228 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21870615)
1. Using the negative binomial distribution to model overdispersion in ecological count data.
Lindén A; Mäntyniemi S
Ecology; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1414-21. PubMed ID: 21870615
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. On performance of parametric and distribution-free models for zero-inflated and over-dispersed count responses.
Tang W; Lu N; Chen T; Wang W; Gunzler DD; Han Y; Tu XM
Stat Med; 2015 Oct; 34(24):3235-45. PubMed ID: 26078035
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparative assessment of parameter estimation methods in the presence of overdispersion: a simulation study.
Roosa K; Luo R; Chowell G
Math Biosci Eng; 2019 May; 16(5):4299-4313. PubMed ID: 31499663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. A comparison of observation-level random effect and Beta-Binomial models for modelling overdispersion in Binomial data in ecology & evolution.
Harrison XA
PeerJ; 2015; 3():e1114. PubMed ID: 26244118
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Marginal modeling in community randomized trials with rare events: Utilization of the negative binomial regression model.
Westgate PM; Cheng DM; Feaster DJ; Fernández S; Shoben AB; Vandergrift N
Clin Trials; 2022 Apr; 19(2):162-171. PubMed ID: 34991359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Approaches for dealing with various sources of overdispersion in modeling count data: Scale adjustment versus modeling.
Payne EH; Hardin JW; Egede LE; Ramakrishnan V; Selassie A; Gebregziabher M
Stat Methods Med Res; 2017 Aug; 26(4):1802-1823. PubMed ID: 26031359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Testing the odds of inherent vs. observed overdispersion in neural spike counts.
Taouali W; Benvenuti G; Wallisch P; Chavane F; Perrinet LU
J Neurophysiol; 2016 Jan; 115(1):434-44. PubMed ID: 26445864
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Marginalized multilevel hurdle and zero-inflated models for overdispersed and correlated count data with excess zeros.
Kassahun W; Neyens T; Molenberghs G; Faes C; Verbeke G
Stat Med; 2014 Nov; 33(25):4402-19. PubMed ID: 24957791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Count data distributions and their zero-modified equivalents as a framework for modelling microbial data with a relatively high occurrence of zero counts.
Gonzales-Barron U; Kerr M; Sheridan JJ; Butler F
Int J Food Microbiol; 2010 Jan; 136(3):268-77. PubMed ID: 19913934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Estimating the effects of detection heterogeneity and overdispersion on trends estimated from avian point counts.
Etterson MA; Niemi GJ; Danz NP
Ecol Appl; 2009 Dec; 19(8):2049-66. PubMed ID: 20014578
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Modelling overdispersion and Markovian features in count data.
Trocóniz IF; Plan EL; Miller R; Karlsson MO
J Pharmacokinet Pharmacodyn; 2009 Oct; 36(5):461-77. PubMed ID: 19798550
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. [Application of detecting and taking overdispersion into account in Poisson regression model].
Bouche G; Lepage B; Migeot V; Ingrand P
Rev Epidemiol Sante Publique; 2009 Aug; 57(4):285-96. PubMed ID: 19540683
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. [Negative binomial distribution versus Poisson in the analysis of recurrent phenomena].
Navarro A; Utzet F; Puig P; Caminal J; Martín M
Gac Sanit; 2001; 15(5):447-52. PubMed ID: 11734158
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Selecting the right statistical model for analysis of insect count data by using information theoretic measures.
Sileshi G
Bull Entomol Res; 2006 Oct; 96(5):479-88. PubMed ID: 17092359
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Quasi-Poisson vs. negative binomial regression: how should we model overdispersed count data?
Ver Hoef JM; Boveng PL
Ecology; 2007 Nov; 88(11):2766-72. PubMed ID: 18051645
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Testing approaches for overdispersion in poisson regression versus the generalized poisson model.
Yang Z; Hardin JW; Addy CL; Vuong QH
Biom J; 2007 Aug; 49(4):565-84. PubMed ID: 17638291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Application of negative binomial modeling for discrete outcomes: a case study in aging research.
Byers AL; Allore H; Gill TM; Peduzzi PN
J Clin Epidemiol; 2003 Jun; 56(6):559-64. PubMed ID: 12873651
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Characterizing the empirical distribution of prokaryotic genome n-mers in the presence of nullomers.
Tabb LP; Zhao W; Huang J; Rosen GL
J Comput Biol; 2014 Oct; 21(10):732-40. PubMed ID: 25075627
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. The analysis of incontinence episodes and other count data in patients with overactive bladder by Poisson and negative binomial regression.
Martina R; Kay R; van Maanen R; Ridder A
Pharm Stat; 2015; 14(2):151-60. PubMed ID: 25524209
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Comparing methods for analyzing overdispersed count data in aquatic toxicology.
Noe DA; Bailer AJ; Noble RB
Environ Toxicol Chem; 2010 Jan; 29(1):212-9. PubMed ID: 20821437
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
