These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

137 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21869791)

  • 1. The impact of digital image processing artefacts mimicking pathological features associated with restorations.
    Brettle D; Carmichael F
    Br Dent J; 2011 Aug; 211(4):167-70. PubMed ID: 21869791
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Visibility of artificial buccal recurrent caries under restorations using different radiographic techniques.
    Murat S; Kamburoğlu K; Isayev A; Kurşun S; Yüksel S
    Oper Dent; 2013; 38(2):197-207. PubMed ID: 22917443
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Can adaptive post-processing of storage phosphor plate panoramic radiographs provide better image quality? A comparison of anatomical image quality of panoramic radiographs before and after adaptive processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Jul; 77(5):328-333. PubMed ID: 30623704
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Guide to Digital Radiographic Imaging.
    Mol A; Yoon DC
    J Calif Dent Assoc; 2015 Sep; 43(9):503-11. PubMed ID: 26820007
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A digital frame of reference for viewing digital images.
    Brettle DS
    Br J Radiol; 2001 Jan; 74(877):69-72. PubMed ID: 11227780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Diagnostic accuracy of conventional and digital radiography for detecting misfit between the tooth and restoration in metal-restored teeth.
    Liedke GS; Spin-Neto R; Vizzotto MB; Da Silveira PF; Silveira HE; Wenzel A
    J Prosthet Dent; 2015 Jan; 113(1):39-47. PubMed ID: 25311793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A comparison of perceived diagnostic image quality in direct digital panoramic images between standard and advanced external GOP image processing.
    Svenson B; Båth M; Karlsson R; Persson B
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2019 Nov; 77(8):560-565. PubMed ID: 31146623
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimization of exposure in panoramic radiography while maintaining image quality using adaptive filtering.
    Svenson B; Larsson L; Båth M
    Acta Odontol Scand; 2016; 74(3):229-35. PubMed ID: 26478956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Dental digital radiography.
    Moore WS
    Tex Dent J; 2002 May; 119(5):404-12. PubMed ID: 12046403
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Digital subtraction radiography in artificial recurrent caries detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Martinez TS; Matteson SR; McDavid WD; Dove SB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1992 May; 21(2):59-64. PubMed ID: 1397457
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Sliding window adaptive histogram equalization of intraoral radiographs: effect on image quality.
    Sund T; Møystad A
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 May; 35(3):133-8. PubMed ID: 16618843
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Effects of the automatic exposure compensation on the proximal caries diagnosis.
    Yoshiura K; Nakayama E; Shimizu M; Goto TK; Chikui T; Kawazu T; Okamura K
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2005 May; 34(3):140-4. PubMed ID: 15897283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Utility and effectiveness of computer-aided diagnosis of dental caries.
    Tracy KD; Dykstra BA; Gakenheimer DC; Scheetz JP; Lacina S; Scarfe WC; Farman AG
    Gen Dent; 2011; 59(2):136-44. PubMed ID: 21903524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Diagnostic accuracy of two software modalities for detection of caries lesions in digital radiographs from four dental systems.
    Hintze H
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2006 Mar; 35(2):78-82. PubMed ID: 16549433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital radiography: the standard of care.
    Samaras CD
    Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Oct; 29(8):506, 508-9. PubMed ID: 18935789
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of different exposure values on diagnostic accuracy of digital images.
    Pfeiffer P; Schmage P; Nergiz I; Platzer U
    Quintessence Int; 2000 Apr; 31(4):257-60. PubMed ID: 11203933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The digital revolution, images and X-rays.
    Emmott LF
    N Y State Dent J; 2005 Jan; 71(1):40-3. PubMed ID: 15768910
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Interaction between noise and file compression and its effect on the recognition of caries in digital imaging.
    Janhom A; van der Stelt PF; van Ginkel FC
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2000 Jan; 29(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 10654032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Digital enhancement of radiographs for assessment of interproximal dental caries.
    Seneadza V; Koob A; Kaltschmitt J; Staehle HJ; Duwenhoegger J; Eickholz P
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2008 Mar; 37(3):142-8. PubMed ID: 18316505
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Detection of approximal caries in digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and visual response. An in vitro study.
    Li G; Yoshiura K; Welander U; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2002 Mar; 31(2):113-6. PubMed ID: 12076051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.