These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
6. Effects of pore-size and shape distributions on diffusion pore imaging by nuclear magnetic resonance. Kuder TA; Laun FB Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2015 Aug; 92(2):022706. PubMed ID: 26382431 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Nuclear magnetic resonance relaxation and diffusion in the presence of internal gradients: the effect of magnetic field strength. Mitchell J; Chandrasekera TC; Johns ML; Gladden LF; Fordham EJ Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys; 2010 Feb; 81(2 Pt 2):026101. PubMed ID: 20365625 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Experimental determination of pore shapes using phase retrieval from q-space NMR diffraction. Demberg K; Laun FB; Bertleff M; Bachert P; Kuder TA Phys Rev E; 2018 May; 97(5-1):052412. PubMed ID: 29906842 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Restricted diffusion and exchange of water in porous media: average structure determination and size distribution resolved from the effect of local field gradients on the proton NMR spectrum. Kuntz JF; Palmas P; Level V; Canet D J Magn Reson; 2008 Apr; 191(2):239-47. PubMed ID: 18222101 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Magnetic resonance imaging by synergistic diffusion-diffraction patterns. Shemesh N; Westin CF; Cohen Y Phys Rev Lett; 2012 Feb; 108(5):058103. PubMed ID: 22400966 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Recent Fourier and Laplace perspectives for multidimensional NMR in porous media. Callaghan PT; Arns CH; Galvosas P; Hunter MW; Qiao Y; Washburn KE Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(4):441-4. PubMed ID: 17466759 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The heterogeneous distribution of the liquid phase in partially filled porous glasses and its effect on self-diffusion. Farrher G; Ardelean I; Kimmich R Magn Reson Imaging; 2007 May; 25(4):453-6. PubMed ID: 17466762 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Stimulated echo double diffusion encoded imaging of closed pores: Influence and removal of unbalanced terms. Demberg K; Laun FB; Bachert P; Ladd ME; Kuder TA Phys Rev E; 2019 Oct; 100(4-1):042408. PubMed ID: 31770958 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The effect of impermeable boundaries of arbitrary geometry on the apparent diffusion coefficient. Frøhlich AF; Jespersen SN; Ostergaard L; Kiselev VG J Magn Reson; 2008 Sep; 194(1):128-35. PubMed ID: 18619878 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Empirical time dependence of liquid self-diffusion coefficient in porous media. Loskutov VV J Magn Reson; 2012 Mar; 216():192-6. PubMed ID: 22357367 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Observation of molecular migration in porous media using 2D exchange spectroscopy in the inhomogeneous magnetic field. Burcaw LM; Callaghan PT J Magn Reson; 2009 Jun; 198(2):167-73. PubMed ID: 19303335 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Investigation of different boundary treatment methods in Monte-Carlo simulations of diffusion NMR. Xing H; Lin F; Wu Q; Gong Q Magn Reson Med; 2013 Oct; 70(4):1167-72. PubMed ID: 23169149 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. T1-diffusion-ordered spectroscopy: nuclear magnetic resonance mixture analysis using parallel factor analysis. Nilsson M; Botana A; Morris GA Anal Chem; 2009 Oct; 81(19):8119-25. PubMed ID: 19715300 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]