These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

630 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 2186425)

  • 1. Dimensional overlap: cognitive basis for stimulus-response compatibility--a model and taxonomy.
    Kornblum S; Hasbroucq T; Osman A
    Psychol Rev; 1990 Apr; 97(2):253-70. PubMed ID: 2186425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dissociation of S-R compatibility and Simon effects with mixed tasks and mappings.
    Proctor RW; Yamaguchi M; Dutt V; Gonzalez C
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2013 Apr; 39(2):593-609. PubMed ID: 22963231
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Stimulus-response compatibility effects in go-no-go tasks: a dimensional overlap account.
    Shiu LP; Kornblum S
    Percept Psychophys; 1999 Nov; 61(8):1613-23. PubMed ID: 10598474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Response compatibility and the relationship between event-related potentials and the timing of a motor response.
    Goodin DS; Aminoff MJ; Chequer RS; Ortiz TA
    J Neurophysiol; 1996 Dec; 76(6):3705-13. PubMed ID: 8985868
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Coactivation in the perception of redundant targets.
    Fournier LR; Eriksen CW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):538-50. PubMed ID: 2144569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Stimulus-response compatibility and psychological refractory period effects: implications for response selection.
    Lien MC; Proctor RW
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2002 Jun; 9(2):212-38. PubMed ID: 12120784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional overlap accounts for independence and integration of stimulus-response compatibility effects.
    Liu X; Park Y; Gu X; Fan J
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2010 Aug; 72(6):1710-20. PubMed ID: 20675812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. An action sequence held in memory can interfere with response selection of a target stimulus, but does not interfere with response activation of noise stimuli.
    Mattson PS; Fournier LR
    Mem Cognit; 2008 Oct; 36(7):1236-47. PubMed ID: 18927040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A parallel distributed processing model of stimulus-stimulus and stimulus-response compatibility.
    Zhang HH; Zhang J; Kornblum S
    Cogn Psychol; 1999 May; 38(3):386-432. PubMed ID: 10328858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of two Simon tasks: neuronal correlates of conflict resolution based on coherent motion perception.
    Wittfoth M; Buck D; Fahle M; Herrmann M
    Neuroimage; 2006 Aug; 32(2):921-9. PubMed ID: 16677831
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. SLAM: a connectionist model for attention in visual selection tasks.
    Phaf RH; Van der Heijden AH; Hudson PT
    Cogn Psychol; 1990 Jul; 22(3):273-341. PubMed ID: 2376113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Eyetracking and selective attention in category learning.
    Rehder B; Hoffman AB
    Cogn Psychol; 2005 Aug; 51(1):1-41. PubMed ID: 16039934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Stimulus-response compatibility with body parts: a study with hands.
    Lameira AP; Pereira A; Fraga-Filho RS; Gawryszewski LG
    Exp Brain Res; 2015 Jul; 233(7):2127-32. PubMed ID: 25893910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The neural effect of stimulus-response modality compatibility on dual-task performance: an fMRI study.
    Stelzel C; Schumacher EH; Schubert T; D'Esposito M
    Psychol Res; 2006 Nov; 70(6):514-25. PubMed ID: 16175414
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. More rapid visual identification rate in search of a missing stimulus.
    Inamori Y; Inamori R
    Percept Mot Skills; 1990 Apr; 70(2):570. PubMed ID: 2342858
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Stimulus-response compatibility with relevant and irrelevant stimulus dimensions that do and do not overlap with the response.
    Kornblum S; Lee JW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1995 Aug; 21(4):855-75. PubMed ID: 7643052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Processing of an irrelevant location dimension as a function of the relevant stimulus dimension.
    Lu CH; Proctor RW
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1994 Apr; 20(2):286-98. PubMed ID: 8189193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. N2pc is modulated by stimulus-stimulus, but not by stimulus-response incompatibilities.
    Cespón J; Galdo-Álvarez S; Díaz F
    Biol Psychol; 2013 Apr; 93(1):75-80. PubMed ID: 23380335
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Integrating information from separable psychological dimensions.
    Ashby FG; Maddox WT
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1990 Aug; 16(3):598-612. PubMed ID: 2144574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Backward crosstalk and the role of dimensional overlap within and between tasks.
    Huestegge L; Pieczykolan A; Janczyk M
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2018 Jul; 188():139-147. PubMed ID: 29933176
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 32.