These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

88 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21868300)

  • 1. Analysis of a claimed distant relationship in a deficient pedigree using high density SNP data.
    Lareu MV; García-Magariños M; Phillips C; Quintela I; Carracedo A; Salas A
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):350-3. PubMed ID: 21868300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. DNA microarray as a tool in establishing genetic relatedness--Current status and future prospects.
    Kling D; Welander J; Tillmar A; Skare O; Egeland T; Holmlund G
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2012 May; 6(3):322-9. PubMed ID: 21813350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Resolving relationship tests that show ambiguous STR results using autosomal SNPs as supplementary markers.
    Phillips C; Fondevila M; García-Magariños M; Rodriguez A; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2008 Jun; 2(3):198-204. PubMed ID: 19083821
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. SNPs as Supplements in Simple Kinship Analysis or as Core Markers in Distant Pairwise Relationship Tests: When Do SNPs Add Value or Replace Well-Established and Powerful STR Tests?
    Phillips C; García-Magariños M; Salas A; Carracedo A; Lareu MV
    Transfus Med Hemother; 2012 Jun; 39(3):202-210. PubMed ID: 22851936
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Exploring the efficacy of paternity and kinship testing based on single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Mo SK; Liu YC; Wang SQ; Bo XC; Li Z; Chen Y; Ni M
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2016 May; 22():161-168. PubMed ID: 26952733
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Identification of distant family relationships.
    Skare Ø; Sheehan N; Egeland T
    Bioinformatics; 2009 Sep; 25(18):2376-82. PubMed ID: 19584067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A SNaPshot assay for genotyping 44 individual identification single nucleotide polymorphisms.
    Lou C; Cong B; Li S; Fu L; Zhang X; Feng T; Su S; Ma C; Yu F; Ye J; Pei L
    Electrophoresis; 2011 Feb; 32(3-4):368-78. PubMed ID: 21298663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tri-allelic SNP markers enable analysis of mixed and degraded DNA samples.
    Westen AA; Matai AS; Laros JF; Meiland HC; Jasper M; de Leeuw WJ; de Knijff P; Sijen T
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2009 Sep; 3(4):233-41. PubMed ID: 19647708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Informativeness of genetic markers for pairwise relationship and relatedness inference.
    Wang J
    Theor Popul Biol; 2006 Nov; 70(3):300-21. PubMed ID: 16388833
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Hot topic: performance of bovine high-density genotyping platforms in Holsteins and Jerseys.
    Rincon G; Weber KL; Eenennaam AL; Golden BL; Medrano JF
    J Dairy Sci; 2011 Dec; 94(12):6116-21. PubMed ID: 22118099
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A DNA microarray system for forensic SNP analysis.
    Divne AM; Allen M
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(2-3):111-21. PubMed ID: 16182957
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Kinship assignment with the ForenSeq™ DNA Signature Prep Kit: Sources of error in simulated and real cases.
    Pilli E; Tarallo R; Riccia P; Berti A; Novelletto A
    Sci Justice; 2022 Jan; 62(1):1-9. PubMed ID: 35033321
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of the Genplex SNP typing system and a 49plex forensic marker panel.
    Phillips C; Fang R; Ballard D; Fondevila M; Harrison C; Hyland F; Musgrave-Brown E; Proff C; Ramos-Luis E; Sobrino B; Carracedo A; Furtado MR; Syndercombe Court D; Schneider PM;
    Forensic Sci Int Genet; 2007 Jun; 1(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 19083752
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Genotype probabilities of pairs of individuals for X-chromosome markers.
    Toni C; Domenici R; Presciuttini S
    Transfusion; 2007 Jul; 47(7):1276-80. PubMed ID: 17581164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [The usefulness of SNP markers for analyses of highly degraded biological materials].
    Babol-Pokora K; Prośniak A; Jacewicz R; Berent J
    Arch Med Sadowej Kryminol; 2009; 59(2):118-23. PubMed ID: 20073261
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. How many SNPs are enough?
    Smouse PE
    Mol Ecol; 2010 Apr; 19(7):1265-6. PubMed ID: 20456228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Validation of a 21-locus autosomal SNP multiplex for forensic identification purposes.
    Dixon LA; Murray CM; Archer EJ; Dobbins AE; Koumi P; Gill P
    Forensic Sci Int; 2005 Nov; 154(1):62-77. PubMed ID: 16182950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Imputation of missing single nucleotide polymorphism genotypes using a multivariate mixed model framework.
    Calus MP; Veerkamp RF; Mulder HA
    J Anim Sci; 2011 Jul; 89(7):2042-9. PubMed ID: 21357451
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Identification of novel SNP markers for kinship analysis in the Korean population.
    Youn BJ; Cho WC; Yoo S; Lee K; Kim CH
    Forensic Sci Int; 2023 Jan; 342():111541. PubMed ID: 36565683
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Power of microsatellite markers for fingerprinting and parentage analysis in Eucalyptus grandis breeding populations.
    Kirst M; Cordeiro CM; Rezende GD; Grattapaglia D
    J Hered; 2005; 96(2):161-6. PubMed ID: 15601907
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.