These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21870617)

  • 1. Inference about density and temporary emigration in unmarked populations.
    Chandler RB; Royle JA; King DI
    Ecology; 2011 Jul; 92(7):1429-35. PubMed ID: 21870617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Hierarchical distance-sampling models to estimate population size and habitat-specific abundance of an island endemic.
    Sillett TS; Chandler RB; Royle JA; Kery M; Morrison SA
    Ecol Appl; 2012 Oct; 22(7):1997-2006. PubMed ID: 23210315
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impact of density and environmental factors on population fluctuations in a migratory passerine.
    Pasinelli G; Schaub M; Häfliger G; Frey M; Jakober H; Müller M; Stauber W; Tryjanowski P; Zollinger JL; Jenni L
    J Anim Ecol; 2011 Jan; 80(1):225-34. PubMed ID: 21039479
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Partitioning detectability components in populations subject to within-season temporary emigration using binomial mixture models.
    O'Donnell KM; Thompson FR; Semlitsch RD
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(3):e0117216. PubMed ID: 25775182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Population size and stopover duration estimation using mark-resight data and Bayesian analysis of a superpopulation model.
    Lyons JE; Kendall WL; Royle JA; Converse SJ; Andres BA; Buchanan JB
    Biometrics; 2016 Mar; 72(1):262-71. PubMed ID: 26348116
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of camera trap-based abundance estimators for unmarked populations.
    Amburgey SM; Yackel Adams AA; Gardner B; Hostetter NJ; Siers SR; McClintock BT; Converse SJ
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Oct; 31(7):e02410. PubMed ID: 34255398
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Assessing the robustness of time-to-event models for estimating unmarked wildlife abundance using remote cameras.
    Loonam KE; Lukacs PM; Ausband DE; Mitchell MS; Robinson HS
    Ecol Appl; 2021 Sep; 31(6):e02388. PubMed ID: 34156123
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Improving aquatic warbler population assessments by accounting for imperfect detection.
    Oppel S; Marczakiewicz P; Lachmann L; Grzywaczewski G
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(4):e94406. PubMed ID: 24713994
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Modeling Systematic Change in Stopover Duration Does Not Improve Bias in Trends Estimated from Migration Counts.
    Crewe TL; Taylor PD; Lepage D
    PLoS One; 2015; 10(6):e0130137. PubMed ID: 26086796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. A hierarchical model for spatial capture-recapture data.
    Royle JA; Young KV
    Ecology; 2008 Aug; 89(8):2281-9. PubMed ID: 18724738
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Bayesian state-space formulation of dynamic occupancy models.
    Royle JA; Kéry M
    Ecology; 2007 Jul; 88(7):1813-23. PubMed ID: 17645027
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Simultaneous-count models to estimate abundance from counts of unmarked individuals with imperfect detection.
    Ryan GE; Nicholson E; Eames JC; Gray TNE; Loveridge R; Mahood SP; Sum P; McCarthy MA
    Conserv Biol; 2019 Jun; 33(3):697-708. PubMed ID: 30615823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A novel application of multi-event modeling to estimate class segregation in a highly migratory oceanic vertebrate.
    Chapple TK; Chambert T; Kanive PE; Jorgensen SJ; Rotella JJ; Anderson SD; Carlisle AB; Block BA
    Ecology; 2016 Dec; 97(12):3494-3502. PubMed ID: 27912002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Efficient estimation of abundance for patchily distributed populations via two-phase, adaptive sampling.
    Conroy MJ; Runge JP; Barker RJ; Schofield MR; Fonnesbeck CJ
    Ecology; 2008 Dec; 89(12):3362-70. PubMed ID: 19137943
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. ENSO, nest predation risk, food abundance, and male status fail to explain annual variations in the apparent survival rate of a migratory songbird.
    Vernouillet A; Villard MA; Haché S
    PLoS One; 2014; 9(11):e113844. PubMed ID: 25419839
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Precision of systematic and random sampling in clustered populations: habitat patches and aggregating organisms.
    McGarvey R; Burch P; Matthews JM
    Ecol Appl; 2016 Jan; 26(1):233-48. PubMed ID: 27039522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fidelity and breeding probability related to population density and individual quality in black brent geese Branta bernicla nigricans.
    Sedinger JS; Chelgren ND; Ward DH; Lindberg MS
    J Anim Ecol; 2008 Jul; 77(4):702-12. PubMed ID: 18479339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Hierarchical modelling and estimation of abundance and population trends in metapopulation designs.
    Kéry M; Andrew Royle J
    J Anim Ecol; 2010 Mar; 79(2):453-61. PubMed ID: 19886893
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Fractal dimension of birds population sizes time series.
    Garmendia A; Salvador A
    Math Biosci; 2007 Mar; 206(1):155-71. PubMed ID: 16185719
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Identifying key demographic parameters of a small island-associated population of Indo-Pacific bottlenose dolphins (Reunion, Indian Ocean).
    Dulau V; Estrade V; Fayan J
    PLoS One; 2017; 12(6):e0179780. PubMed ID: 28640918
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.