These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

173 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21870192)

  • 1. Conjoint analysis versus rating and ranking for values elicitation and clarification in colorectal cancer screening.
    Pignone MP; Brenner AT; Hawley S; Sheridan SL; Lewis CL; Jonas DE; Howard K
    J Gen Intern Med; 2012 Jan; 27(1):45-50. PubMed ID: 21870192
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparing 3 values clarification methods for colorectal cancer screening decision-making: a randomized trial in the US and Australia.
    Brenner A; Howard K; Lewis C; Sheridan S; Crutchfield T; Hawley S; Reuland D; Kistler C; Pignone M
    J Gen Intern Med; 2014 Mar; 29(3):507-13. PubMed ID: 24272830
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Comparing 3 techniques for eliciting patient values for decision making about prostate-specific antigen screening: a randomized controlled trial.
    Pignone MP; Howard K; Brenner AT; Crutchfield TM; Hawley ST; Lewis CL; Sheridan SL
    JAMA Intern Med; 2013 Mar; 173(5):362-8. PubMed ID: 23400279
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Using a discrete choice experiment to inform the design of programs to promote colon cancer screening for vulnerable populations in North Carolina.
    Pignone MP; Crutchfield TM; Brown PM; Hawley ST; Laping JL; Lewis CL; Lich KH; Richardson LC; Tangka FK; Wheeler SB
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2014 Nov; 14():611. PubMed ID: 25433801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Attributes in stated preference elicitation studies on colorectal cancer screening and their relative importance for decision-making among screenees: a systematic review.
    Brinkmann M; Fricke LM; Diedrich L; Robra BP; Krauth C; Dreier M
    Health Econ Rev; 2022 Sep; 12(1):49. PubMed ID: 36136248
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Survival or Mortality: Does Risk Attribute Framing Influence Decision-Making Behavior in a Discrete Choice Experiment?
    Veldwijk J; Essers BA; Lambooij MS; Dirksen CD; Smit HA; de Wit GA
    Value Health; 2016; 19(2):202-9. PubMed ID: 27021754
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Older adults' preferences for colorectal cancer-screening test attributes and test choice.
    Kistler CE; Hess TM; Howard K; Pignone MP; Crutchfield TM; Hawley ST; Brenner AT; Ward KT; Lewis CL
    Patient Prefer Adherence; 2015; 9():1005-16. PubMed ID: 26203233
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Eliciting public preferences for healthcare: a systematic review of techniques.
    Ryan M; Scott DA; Reeves C; Bate A; van Teijlingen ER; Russell EM; Napper M; Robb CM
    Health Technol Assess; 2001; 5(5):1-186. PubMed ID: 11262422
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. A Decision Aid to Promote Appropriate Colorectal Cancer Screening among Older Adults: A Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Lewis CL; Kistler CE; Dalton AF; Morris C; Ferrari R; Barclay C; Brewer NT; Dolor R; Harris R; Vu M; Golin CE
    Med Decis Making; 2018 Jul; 38(5):614-624. PubMed ID: 29847251
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Association of Race and Socioeconomic Status With Colorectal Cancer Screening, Colorectal Cancer Risk, and Mortality in Southern US Adults.
    Warren Andersen S; Blot WJ; Lipworth L; Steinwandel M; Murff HJ; Zheng W
    JAMA Netw Open; 2019 Dec; 2(12):e1917995. PubMed ID: 31860105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Understanding the Preferences and Considerations of the Public Towards Risk-Stratified Screening for Colorectal Cancer: Insights From Think-Aloud Interviews Based on a Discrete Choice Experiment.
    Dennison RA; Clune RJ; Morris S; Thomas C; Usher-Smith JA
    Health Expect; 2024 Aug; 27(4):e14153. PubMed ID: 39030943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Changes in the choice of colorectal cancer screening tests in primary care settings from 7,845 prospectively collected surveys.
    Wong MC; John GK; Hirai HW; Lam TY; Luk AK; Ching JY; Ng SS; Chan FK; Griffiths SM; Sung JJ
    Cancer Causes Control; 2012 Sep; 23(9):1541-8. PubMed ID: 22836914
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Eliciting Patient Preferences for Hepatocellular Carcinoma Screening: A Choice-Based Conjoint Analysis.
    Fazeli S; Covarrubias Y; Bassirian S; Cuevas J; Fowler K; Vodkin I; Kono Y; Marks R; Loomba R; Taouli B; Sirlin C; Carlos R
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2022 Apr; 19(4):502-512. PubMed ID: 35248523
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Eliciting population preferences for mass colorectal cancer screening organization.
    Nayaradou M; Berchi C; Dejardin O; Launoy G
    Med Decis Making; 2010; 30(2):224-33. PubMed ID: 19692710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Assessing stated preferences for colorectal cancer screening: a critical systematic review of discrete choice experiments.
    Wortley S; Wong G; Kieu A; Howard K
    Patient; 2014; 7(3):271-82. PubMed ID: 24652475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Randomized trial of presenting absolute v. relative risk reduction in the elicitation of patient values for heart disease prevention with conjoint analysis.
    Griffith JM; Lewis CL; Hawley S; Sheridan SL; Pignone MP
    Med Decis Making; 2009; 29(2):167-74. PubMed ID: 19279298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Self-perceived Mental Health Status and Uptake of Fecal Occult Blood Test for Colorectal Cancer Screening in Canada: A Cross-Sectional Study.
    Hategekimana C; Karamouzian M
    Int J Health Policy Manag; 2016 Feb; 5(6):365-71. PubMed ID: 27285514
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Preferences for colorectal cancer screening strategies: a discrete choice experiment.
    Hol L; de Bekker-Grob EW; van Dam L; Donkers B; Kuipers EJ; Habbema JD; Steyerberg EW; van Leerdam ME; Essink-Bot ML
    Br J Cancer; 2010 Mar; 102(6):972-80. PubMed ID: 20197766
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of Rating Scale, Time Tradeoff, and Conjoint Analysis Methods for Assessment of Preferences in Prostate Cancer.
    Kaplan RM; Crespi CM; Dahan E; Saucedo JD; Pagan C; Saigal CS
    Med Decis Making; 2019 Oct; 39(7):816-826. PubMed ID: 31556793
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. An empirical comparison of methods for analyzing correlated data from a discrete choice survey to elicit patient preference for colorectal cancer screening.
    Cheng J; Pullenayegum E; Marshall DA; Marshall JK; Thabane L
    BMC Med Res Methodol; 2012 Feb; 12():15. PubMed ID: 22348526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.