These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21869791)

  • 41. [A comparison between endoral radiography and electronic magnification of digital orthopantomography].
    Nessi R; Lazzerini F; Minorati D; Blanc M; Uslenghi CM
    Radiol Med; 1995 Sep; 90(3):226-31. PubMed ID: 7501826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Diagnostic utility of thermal printed panographs compared with corresponding computer monitor images.
    Guerrant GH; Moore WS; Murchison DF
    Gen Dent; 2001; 49(2):190-6; quiz 197-8. PubMed ID: 12004700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Effect of digital filtering on the measurement of the depth of proximal caries under different exposure conditions.
    Koob A; Sanden E; Hassfeld S; Staehle HJ; Eickholz P
    Am J Dent; 2004 Dec; 17(6):388-93. PubMed ID: 15724747
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. The effects of restorative material and location on the detection of simulated recurrent caries. A comparison of dental film, direct digital radiography and tuned aperture computed tomography.
    Nair MK; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB; May K; Ye F
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1998 Mar; 27(2):80-4. PubMed ID: 9656871
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. [Loss of image quality due to the image output of a digital radiographic system].
    Jungnickel K; Redlich U
    Z Med Phys; 2009; 19(1):67-72. PubMed ID: 19459587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. [Digital subtraction technique in dentistry].
    Bottenberg P; Truyen B; Boca C
    Rev Belge Med Dent (1984); 2007; 62(1):25-32. PubMed ID: 18506962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Evaluation of a new digital panoramic system: a comparison with film.
    Ramesh A; Tyndall DA; Ludlow JB
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2001 Mar; 30(2):98-100. PubMed ID: 11313729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Perceptibility curve test for digital radiographs before and after correction for attenuation and correction for attenuation and visual response.
    Li G; Welander U; Yoshiura K; Shi XQ; McDavid WD
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):372-8. PubMed ID: 15070839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Discrimination between restorative dental materials by their radiopacity measured in film radiographs and digital images.
    Wenzel A; Hintze H; Hørsted-Bindslev P
    J Forensic Odontostomatol; 1998 Jun; 16(1):8-13. PubMed ID: 9922755
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Computer-assisted orientation of dental periapical radiographs to the occlusal plane.
    Huang CH; Hsu CY
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2008 May; 105(5):649-53. PubMed ID: 18296083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. The subjective image quality of direct digital and conventional panoramic radiography.
    Gijbels F; De Meyer AM; Bou Serhal C; Van den Bossche C; Declerck J; Persoons M; Jacobs R
    Clin Oral Investig; 2000 Sep; 4(3):162-7. PubMed ID: 11000322
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. [Medical image enhancement: Sharpening].
    Kats L; Vered M
    Refuat Hapeh Vehashinayim (1993); 2015 Apr; 32(2):10-2, 36. PubMed ID: 26255429
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Metal artifacts from posterior mandibular implants as seen in CBCT.
    Naitoh M; Saburi K; Gotoh K; Kurita K; Ariji E
    Implant Dent; 2013 Apr; 22(2):151-4. PubMed ID: 23399788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Performance of digital radiography with enhancement filters for the diagnosis of proximal caries.
    Belém MD; Ambrosano GM; Tabchoury CP; Ferreira-Santos RI; Haiter-Neto F
    Braz Oral Res; 2013; 27(3):245-51. PubMed ID: 23739784
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Validation of a dental image analyzer tool to measure alveolar bone loss in periodontitis patients.
    Teeuw WJ; Coelho L; Silva A; van der Palen CJ; Lessmann FG; van der Velden U; Loos BG
    J Periodontal Res; 2009 Feb; 44(1):94-102. PubMed ID: 18973543
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Comparative investigation of subjective image quality of digital intraoral radiographs processed with 3 image-processing algorithms.
    Li G
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Jun; 97(6):762-7. PubMed ID: 15184861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Comparison of complementary metal oxide semiconductor and charge-coupled device intraoral X-ray detectors using subjective image quality.
    Kitagawa H; Scheetz JP; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2003 Nov; 32(6):408-11. PubMed ID: 15070845
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Two- versus three-dimensional imaging in subjects with unerupted maxillary canines.
    Botticelli S; Verna C; Cattaneo PM; Heidmann J; Melsen B
    Eur J Orthod; 2011 Aug; 33(4):344-9. PubMed ID: 21131389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Digital transversal slice imaging in dental-maxillofacial radiology: from pantomography to digital volume tomography.
    Fuhrmann A; Schulze D; Rother U; Vesper M
    Int J Comput Dent; 2003 Apr; 6(2):129-40. PubMed ID: 14552150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Detection of artificial occlusal caries in a phosphor imaging plate system with two types of LCD monitors versus three different films.
    Ilgüy M; Dinçer S; Ilgüy D; Bayirli G
    J Digit Imaging; 2009 Jun; 22(3):242-9. PubMed ID: 18949518
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.