These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21870989)

  • 41. Single embryo transfer in clinical practice.
    Hydén-Granskog C; Tiitinen A
    Hum Fertil (Camb); 2004 Sep; 7(3):175-82. PubMed ID: 15590571
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Impact of the Spanish Fertility Society guidelines on the number of embryos to transfer.
    Cabello Y; Gómez-Palomares JL; Castilla JA; Hernández J; Marqueta J; Pareja A; Luceño F; Hernández E; Coroleu B
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2010 Nov; 21(5):667-75. PubMed ID: 20888295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Ethical application of Shared Risk programs in assisted reproductive technology.
    Levens ED; Levy MJ
    Fertil Steril; 2011 Jun; 95(7):2198-9. PubMed ID: 21601666
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. On the cost and prevention of iatrogenic multiple pregnancies.
    Allen BD; Adashi EY; Jones HW
    Reprod Biomed Online; 2014 Sep; 29(3):281-5. PubMed ID: 24934626
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Refuting a misguided campaign against the goal of single-embryo transfer and singleton birth in assisted reproduction.
    Stillman RJ; Richter KS; Jones HW
    Hum Reprod; 2013 Oct; 28(10):2599-607. PubMed ID: 23904468
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. World collaborative report on Assisted Reproductive Technology, 2002.
    ; de Mouzon J; Lancaster P; Nygren KG; Sullivan E; Zegers-Hochschild F; Mansour R; Ishihara O; Adamson D
    Hum Reprod; 2009 Sep; 24(9):2310-20. PubMed ID: 19474459
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Hospital costs of multiple-birth and singleton-birth children during the first 5 years of life and the role of assisted reproductive technology.
    Chambers GM; Hoang VP; Lee E; Hansen M; Sullivan EA; Bower C; Chapman M
    JAMA Pediatr; 2014 Nov; 168(11):1045-53. PubMed ID: 25222633
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Costs of medically assisted reproduction treatment at specialized fertility clinics in the Danish public health care system: results from a 5-year follow-up cohort study.
    Christiansen T; Erb K; Rizvanovic A; Ziebe S; Mikkelsen Englund AL; Hald F; Boivin J; Schmidt L
    Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand; 2014 Jan; 93(1):64-72. PubMed ID: 24266525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. [Against the obligation of single embryo transfer].
    Merviel P; Lourdel E; Cabry R; Grenier N; Sanguinet P; Henry I; Brasseur F; Copin H
    Gynecol Obstet Fertil; 2007 May; 35(5):474-9. PubMed ID: 17398139
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Defining success in multiple birth.
    Keith Hall N; Keith DM
    Twin Res; 2003 Dec; 6(6):543-5. PubMed ID: 14979300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Fertility treatments and multiple births in the United States.
    Kulkarni AD; Jamieson DJ; Jones HW; Kissin DM; Gallo MF; Macaluso M; Adashi EY
    N Engl J Med; 2013 Dec; 369(23):2218-25. PubMed ID: 24304051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Neonatal outcome following new assisted reproductive technology regulations in Turkey - a nationwide multicenter point prevalence study.
    Kultursay N; Yalaz M; Koroglu OA;
    J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med; 2015 Jan; 28(2):204-9. PubMed ID: 24670237
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. A Managed Care Consensus statement on contraception and women's health.
    Managed Care Women's Health Consensus Working Group
    Manag Care Interface; 2006; 19 Suppl A():15-20. PubMed ID: 16786989
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. The public health implications of assisted reproductive technologies.
    Deonandan R
    Chronic Dis Can; 2010 Sep; 30(4):119-24. PubMed ID: 20946712
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Infertility, assisted reproductive technology, and adverse pregnancy outcomes: executive summary of a National Institute of Child Health and Human Development workshop.
    Reddy UM; Wapner RJ; Rebar RW; Tasca RJ
    Obstet Gynecol; 2007 Apr; 109(4):967-77. PubMed ID: 17400861
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Why we should all pay for fertility treatment: an argument from ethics and policy.
    Johnston J; Gusmano MK
    Hastings Cent Rep; 2013; 43(2):18-21. PubMed ID: 23494699
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Insurance mandates and trends in infertility treatments.
    Henne MB; Bundorf MK
    Fertil Steril; 2008 Jan; 89(1):66-73. PubMed ID: 17482603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. 6. Ethical issues related to multiple pregnancies in medically assisted procreation.
    ESHRE Task Force on Ethics and Law
    Hum Reprod; 2003 Sep; 18(9):1976-9. PubMed ID: 12923160
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Universal coverage of IVF pays off.
    Vélez MP; Connolly MP; Kadoch IJ; Phillips S; Bissonnette F
    Hum Reprod; 2014 Jun; 29(6):1313-9. PubMed ID: 24706002
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Adverse perinatal events associated with ART.
    Skora D; Frankfurter D
    Semin Reprod Med; 2012 Apr; 30(2):84-91. PubMed ID: 22549708
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.