These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

85 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21870864)

  • 1. Solvent interaction energy calculations on molecular dynamics trajectories: increasing the efficiency using systematic frame selection.
    Lill MA; Thompson JJ
    J Chem Inf Model; 2011 Oct; 51(10):2680-9. PubMed ID: 21870864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Accounting for the Central Role of Interfacial Water in Protein-Ligand Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Ben-Shalom IY; Lin Z; Radak BK; Lin C; Sherman W; Gilson MK
    J Chem Theory Comput; 2020 Dec; 16(12):7883-7894. PubMed ID: 33206520
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Automation of absolute protein-ligand binding free energy calculations for docking refinement and compound evaluation.
    Heinzelmann G; Gilson MK
    Sci Rep; 2021 Jan; 11(1):1116. PubMed ID: 33441879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Screening Power of End-Point Free-Energy Calculations in Cucurbituril Host-Guest Systems.
    Liu X; Zheng L; Qin C; Li Y; Zhang JZH; Sun Z
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Nov; 63(21):6938-6946. PubMed ID: 37908066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. On Analytical Corrections for Restraints in Absolute Binding Free Energy Calculations.
    Boresch S
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(9):3605-3609. PubMed ID: 38640478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Rapid, accurate, precise and reproducible ligand-protein binding free energy prediction.
    Wan S; Bhati AP; Zasada SJ; Coveney PV
    Interface Focus; 2020 Dec; 10(6):20200007. PubMed ID: 33178418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7.
    Santana OL; Silva DG; Santana SR
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 May; 64(9):3767-3778. PubMed ID: 38621228
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Quantifying the effects of lossy compression on energies calculated from molecular dynamics trajectories.
    Roe DR; Brooks BR
    Protein Sci; 2022 Dec; 31(12):e4511. PubMed ID: 36382864
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Large-Scale Molecular Dynamics Simulation Based on Heterogeneous Many-Core Architecture.
    Zhou X; Wei Z; Lu H; He J; Gao Y; Hu X; Wang C; Dong Y; Liu H
    J Chem Inf Model; 2024 Feb; 64(3):851-861. PubMed ID: 38299978
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Ensemble-Based Approaches Ensure Reliability and Reproducibility.
    Wan S; Bhati AP; Wade AD; Coveney PV
    J Chem Inf Model; 2023 Nov; 63(22):6959-6963. PubMed ID: 37965695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. First report on chemometrics-driven multilayered lead prioritization in addressing oxysterol-mediated overexpression of G protein-coupled receptor 183.
    Bhattacharjee A; Kar S; Ojha PK
    Mol Divers; 2024 Mar; ():. PubMed ID: 38460065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Dissecting the Structural Dynamics of Authentic Cholesteryl Ester Transfer Protein for the Discovery of Potential Lead Compounds: A Theoretical Study.
    Zhao Y; Hao D; Zhao Y; Zhang S; Zhang L; Yang Z
    Int J Mol Sci; 2023 Jul; 24(15):. PubMed ID: 37569628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Assessment of mutations on RBD in the Spike protein of SARS-CoV-2 Alpha, Delta and Omicron variants.
    da Costa CHS; de Freitas CAB; Alves CN; Lameira J
    Sci Rep; 2022 May; 12(1):8540. PubMed ID: 35595778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Structural, energetic and lipophilic analysis of SARS-CoV-2 non-structural protein 9 (NSP9).
    de O Araújo J; Pinheiro S; Zamora WJ; Alves CN; Lameira J; Lima AH
    Sci Rep; 2021 Nov; 11(1):23003. PubMed ID: 34837010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Cyclic Peptide Inhibitors of the Tsg101 UEV Protein Interactions Refined through Global Docking and Gaussian Accelerated Molecular Dynamics Simulations.
    Lin WW; Wang YJ; Ko CW; Cheng TL; Wang YT
    Polymers (Basel); 2020 Sep; 12(10):. PubMed ID: 32998394
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Structure-Based Virtual Screening, Molecular Dynamics and Binding Free Energy Calculations of Hit Candidates as ALK-5 Inhibitors.
    Araujo SC; Maltarollo VG; Almeida MO; Ferreira LLG; Andricopulo AD; Honorio KM
    Molecules; 2020 Jan; 25(2):. PubMed ID: 31936488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Ponatinib is a pan-BCR-ABL kinase inhibitor: MD simulations and SIE study.
    Tanneeru K; Guruprasad L
    PLoS One; 2013; 8(11):e78556. PubMed ID: 24236021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Molecular recognition in a diverse set of protein-ligand interactions studied with molecular dynamics simulations and end-point free energy calculations.
    Wang B; Li L; Hurley TD; Meroueh SO
    J Chem Inf Model; 2013 Oct; 53(10):2659-70. PubMed ID: 24032517
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Variability in docking success rates due to dataset preparation.
    Corbeil CR; Williams CI; Labute P
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 Jun; 26(6):775-86. PubMed ID: 22566074
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Exhaustive search and solvated interaction energy (SIE) for virtual screening and affinity prediction.
    Sulea T; Hogues H; Purisima EO
    J Comput Aided Mol Des; 2012 May; 26(5):617-33. PubMed ID: 22198519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.