These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

238 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21867519)

  • 1. Including non-additive genetic effects in Bayesian methods for the prediction of genetic values based on genome-wide markers.
    Wittenburg D; Melzer N; Reinsch N
    BMC Genet; 2011 Aug; 12():74. PubMed ID: 21867519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Dominance and epistatic genetic variances for litter size in pigs using genomic models.
    Vitezica ZG; Reverter A; Herring W; Legarra A
    Genet Sel Evol; 2018 Dec; 50(1):71. PubMed ID: 30577727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Genomic prediction using an iterative conditional expectation algorithm for a fast BayesC-like model.
    Dong L; Wang Z
    Genetica; 2018 Oct; 146(4-5):361-368. PubMed ID: 29948517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Application of a Bayesian dominance model improves power in quantitative trait genome-wide association analysis.
    Bennewitz J; Edel C; Fries R; Meuwissen TH; Wellmann R
    Genet Sel Evol; 2017 Jan; 49(1):7. PubMed ID: 28088170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A non-parametric mixture model for genome-enabled prediction of genetic value for a quantitative trait.
    Gianola D; Wu XL; Manfredi E; Simianer H
    Genetica; 2010 Oct; 138(9-10):959-77. PubMed ID: 20737196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Bayesian neural networks with variable selection for prediction of genotypic values.
    van Bergen GHH; Duenk P; Albers CA; Bijma P; Calus MPL; Wientjes YCJ; Kappen HJ
    Genet Sel Evol; 2020 May; 52(1):26. PubMed ID: 32414320
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Non-additive genetic variation in growth, carcass and fertility traits of beef cattle.
    Bolormaa S; Pryce JE; Zhang Y; Reverter A; Barendse W; Hayes BJ; Goddard ME
    Genet Sel Evol; 2015 Apr; 47(1):26. PubMed ID: 25880217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Bayesian reversible-jump for epistasis analysis in genomic studies.
    Balestre M; de Souza CL
    BMC Genomics; 2016 Dec; 17(1):1012. PubMed ID: 27938339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Estimating additive and non-additive genetic variances and predicting genetic merits using genome-wide dense single nucleotide polymorphism markers.
    Su G; Christensen OF; Ostersen T; Henryon M; Lund MS
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(9):e45293. PubMed ID: 23028912
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Efficient Markov chain Monte Carlo implementation of Bayesian analysis of additive and dominance genetic variances in noninbred pedigrees.
    Waldmann P; Hallander J; Hoti F; Sillanpää MJ
    Genetics; 2008 Jun; 179(2):1101-12. PubMed ID: 18558655
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating Nonadditive Genomic Relationship Matrices into the Study of Genetic Architecture of Complex Traits.
    Nazarian A; Gezan SA
    J Hered; 2016 Mar; 107(2):153-62. PubMed ID: 26712858
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Predictive ability of genome-assisted statistical models under various forms of gene action.
    Momen M; Mehrgardi AA; Sheikhi A; Kranis A; Tusell L; Morota G; Rosa GJM; Gianola D
    Sci Rep; 2018 Aug; 8(1):12309. PubMed ID: 30120288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Genome-wide prediction using Bayesian additive regression trees.
    Waldmann P
    Genet Sel Evol; 2016 Jun; 48(1):42. PubMed ID: 27286957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genomic Model with Correlation Between Additive and Dominance Effects.
    Xiang T; Christensen OF; Vitezica ZG; Legarra A
    Genetics; 2018 Jul; 209(3):711-723. PubMed ID: 29743175
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Identifying quantitative trait locus by genetic background interactions in association studies.
    Jannink JL
    Genetics; 2007 May; 176(1):553-61. PubMed ID: 17179077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Epistatic analysis of carcass characteristics in pigs reveals genomic interactions between quantitative trait loci attributable to additive and dominance genetic effects.
    Duthie C; Simm G; Doeschl-Wilson A; Kalm E; Knap PW; Roehe R
    J Anim Sci; 2010 Jul; 88(7):2219-34. PubMed ID: 20228239
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Genomic breeding value prediction and QTL mapping of QTLMAS2011 data using Bayesian and GBLUP methods.
    Zeng J; Pszczola M; Wolc A; Strabel T; Fernando RL; Garrick DJ; Dekkers JC
    BMC Proc; 2012 May; 6 Suppl 2(Suppl 2):S7. PubMed ID: 22640755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. A new mapping method for quantitative trait loci of silkworm.
    Xu HM; Wei CS; Tang YT; Zhu ZH; Sima YF; Lou XY
    BMC Genet; 2011 Jan; 12():19. PubMed ID: 21276233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Use of a Bayesian model including QTL markers increases prediction reliability when test animals are distant from the reference population.
    Ma P; Lund MS; Aamand GP; Su G
    J Dairy Sci; 2019 Aug; 102(8):7237-7247. PubMed ID: 31155255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Marker-assisted prediction of non-additive genetic values.
    Long N; Gianola D; Rosa GJ; Weigel KA
    Genetica; 2011 Jul; 139(7):843-54. PubMed ID: 21674154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 12.