These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

126 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21865625)

  • 1. Verdicts on radiofrequency electromagnetic fields from IARC and ICNIRP. Verifying Canadian nuclear energy worker radiation risk: a reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear energy workers (1957-1994). Childhood cancer in the vicinity of nuclear power plants: results of the CANUPIS study. Environment Agencies' statement on Radioactive Waste Advisers and associated guidance. BBC Trust-BBC science coverage given 'vote of confidence' by independent report.
    J Radiol Prot; 2011 Sep; 31(3):373-6. PubMed ID: 21865625
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Incomplete data on the Canadian cohort may have affected the results of the study by the International Agency for Research on Cancer on the radiogenic cancer risk among nuclear industry workers in 15 countries.
    Ashmore JP; Gentner NE; Osborne RV
    J Radiol Prot; 2010 Jun; 30(2):121-9. PubMed ID: 20530869
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. [Radiation exposure and cancer mortality among nuclear power plant workers: a meta-analysis].
    Park ES; Moon K; Kim HN; Lee WJ; Jin YW
    J Prev Med Public Health; 2010 Mar; 43(2):185-92. PubMed ID: 20383052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Childhood cancer in relation to distance from high-voltage power lines in England and Wales: a case-control study.
    Swanson J
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):336-7. PubMed ID: 16312037
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Childhood cancer and power lines: results do not support causal role for electromagnetic fields.
    Hepworth SJ; Feltbower RG; Parslow RC; McKinney PA
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):634-5; discussion 636; author reply 636-7. PubMed ID: 16166138
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. A reanalysis of cancer mortality in Canadian nuclear workers (1956-1994) based on revised exposure and cohort data.
    Zablotska LB; Lane RS; Thompson PA
    Br J Cancer; 2014 Jan; 110(1):214-23. PubMed ID: 24231946
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Electromagnetic fields and health effects--epidemiologic studies of cancer, diseases of the central nervous system and arrhythmia-related heart disease.
    Johansen C
    Scand J Work Environ Health; 2004; 30 Suppl 1():1-30. PubMed ID: 15255560
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Electric and magnetic fields at power frequencies.
    Miller AB; Green LM
    Chronic Dis Can; 2010; 29 Suppl 1():69-83. PubMed ID: 21199600
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. [Risk of childhood leukemia and environmental exposure to ELF electromagnetic fields].
    Magnani C
    G Ital Med Lav Ergon; 2003; 25(3):373-5. PubMed ID: 14582266
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Childhood cancer mortality in relation to the St Lucie nuclear power station.
    Boice JD; Mumma MT; Blot WJ; Heath CW
    J Radiol Prot; 2005 Sep; 25(3):229-40. PubMed ID: 16286687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Cancer mortality among French nuclear contract workers.
    Guérin S; Richard G; Biau A; Lebre S; Crescini D; Haddy N; Guldner L; Paoletti C; Hill C; de Vathaire F
    Am J Ind Med; 2009 Dec; 52(12):916-25. PubMed ID: 19937949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Childhood cancer and power lines: What do the data mean?
    Day N; Eden T; McKinney P; Roman E; Simpson J
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):634; discussion 636; author reply 636-7. PubMed ID: 16166139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Childhood cancers near German nuclear power stations: hypothesis to explain the cancer increases.
    Fairlie I
    Med Confl Surviv; 2009; 25(3):206-20. PubMed ID: 19813417
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Carcinogenic risk of extremely-low-frequency electromagnetic fields: state of the art].
    Pira E; Zanetti C; Saia B
    Med Lav; 1994; 85(6):447-62. PubMed ID: 7731404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Childhood cancer incidence in proximity to nuclear power plants in Illinois.
    Ma F; Lehnherr M; Fornoff J; Shen T
    Arch Environ Occup Health; 2011; 66(2):87-94. PubMed ID: 24484365
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Biological effects from electromagnetic field exposure and public exposure standards.
    Hardell L; Sage C
    Biomed Pharmacother; 2008 Feb; 62(2):104-9. PubMed ID: 18242044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Guest editors' introduction: is EMF a potential environmental risk for children?
    Repacholi M; Saunders R; van Deventer E; Kheifets L
    Bioelectromagnetics; 2005; Suppl 7():S2-4. PubMed ID: 16217739
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. [Ionizing radiation, magnetic fields and cancer in children].
    Lindgren E; Pershagen G
    Lakartidningen; 1992 Dec; 89(50):4343-4. PubMed ID: 1469962
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evidence of children's vulnerability to radiation in the context of radiological/nuclear events and considerations for emergency response.
    Lane R; Reinhardt P; Thompson P
    Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2010 Nov; 142(1):36-9. PubMed ID: 20959331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Childhood cancer and power lines: study had important omissions.
    Coghill RW
    BMJ; 2005 Sep; 331(7517):635; discussion 636; author reply 636-7. PubMed ID: 16166140
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.