: 19358517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Combination of scoring functions improves discrimination in protein-protein docking.
    Murphy J; Gatchell DW; Prasad JC; Vajda S
    Proteins; 2003 Dec; 53(4):840-54. PubMed ID: 14635126
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparative evaluation of 11 scoring functions for molecular docking.
    Wang R; Lu Y; Wang S
    J Med Chem; 2003 Jun; 46(12):2287-303. PubMed ID: 12773034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Role of binding entropy in the refinement of protein-ligand docking predictions: analysis based on the use of 11 scoring functions.
    Ruvinsky AM
    J Comput Chem; 2007 Jun; 28(8):1364-72. PubMed ID: 17342720
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. FDS: flexible ligand and receptor docking with a continuum solvent model and soft-core energy function.
    Taylor RD; Jewsbury PJ; Essex JW
    J Comput Chem; 2003 Oct; 24(13):1637-56. PubMed ID: 12926007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Knowledge-based scoring functions in drug design: 2. Can the knowledge base be enriched?
    Shen Q; Xiong B; Zheng M; Luo X; Luo C; Liu X; Du Y; Li J; Zhu W; Shen J; Jiang H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Feb; 51(2):386-97. PubMed ID: 21192670
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Prediction of protein-ligand binding affinities using multiple instance learning.
    Teramoto R; Kashima H
    J Mol Graph Model; 2010 Nov; 29(3):492-7. PubMed ID: 20965757
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A new test set for validating predictions of protein-ligand interaction.
    Nissink JW; Murray C; Hartshorn M; Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Taylor R
    Proteins; 2002 Dec; 49(4):457-71. PubMed ID: 12402356
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Supervised consensus scoring for docking and virtual screening.
    Teramoto R; Fukunishi H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2007; 47(2):526-34. PubMed ID: 17295466
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. The consequences of scoring docked ligand conformations using free energy correlations.
    Spyrakis F; Amadasi A; Fornabaio M; Abraham DJ; Mozzarelli A; Kellogg GE; Cozzini P
    Eur J Med Chem; 2007 Jul; 42(7):921-33. PubMed ID: 17346861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Converging a Knowledge-Based Scoring Function: DrugScore
    Dittrich J; Schmidt D; Pfleger C; Gohlke H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2019 Jan; 59(1):509-521. PubMed ID: 30513206
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. SuperStar: improved knowledge-based interaction fields for protein binding sites.
    Verdonk ML; Cole JC; Watson P; Gillet V; Willett P
    J Mol Biol; 2001 Mar; 307(3):841-59. PubMed ID: 11273705
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.