These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
629 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21869770)
1. Survival analysis of composite Dahl restorations provided to manage localised anterior tooth wear (ten year follow-up). Gulamali AB; Hemmings KW; Tredwin CJ; Petrie A Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):E9. PubMed ID: 21869770 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition: a 7-year follow-up of a prospective randomised controlled split-mouth clinical trial. Al-Khayatt AS; Ray-Chaudhuri A; Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Porter RW; Kelleher MG; Eliyas S J Oral Rehabil; 2013 May; 40(5):389-401. PubMed ID: 23496025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The survival and clinical performance of resin-based composite restorations used to treat localised anterior tooth wear. Redman CD; Hemmings KW; Good JA Br Dent J; 2003 May; 194(10):566-72; discussion 559. PubMed ID: 12819732 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Computer-aided designed/computer-assisted manufactured composite resin versus ceramic single-tooth restorations: a 3-year clinical study. Vanoorbeek S; Vandamme K; Lijnen I; Naert I Int J Prosthodont; 2010; 23(3):223-30. PubMed ID: 20552087 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Three-year evaluation of posterior vertical bite reconstruction using direct resin composite--a case series. Schmidlin PR; Filli T; Imfeld C; Tepper S; Attin T Oper Dent; 2009; 34(1):102-8. PubMed ID: 19192844 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Comparison of pattern of failure of resin composite restorations in non-carious cervical lesions with and without occlusal wear facets. Oginni AO; Adeleke AA J Dent; 2014 Jul; 42(7):824-30. PubMed ID: 24746714 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Three-year randomized clinical trial to evaluate the clinical performance and wear of a nanocomposite versus a hybrid composite. Palaniappan S; Bharadwaj D; Mattar DL; Peumans M; Van Meerbeek B; Lambrechts P Dent Mater; 2009 Nov; 25(11):1302-14. PubMed ID: 19577288 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Durability of resin composite restorations in high C-factor cavities: a 12-year follow-up. van Dijken JW J Dent; 2010 Jun; 38(6):469-74. PubMed ID: 20193727 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A retrospective clinical study of cervical restorations: longevity and failure-prognostic variables. Namgung C; Rho YJ; Jin BH; Lim BS; Cho BH Oper Dent; 2013; 38(4):376-85. PubMed ID: 23215544 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. The survival and clinical performance of anterior composite resin restorations and posterior indirect and cast restorations used to treat generalised tooth wear. Shah S; Hemmings K; Gulamali A; Petrie A; Malik JS Br Dent J; 2024 Aug; 237(3):203-211. PubMed ID: 39123028 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Retrospective Study of the Survival and Patient Satisfaction with Composite Dahl Restorations in the Management of Localised Anterior Tooth Wear. Aljawad A; Rees JS Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2016 Dec; 24(4):222-229. PubMed ID: 28510377 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The management of anterior tooth wear using gold palatal veneers in canine guidance. Eliyas S; Martin N Br Dent J; 2013 Mar; 214(6):291-7. PubMed ID: 23518974 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Recontouring teeth and closing diastemas with direct composite buildups: a 5-year follow-up. Frese C; Schiller P; Staehle HJ; Wolff D J Dent; 2013 Nov; 41(11):979-85. PubMed ID: 23954577 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Four-year clinical evaluation of two self-etching dentin adhesives of different pH values used to restore non-retentive cervical lesions. Söderholm KJ; Ottenga M; Nimmo S Am J Dent; 2013 Feb; 26(1):28-32. PubMed ID: 23724546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The evaluation of direct composite restorations for the worn mandibular anterior dentition - clinical performance and patient satisfaction. Poyser NJ; Briggs PF; Chana HS; Kelleher MG; Porter RW; Patel MM J Oral Rehabil; 2007 May; 34(5):361-76. PubMed ID: 17441877 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. The survival of direct composite restorations in the management of severe tooth wear including attrition and erosion: A prospective 8-year study. Milosevic A; Burnside G J Dent; 2016 Jan; 44():13-9. PubMed ID: 26542166 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Nanohybrid composite vs. fine hybrid composite in extended class II cavities: clinical and microscopic results after 2 years. Krämer N; Reinelt C; García-Godoy F; Taschner M; Petschelt A; Frankenberger R Am J Dent; 2009 Aug; 22(4):228-34. PubMed ID: 19824560 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Two-year clinical performance of Clearfil SE and Clearfil S3 in restoration of unabraded non-carious class V lesions. Brackett MG; Dib A; Franco G; Estrada BE; Brackett WW Oper Dent; 2010; 35(3):273-8. PubMed ID: 20533626 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]