These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21864878)
21. Comparison between a moving bed membrane bioreactor and a conventional membrane bioreactor on organic carbon and nitrogen removal. Yang S; Yang F; Fu Z; Lei R Bioresour Technol; 2009 Apr; 100(8):2369-74. PubMed ID: 19111458 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. An integrated MBR-TiO2 photocatalysis process for the removal of Carbamazepine from simulated pharmaceutical industrial effluent. Laera G; Chong MN; Jin B; Lopez A Bioresour Technol; 2011 Jul; 102(13):7012-5. PubMed ID: 21558053 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Serial mixed-mode cation- and anion-exchange solid-phase extraction for separation of basic, neutral and acidic pharmaceuticals in wastewater and analysis by high-performance liquid chromatography-quadrupole time-of-flight mass spectrometry. Lavén M; Alsberg T; Yu Y; Adolfsson-Erici M; Sun H J Chromatogr A; 2009 Jan; 1216(1):49-62. PubMed ID: 19054521 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Removal and fate of emerging contaminants combining biological, flocculation and membrane treatments. Melo-Guimarães A; Torner-Morales FJ; Durán-Álvarez JC; Jiménez-Cisneros BE Water Sci Technol; 2013; 67(4):877-85. PubMed ID: 23306268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Effect of low dosages of powdered activated carbon on membrane bioreactor performance. Remy M; Temmink H; Rulkens W Water Sci Technol; 2012; 65(5):954-61. PubMed ID: 22339033 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Removal of pharmaceuticals from wastewater by biological processes, hydrodynamic cavitation and UV treatment. Zupanc M; Kosjek T; Petkovšek M; Dular M; Kompare B; Širok B; Blažeka Ž; Heath E Ultrason Sonochem; 2013 Jul; 20(4):1104-12. PubMed ID: 23352585 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Comparison of two treatments for the removal of selected organic micropollutants and bulk organic matter: conventional activated sludge followed by ultrafiltration versus membrane bioreactor. Sahar E; Ernst M; Godehardt M; Hein A; Herr J; Kazner C; Melin T; Cikurel H; Aharoni A; Messalem R; Brenner A; Jekel M Water Sci Technol; 2011; 63(4):733-40. PubMed ID: 21330721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Removal of cosmetic ingredients and pharmaceuticals in sewage primary treatment. Carballa M; Omil F; Lema JM Water Res; 2005 Nov; 39(19):4790-6. PubMed ID: 16246396 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Comparison of the behaviour of selected micropollutants in a membrane bioreactor and a conventional wastewater treatment plant. Clara M; Strenn B; Ausserleitner M; Kreuzinger N Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):29-36. PubMed ID: 15497826 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Effect of PAC addition on sludge properties in an MBR treating high strength wastewater. Satyawali Y; Balakrishnan M Water Res; 2009 Apr; 43(6):1577-88. PubMed ID: 19201006 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Study of a large scale powdered activated carbon pilot: Removals of a wide range of emerging and priority micropollutants from wastewater treatment plant effluents. Mailler R; Gasperi J; Coquet Y; Deshayes S; Zedek S; Cren-Olivé C; Cartiser N; Eudes V; Bressy A; Caupos E; Moilleron R; Chebbo G; Rocher V Water Res; 2015 Apr; 72():315-30. PubMed ID: 25466636 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Comparison of sludge characteristics and performance of a submerged membrane bioreactor and an activated sludge process at high solids retention time. Massé A; Spérandio M; Cabassud C Water Res; 2006 Jul; 40(12):2405-15. PubMed ID: 16759682 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Landfill leachate treatment using powdered activated carbon augmented sequencing batch reactor (SBR) process: optimization by response surface methodology. Aziz SQ; Aziz HA; Yusoff MS; Bashir MJ J Hazard Mater; 2011 May; 189(1-2):404-13. PubMed ID: 21420786 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Nitrogen fixation in the activated sludge treatment of thermomechanical pulping wastewater: effect of dissolved oxygen. Slade AH; Anderson SM; Evans BG Water Sci Technol; 2003; 48(8):1-8. PubMed ID: 14682564 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Upflow anaerobic sludge blanket reactor--a review. Bal AS; Dhagat NN Indian J Environ Health; 2001 Apr; 43(2):1-82. PubMed ID: 12397675 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Fate of pharmaceutical and personal care products (PPCPs) during anaerobic digestion of sewage sludge. Carballa M; Omil F; Ternes T; Lema JM Water Res; 2007 May; 41(10):2139-50. PubMed ID: 17399761 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Development of an innovative vertical submerged membrane bioreactor (VSMBR) for simultaneous removal of organic matter and nutrients. Chae SR; Kang ST; Watanabe Y; Shin HS Water Res; 2006 Jun; 40(11):2161-7. PubMed ID: 16720035 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of linear alkylbenzene sulfonates removal in conventional activated sludge systems and membrane bioreactors. De Wever H; Van Roy S; Dotremont C; Miller J; Knepper T Water Sci Technol; 2004; 50(5):219-25. PubMed ID: 15497851 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Removal and fate of micropollutants in a sponge-based moving bed bioreactor. Luo Y; Guo W; Ngo HH; Nghiem LD; Hai FI; Kang J; Xia S; Zhang Z; Price WE Bioresour Technol; 2014 May; 159():311-9. PubMed ID: 24658104 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]