These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
159 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21864455)
21. Central perceptual load does not reduce ipsilesional flanker interference in parietal extinction. Snow JC; Mattingley JB Neuropsychology; 2008 May; 22(3):371-82. PubMed ID: 18444715 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Learning by selection: visual search and object perception in young infants. Amso D; Johnson SP Dev Psychol; 2006 Nov; 42(6):1236-45. PubMed ID: 17087555 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A spatial frequency account of the detriment that local processing of Navon letters has on face recognition. Hills PJ; Lewis MB J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2009 Oct; 35(5):1427-42. PubMed ID: 19803647 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. N250r and N400 ERP correlates of immediate famous face repetition are independent of perceptual load. Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR Brain Res; 2008 Nov; 1239():181-90. PubMed ID: 18793621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Voluntary and involuntary attention have different consequences: the effect of perceptual difficulty. Prinzmetal W; Zvinyatskovskiy A; Gutierrez P; Dilem L Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2009 Feb; 62(2):352-69. PubMed ID: 18609402 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. N250r ERP repetition effects from distractor faces when attending to another face under load: Evidence for a face attention resource. Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR Brain Res; 2009 May; 1270():64-77. PubMed ID: 19306855 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. A candidate for the attentional bottleneck: set-size specific modulation of the right TPJ during attentive enumeration. Vetter P; Butterworth B; Bahrami B J Cogn Neurosci; 2011 Mar; 23(3):728-36. PubMed ID: 20350059 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Bilateral attentional advantage on elementary visual tasks. Reardon KM; Kelly JG; Matthews N Vision Res; 2009 Mar; 49(7):691-701. PubMed ID: 19200437 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Effects of prismatic adaptation on spatial gradients in unilateral neglect: A comparison of visual and auditory target detection with central attentional load. Eramudugolla R; Boyce A; Irvine DR; Mattingley JB Neuropsychologia; 2010 Jul; 48(9):2681-92. PubMed ID: 20478321 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Perceptual load manipulation reveals sensitivity of the face-selective N170 to attention. Mohamed TN; Neumann MF; Schweinberger SR Neuroreport; 2009 May; 20(8):782-7. PubMed ID: 19369907 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Differentiating spatial and object-based effects on attention: an event-related brain potential study with peripheral cueing. He X; Humphreys G; Fan S; Chen L; Han S Brain Res; 2008 Dec; 1245():116-25. PubMed ID: 18955038 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. The role of the magnocellular and parvocellular pathways in the attentional blink. Nieuwenhuis S; Jepma M; La Fors S; Olivers CN Brain Cogn; 2008 Oct; 68(1):42-8. PubMed ID: 18359543 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Attentional capacity limit for visual search causes spatial neglect in normal observers. Morgan MJ; Solomon JA Vision Res; 2006 Jun; 46(12):1868-75. PubMed ID: 16430942 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Imaging the attentional blink: perceptual versus attentional limitations. Johnston SJ; Shapiro KL; Vogels W; Roberts NJ Neuroreport; 2007 Sep; 18(14):1475-8. PubMed ID: 17712277 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Adaptation to number operates on perceived rather than physical numerosity. Fornaciai M; Cicchini GM; Burr DC Cognition; 2016 Jun; 151():63-67. PubMed ID: 26986745 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]