213 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21864566)
1. On causation in therapeutic research: observational studies, randomised experiments and instrumental variable analysis.
Dekkers OM
Prev Med; 2011 Oct; 53(4-5):239-41. PubMed ID: 21864566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On the causal structure of information bias and confounding bias in randomized trials.
Shahar E; Shahar DJ
J Eval Clin Pract; 2009 Dec; 15(6):1214-6. PubMed ID: 20367730
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. An introduction to instrumental variables--part 2: Mendelian randomisation.
Bennett DA
Neuroepidemiology; 2010; 35(4):307-10. PubMed ID: 21042034
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Confounding in health research.
Greenland S; Morgenstern H
Annu Rev Public Health; 2001; 22():189-212. PubMed ID: 11274518
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Bounds on potential risks and causal risk differences under assumptions about confounding parameters.
Chiba Y; Sato T; Greenland S
Stat Med; 2007 Dec; 26(28):5125-35. PubMed ID: 17525935
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Apples and oranges? Interpretations of risk adjustment and instrumental variable estimates of intended treatment effects using observational data.
Fang G; Brooks JM; Chrischilles EA
Am J Epidemiol; 2012 Jan; 175(1):60-5. PubMed ID: 22085626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Mendelian randomization as an instrumental variable approach to causal inference.
Didelez V; Sheehan N
Stat Methods Med Res; 2007 Aug; 16(4):309-30. PubMed ID: 17715159
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Should meta-analyses of interventions include observational studies in addition to randomized controlled trials? A critical examination of underlying principles.
Shrier I; Boivin JF; Steele RJ; Platt RW; Furlan A; Kakuma R; Brophy J; Rossignol M
Am J Epidemiol; 2007 Nov; 166(10):1203-9. PubMed ID: 17712019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Methods to adjust for bias and confounding in critical care health services research involving observational data.
Wunsch H; Linde-Zwirble WT; Angus DC
J Crit Care; 2006 Mar; 21(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 16616616
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating causal parameters without target populations.
Shahar E
J Eval Clin Pract; 2007 Oct; 13(5):814-6. PubMed ID: 17824877
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Characteristics of good causation studies.
Daya S
Semin Reprod Med; 2003 Feb; 21(1):73-83. PubMed ID: 12806562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Making valid causal inferences from observational data.
Martin W
Prev Vet Med; 2014 Feb; 113(3):281-97. PubMed ID: 24113257
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Doubly robust estimators of causal exposure effects with missing data in the outcome, exposure or a confounder.
Williamson EJ; Forbes A; Wolfe R
Stat Med; 2012 Dec; 31(30):4382-400. PubMed ID: 23086504
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Two-stage instrumental variable methods for estimating the causal odds ratio: analysis of bias.
Cai B; Small DS; Have TR
Stat Med; 2011 Jul; 30(15):1809-24. PubMed ID: 21495062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Addressing the issue of channeling bias in observational studies with propensity scores analysis.
Lobo FS; Wagner S; Gross CR; Schommer JC
Res Social Adm Pharm; 2006 Mar; 2(1):143-51. PubMed ID: 17138506
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Bias analysis of the instrumental variable estimator as an estimator of the average causal effect.
Chiba Y
Contemp Clin Trials; 2010 Jan; 31(1):12-7. PubMed ID: 19879376
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. An introduction to instrumental variables analysis: part 1.
Bennett DA
Neuroepidemiology; 2010; 35(3):237-40. PubMed ID: 20861655
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. What random assignment does and does not do.
Krause MS; Howard KI
J Clin Psychol; 2003 Jul; 59(7):751-66. PubMed ID: 12808582
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Methods to assess intended effects of drug treatment in observational studies are reviewed.
Klungel OH; Martens EP; Psaty BM; Grobbee DE; Sullivan SD; Stricker BH; Leufkens HG; de Boer A
J Clin Epidemiol; 2004 Dec; 57(12):1223-31. PubMed ID: 15617947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Mendelian randomisation: a tool for assessing causality in observational epidemiology.
Sheehan NA; Meng S; Didelez V
Methods Mol Biol; 2011; 713():153-66. PubMed ID: 21153618
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
