These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

97 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21864769)

  • 1. Pragmatic reconstruction methods in atom probe tomography.
    Vurpillot F; Gruber M; Da Costa G; Martin I; Renaud L; Bostel A
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 Jul; 111(8):1286-94. PubMed ID: 21864769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Atom probe trajectory mapping using experimental tip shape measurements.
    Haley D; Petersen T; Ringer SP; Smith GD
    J Microsc; 2011 Nov; 244(2):170-80. PubMed ID: 22004277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improvements in planar feature reconstructions in atom probe tomography.
    Larson DJ; Geiser BP; Prosa TJ; Gerstl SS; Reinhard DA; Kelly TF
    J Microsc; 2011 Jul; 243(1):15-30. PubMed ID: 21155994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Analysis of motion tracking in echocardiographic image sequences: influence of system geometry and point-spread function.
    Touil B; Basarab A; Delachartre P; Bernard O; Friboulet D
    Ultrasonics; 2010 Mar; 50(3):373-86. PubMed ID: 19837445
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On the use of simulated field-evaporated specimen apex shapes in atom probe tomography data reconstruction.
    Larson DJ; Geiser BP; Prosa TJ; Kelly TF
    Microsc Microanal; 2012 Oct; 18(5):953-63. PubMed ID: 23058657
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Characteristics of cross-sectional atom probe analysis on semiconductor structures.
    Koelling S; Innocenti N; Hellings G; Gilbert M; Kambham AK; De Meyer K; Vandervorst W
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):540-5. PubMed ID: 21292399
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Calibration of reconstruction parameters in atom probe tomography using a single crystallographic orientation.
    Suram SK; Rajan K
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():136-42. PubMed ID: 23507030
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. A model to predict image formation in Atom probe Tomography.
    Vurpillot F; Gaillard A; Da Costa G; Deconihout B
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():152-7. PubMed ID: 23398963
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impact of laser pulsing on the reconstruction in an atom probe tomography.
    Gault B; La Fontaine A; Moody MP; Ringer SP; Marquis EA
    Ultramicroscopy; 2010 Aug; 110(9):1215-22. PubMed ID: 20471173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. New Atom Probe Tomography Reconstruction Algorithm for Multilayered Samples: Beyond the Hemispherical Constraint.
    Rolland N; Vurpillot F; Duguay S; Mazumder B; Speck JS; Blavette D
    Microsc Microanal; 2017 Apr; 23(2):247-254. PubMed ID: 28327210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Analysis of Three-dimensional Atom-probe Data by the Proximity Histogram.
    Hellman OC; Vandenbroucke JA; Rüsing J; Isheim D; Seidman DN
    Microsc Microanal; 2000 Sep; 6(5):437-444. PubMed ID: 11003678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Full tip imaging in atom probe tomography.
    Du S; Burgess T; Loi ST; Gault B; Gao Q; Bao P; Li L; Cui X; Kong Yeoh W; Tan HH; Jagadish C; Ringer SP; Zheng R
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Jan; 124():96-101. PubMed ID: 23142750
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Three-dimensional atom probe tomography of oxide, anion, and alkanethiolate coatings on gold.
    Zhang Y; Hillier AC
    Anal Chem; 2010 Jul; 82(14):6139-47. PubMed ID: 20575560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Advances in the reconstruction of atom probe tomography data.
    Gault B; Haley D; de Geuser F; Moody MP; Marquis EA; Larson DJ; Geiser BP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):448-57. PubMed ID: 21146931
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Preparation of nanowire specimens for laser-assisted atom probe tomography.
    Blumtritt H; Isheim D; Senz S; Seidman DN; Moutanabbir O
    Nanotechnology; 2014 Oct; 25(43):435704. PubMed ID: 25299058
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effect of analysis direction on the measurement of interfacial mixing in thin metal layers with atom probe tomography.
    Larson DJ; Prosa TJ; Geiser BP; Egelhoff WF
    Ultramicroscopy; 2011 May; 111(6):506-11. PubMed ID: 21215522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Electrostatic simulations of a local electrode atom probe: the dependence of tomographic reconstruction parameters on specimen and microscope geometry.
    Loi ST; Gault B; Ringer SP; Larson DJ; Geiser BP
    Ultramicroscopy; 2013 Sep; 132():107-13. PubMed ID: 23294557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Tomographic Atom Probe: New Dimension in Materials Analysis.
    Deconihout B; Pareige C; Pareige P; Blavette D; Menand A
    Microsc Microanal; 1999 Jan; 5(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 10227825
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Introducing a Crystallography-Mediated Reconstruction (CMR) Approach to Atom Probe Tomography.
    Day AC; Ceguerra AV; Ringer SP
    Microsc Microanal; 2019 Apr; 25(2):288-300. PubMed ID: 30712521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Level set methods for modelling field evaporation in atom probe.
    Haley D; Moody MP; Smith GD
    Microsc Microanal; 2013 Dec; 19(6):1709-17. PubMed ID: 23985174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.