329 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21868419)
1. Survey on surgical instrument handle design: ergonomics and acceptance.
Santos-Carreras L; Hagen M; Gassert R; Bleuler H
Surg Innov; 2012 Mar; 19(1):50-9. PubMed ID: 21868419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Initial experience using a robotic-driven laparoscopic needle holder with ergonomic handle: assessment of surgeons' task performance and ergonomics.
Sánchez-Margallo JA; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Int J Comput Assist Radiol Surg; 2017 Dec; 12(12):2069-2077. PubMed ID: 28695479
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Robotic approaches to the posterior spine.
Ponnusamy K; Chewning S; Mohr C
Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2009 Sep; 34(19):2104-9. PubMed ID: 19730218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Ergonomics of and technologies for single-port lapaxroscopic surgery.
Tang B; Hou S; Cuschieri SA
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2012 Jan; 21(1):46-54. PubMed ID: 22066862
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Kinematics of a robotic 3UPS1S spherical wrist designed for laparoscopic applications.
Navarro JS; Garcia N; Perez C; Fernandez E; Saltaren R; Almonacid M
Int J Med Robot; 2010 Sep; 6(3):291-300. PubMed ID: 20812269
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Assessment of Postural Ergonomics and Surgical Performance in Laparoendoscopic Single-Site Surgery Using a Handheld Robotic Device.
Sánchez-Margallo FM; Sánchez-Margallo JA
Surg Innov; 2018 Jun; 25(3):208-217. PubMed ID: 29482483
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Influence of handle design on the surgeon's upper limb movements, muscle recruitment, and fatigue during endoscopic suturing.
Emam TA; Frank TG; Hanna GB; Cuschieri A
Surg Endosc; 2001 Jul; 15(7):667-72. PubMed ID: 11591965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. An ergonomic study of the optimum operating table height for laparoscopic surgery.
Berquer R; Smith WD; Davis S
Surg Endosc; 2002 Mar; 16(3):416-21. PubMed ID: 11928019
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Design and evaluation of a new ergonomic handle for instruments in minimally invasive surgery.
Sancibrian R; Gutierrez-Diez MC; Torre-Ferrero C; Benito-Gonzalez MA; Redondo-Figuero C; Manuel-Palazuelos JC
J Surg Res; 2014 May; 188(1):88-99. PubMed ID: 24439133
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Ergonomics problems due to the use and design of dissector and needle holder: a survey in minimally invasive surgery.
Lucas-Hernández M; Pagador JB; Pérez-Duarte FJ; Castelló P; Sánchez-Margallo FM
Surg Laparosc Endosc Percutan Tech; 2014 Oct; 24(5):e170-7. PubMed ID: 24710253
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Hand-held robotic instrument for dextrous laparoscopic interventions.
Piccigallo M; Focacci F; Tonet O; Megali G; Quaglia C; Dario P
Int J Med Robot; 2008 Dec; 4(4):331-8. PubMed ID: 18803339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improved usability of a new handle design for laparoscopic dissection forceps.
Veelen MA; Meijer DW; Goossens RH; Snijders CJ; Jakimowicz JJ
Surg Endosc; 2002 Jan; 16(1):201-7. PubMed ID: 11961640
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Comparison of postural ergonomics between laparoscopic and robotic sacrocolpopexy: a pilot study.
Tarr ME; Brancato SJ; Cunkelman JA; Polcari A; Nutter B; Kenton K
J Minim Invasive Gynecol; 2015 Feb; 22(2):234-8. PubMed ID: 25315401
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Robotic hysterectomy versus conventional laparoscopic hysterectomy: outcome and cost analyses of a matched case-control study.
Sarlos D; Kots L; Stevanovic N; Schaer G
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2010 May; 150(1):92-6. PubMed ID: 20207063
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The Minimally Invasive Manipulator: an ergonomic and economic non-robotic alternative for endoscopy?
Bosma J; Aarts S; Jaspers J
Minim Invasive Ther Allied Technol; 2015 Feb; 24(1):24-30. PubMed ID: 25627434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Paediatric robotic surgery in clinical practice: a cost analysis.
Anderberg M; Kockum CC; Arnbjornsson E
Eur J Pediatr Surg; 2009 Oct; 19(5):311-5. PubMed ID: 19830631
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Robot-assisted laparoscopic colposacropexy and cervicosacropexy with the da Vinci® surgical system.
Matthews CA
Surg Technol Int; 2010 Oct; 20():232-7. PubMed ID: 21082572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Wireless virtual instrument measurement of surgeons' physical and mental workloads for robotic versus manual minimally invasive surgery.
Smith WD; Berguer R; Rosser JC
Stud Health Technol Inform; 2003; 94():318-24. PubMed ID: 15455916
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Robotic surgery, telerobotic surgery, telepresence, and telementoring. Review of early clinical results.
Ballantyne GH
Surg Endosc; 2002 Oct; 16(10):1389-402. PubMed ID: 12140630
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Ergonomics, user comfort, and performance in standard and robot-assisted laparoscopic surgery.
van der Schatte Olivier RH; Van't Hullenaar CD; Ruurda JP; Broeders IA
Surg Endosc; 2009 Jun; 23(6):1365-71. PubMed ID: 18855053
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
