166 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21864024)
1. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without formal collecting system closure: perioperative outcomes in 104 consecutive patients.
Bylund JR; Clark CJ; Crispen PL; Lagrange CA; Strup SE
J Endourol; 2011 Dec; 25(12):1853-7. PubMed ID: 21864024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Impact of collecting-system repair during laparoscopic partial nephrectomy.
Zorn KC; Gong EM; Orvieto MA; Gofrit ON; Mikhail AA; Shalhav AL
J Endourol; 2007 Mar; 21(3):315-20. PubMed ID: 17444778
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Hand-assisted laparoscopic versus robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison of short-term outcomes and cost.
Elsamra SE; Leone AR; Lasser MS; Thavaseelan S; Golijanin D; Haleblian GE; Pareek G
J Endourol; 2013 Feb; 27(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 22891728
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Radiofrequency ablation-assisted robotic laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without renal hilar vessel clamping versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: a comparison of perioperative outcomes.
Wu SD; Viprakasit DP; Cashy J; Smith ND; Perry KT; Nadler RB
J Endourol; 2010 Mar; 24(3):385-91. PubMed ID: 20334556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Simplifying laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: technical considerations for reproducible outcomes.
Orvieto MA; Chien GW; Tolhurst SR; Rapp DE; Steinberg GD; Mikhail AA; Brendler CB; Shalhav AL
Urology; 2005 Nov; 66(5):976-80. PubMed ID: 16286106
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of Hand-Assisted Laparoscopic vs Robot-Assisted Laparoscopic vs Open Partial Nephrectomy in Patients with T1 Renal Masses.
Han KS; Song GH; You D; Song C; Jeong IG; Hong JH; Ahn H; Kim CS; Hong B
J Endourol; 2017 Apr; 31(4):374-379. PubMed ID: 25353326
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar vascular clamping using a saline-cooled, high-density monopolar radiofrequency device.
Tan YH; Young MD; L'Esperance JO; Preminger GM; Albala DM
J Endourol; 2004 Nov; 18(9):883-7. PubMed ID: 15659926
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. External validation of a model for tailoring the operative approach to minimally invasive partial nephrectomy.
Vricella GJ; Murray S; Boncher NA; Madi R
BJU Int; 2011 Jun; 107(11):1806-10. PubMed ID: 21040363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Radiofrequency coagulation-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy without hilar clamping: a feasible technique with excellent outcomes in highly selected patients.
Patel HD; Pierorazio PM; Mullins JK; Hyams ES; Allaf ME
J Endourol; 2012 Jan; 26(1):58-62. PubMed ID: 21999399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Off-clamp versus complete hilar control laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: comparison by clinical stage.
Rais-Bahrami S; George AK; Herati AS; Srinivasan AK; Richstone L; Kavoussi LR
BJU Int; 2012 May; 109(9):1376-81. PubMed ID: 21992566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy using FloSeal for hemostasis: technique and experiences in 102 patients.
Wille AH; Johannsen M; Miller K; Deger S
Surg Innov; 2009 Dec; 16(4):306-12. PubMed ID: 20031942
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Knotless closure of the collecting system and renal parenchyma with a novel barbed suture during laparoscopic porcine partial nephrectomy.
Shikanov S; Wille M; Large M; Lifshitz DA; Zorn KC; Shalhav AL; Eggener SE
J Endourol; 2009 Jul; 23(7):1157-60. PubMed ID: 19530906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Robot assisted partial nephrectomy versus laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for renal tumors: a multi-institutional analysis of perioperative outcomes.
Benway BM; Bhayani SB; Rogers CG; Dulabon LM; Patel MN; Lipkin M; Wang AJ; Stifelman MD
J Urol; 2009 Sep; 182(3):866-72. PubMed ID: 19616229
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Tailoring technique of laparoscopic partial nephrectomy to tumor characteristics.
Weizer AZ; Gilbert SM; Roberts WW; Hollenbeck BK; Wolf JS
J Urol; 2008 Oct; 180(4):1273-8. PubMed ID: 18707711
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Identifying unrecognized collecting system entry and the integrity of repair during open partial nephrectomy: comparison of two techniques.
Rao SR; Moussly S; Pacheco M; Spiess PE; Sexton WJ
Int Braz J Urol; 2014; 40(5):637-43. PubMed ID: 25498274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Laparoscopic partial nephrectomy for selected central tumours: omitting the bolster.
Weight CJ; Lane BR; Gill IS
BJU Int; 2007 Aug; 100(2):375-8. PubMed ID: 17617142
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Hand-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy after 60 cases: comparison with open partial nephrectomy.
DeVoe WB; Kercher KW; Hope WW; Lincourt AE; Norton HJ; Teigland CM
Surg Endosc; 2009 May; 23(5):1075-80. PubMed ID: 18830753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Robot-assisted laparoscopic partial nephrectomy: the NYU technique.
Phillips CK; Taneja SS; Stifelman MD
J Endourol; 2005 May; 19(4):441-5; discussion 445. PubMed ID: 15910252
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Controlled survival study of the effects of Tisseel or a combination of FloSeal and Tisseel on major vascular injury and major collecting-system injury during partial nephrectomy in a porcine model.
L'Esperance JO; Sung JC; Marguet CG; Maloney ME; Springhart WP; Preminger GM; Albala DM
J Endourol; 2005 Nov; 19(9):1114-21. PubMed ID: 16283850
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Robotic versus standard laparoscopic partial/wedge nephrectomy: a comparison of intraoperative and perioperative results from a single institution.
Deane LA; Lee HJ; Box GN; Melamud O; Yee DS; Abraham JB; Finley DS; Borin JF; McDougall EM; Clayman RV; Ornstein DK
J Endourol; 2008 May; 22(5):947-52. PubMed ID: 18397157
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
