196 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21868607)
1. Cost of adaptation and fitness effects of beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens.
Bataillon T; Zhang T; Kassen R
Genetics; 2011 Nov; 189(3):939-49. PubMed ID: 21868607
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Mutations of intermediate effect are responsible for adaptation in evolving Pseudomonas fluorescens populations.
Barrett RD; MacLean RC; Bell G
Biol Lett; 2006 Jun; 2(2):236-8. PubMed ID: 17148371
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria.
Kassen R; Bataillon T
Nat Genet; 2006 Apr; 38(4):484-8. PubMed ID: 16550173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The distribution of fitness effects of new beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens.
McDonald MJ; Cooper TF; Beaumont HJ; Rainey PB
Biol Lett; 2011 Feb; 7(1):98-100. PubMed ID: 20659918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Evolution of Fitness Trade-Offs in Locally Adapted Populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens.
Schick A; Bailey SF; Kassen R
Am Nat; 2015 Oct; 186 Suppl 1():S48-59. PubMed ID: 26656216
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. The evolution of a pleiotropic fitness tradeoff in Pseudomonas fluorescens.
MacLean RC; Bell G; Rainey PB
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A; 2004 May; 101(21):8072-7. PubMed ID: 15150419
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The fitness effect of mutations across environments: Fisher's geometrical model with multiple optima.
Martin G; Lenormand T
Evolution; 2015 Jun; 69(6):1433-1447. PubMed ID: 25908434
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Specific adaptation to strong competitors can offset the negative effects of population size reductions.
Zhao XF; Buckling A; Zhang QG; Hesse E
Proc Biol Sci; 2018 Mar; 285(1875):. PubMed ID: 29593112
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Adaptive landscapes in evolving populations of Pseudomonas fluorescens.
Melnyk AH; Kassen R
Evolution; 2011 Nov; 65(11):3048-59. PubMed ID: 22023573
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Fitness variation across subtle environmental perturbations reveals local modularity and global pleiotropy of adaptation.
Kinsler G; Geiler-Samerotte K; Petrov DA
Elife; 2020 Dec; 9():. PubMed ID: 33263280
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Experimental evolution of bet hedging.
Beaumont HJ; Gallie J; Kost C; Ferguson GC; Rainey PB
Nature; 2009 Nov; 462(7269):90-3. PubMed ID: 19890329
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The environment affects epistatic interactions to alter the topology of an empirical fitness landscape.
Flynn KM; Cooper TF; Moore FB; Cooper VS
PLoS Genet; 2013 Apr; 9(4):e1003426. PubMed ID: 23593024
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Linking temperature dependence of fitness effects of mutations to thermal niche adaptation.
Chen N; Zhang QG
J Evol Biol; 2023 Oct; 36(10):1517-1524. PubMed ID: 37750539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Diminishing returns from beneficial mutations and pervasive epistasis shape the fitness landscape for rifampicin resistance in Pseudomonas aeruginosa.
MacLean RC; Perron GG; Gardner A
Genetics; 2010 Dec; 186(4):1345-54. PubMed ID: 20876562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Multiple adaptive substitutions during evolution in novel environments.
Jain K; Seetharaman S
Genetics; 2011 Nov; 189(3):1029-43. PubMed ID: 21900275
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Three biofilm types produced by a model pseudomonad are differentiated by structural characteristics and fitness advantage.
Koza A; Jerdan R; Cameron S; Spiers AJ
Microbiology (Reading); 2020 Aug; 166(8):707-716. PubMed ID: 32520698
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Adaptation limits diversification of experimental bacterial populations.
Buckling A; Wills MA; Colegrave N
Science; 2003 Dec; 302(5653):2107-9. PubMed ID: 14684817
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adaptive radiation of Pseudomonas fluorescens SBW25 in experimental microcosms provides an understanding of the evolutionary ecology and molecular biology of A-L interface biofilm formation.
Koza A; Kusmierska A; McLaughlin K; Moshynets O; Spiers AJ
FEMS Microbiol Lett; 2017 Jul; 364(12):. PubMed ID: 28535292
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Effects of new mutations on fitness: insights from models and data.
Bataillon T; Bailey SF
Ann N Y Acad Sci; 2014 Jul; 1320(1):76-92. PubMed ID: 24891070
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Rapid decline of adaptation of
Gómez P; Hall AR; Paterson S; Buckling A
Biol Lett; 2022 Mar; 18(3):20210593. PubMed ID: 35259940
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
