BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

91 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21868300)

  • 1. Analysis of a claimed distant relationship in a deficient pedigree using high density SNP data.
    Lareu MV; García-Magariños M; Phillips C; Quintela I; Carracedo A; Salas A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 21868300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects.
    Kling D; Welander J; Tillmar A; Skare O; Egeland T; Holmlund G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21813350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
    Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SNPs as Supplements in Simple Kinship Analysis or as Core Markers in Distant Pairwise Relationship Tests: When Do SNPs Add Value or Replace Well-Established and Powerful STR Tests?
    Phillips C; García-Magariños M; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Transfus Med Hemother; 2012 Jun; 39(3):202-210. PubMed ID: 22851936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of distant family relationships.
    Skare Ø; Sheehan N; Egeland T
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 25(18):2376-82. PubMed ID: 19584067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A SNaPshot assay for genotyping 44 individual identification single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Lou C; Cong B; Li S; Fu L; Zhang X; Feng T; Su S; Ma C; Yu F; Ye J; Pei L
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Feb; 32(3-4):368-78. PubMed ID: 21298663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tri-allelic SNP markers enable analysis of mixed and degraded DNA samples.
    Westen AA; Matai AS; Laros JF; Meiland HC; Jasper M; de Leeuw WJ; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 19647708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference.
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):300-21. PubMed ID: 16388833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hot topic: performance of bovine high-density genotyping platforms in Holsteins and Jerseys.
    Rincon G; Weber KL; Eenennaam AL; Golden BL; Medrano JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6116-21. PubMed ID: 22118099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A DNA microarray system for forensic SNP analysis.
    Divne AM; Allen M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(2-3):111-21. PubMed ID: 16182957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinship assignment with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit: Sources of error in simulated and real cases.
    Pilli E; Tarallo R; Riccia P; Berti A; Novelletto A
    Sci Justice; 2022 Jan; 62(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 35033321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Genplex SNP typing system and a 49plex forensic marker panel.
    Phillips C; Fang R; Ballard D; Fondevila M; Harrison C; Hyland F; Musgrave-Brown E; Proff C; Ramos-Luis E; Sobrino B; Carracedo A; Furtado MR; Syndercombe Court D; Schneider PM;
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 19083752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
    Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
    Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The usefulness of SNP markers for analyses of highly degraded biological materials].
    Babol-Pokora K; Prośniak A; Jacewicz R; Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 20073261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How many SNPs are enough?
    Smouse PE
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1265-6. PubMed ID: 20456228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a 21-locus autosomal SNP multiplex for forensic identification purposes.
    Dixon LA; Murray CM; Archer EJ; Dobbins AE; Koumi P; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 16182950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of novel SNP markers for kinship analysis in the Korean population.
    Youn BJ; Cho WC; Yoo S; Lee K; Kim CH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jan; 342():111541. PubMed ID: 36565683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and parentage analysis in Eucalyptus grandis breeding populations.
    Kirst M; Cordeiro CM; Rezende GD; Grattapaglia D
    J Hered; 2005; 96(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 15601907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.