These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

143 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 21871040)

  • 1. Improving health care outcomes through personalized comparisons of treatment effectiveness based on electronic health records.
    Hoffman S; Podgurski A
    J Law Med Ethics; 2011; 39(3):425-36. PubMed ID: 21871040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part I. Basic considerations.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):E23-54. PubMed ID: 20119474
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. CER Hub: An informatics platform for conducting comparative effectiveness research using multi-institutional, heterogeneous, electronic clinical data.
    Hazlehurst BL; Kurtz SE; Masica A; Stevens VJ; McBurnie MA; Puro JE; Vijayadeva V; Au DH; Brannon ED; Sittig DF
    Int J Med Inform; 2015 Oct; 84(10):763-73. PubMed ID: 26138036
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Comparative effectiveness research: Policy context, methods development and research infrastructure.
    Tunis SR; Benner J; McClellan M
    Stat Med; 2010 Aug; 29(19):1963-76. PubMed ID: 20564311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Facts, fallacies, and politics of comparative effectiveness research: Part 2 - implications for interventional pain management.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Boswell MV; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2010; 13(1):E55-79. PubMed ID: 20119475
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. The ISPOR Good Practices for Quality Improvement of Cost-Effectiveness Research Task Force Report.
    McGhan WF; Al M; Doshi JA; Kamae I; Marx SE; Rindress D
    Value Health; 2009; 12(8):1086-99. PubMed ID: 19744291
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The impact of comparative effectiveness research on interventional pain management: evolution from Medicare Modernization Act to Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act and the Patient-Centered Outcomes Research Institute.
    Manchikanti L; Falco FJ; Benyamin RM; Helm S; Parr AT; Hirsch JA
    Pain Physician; 2011; 14(3):E249-82. PubMed ID: 21587337
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. VisualDecisionLinc: a visual analytics approach for comparative effectiveness-based clinical decision support in psychiatry.
    Mane KK; Bizon C; Schmitt C; Owen P; Burchett B; Pietrobon R; Gersing K
    J Biomed Inform; 2012 Feb; 45(1):101-6. PubMed ID: 21963813
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Integration of Genomics in Primary Care.
    Larson EA; Wilke RA
    Am J Med; 2015 Nov; 128(11):1251.e1-5. PubMed ID: 26031886
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparative effectiveness research, genomics-enabled personalized medicine, and rapid learning health care: a common bond.
    Ginsburg GS; Kuderer NM
    J Clin Oncol; 2012 Dec; 30(34):4233-42. PubMed ID: 23071236
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. It is important to note that RWD will never replace the more traditional and more robust RCT data; however, the emerging trend is to incorporate data that are more generalizable. Introduction.
    Mullins CD; Sanchez RJ
    J Manag Care Pharm; 2011; 17(9 Suppl A):S03-4. PubMed ID: 22074667
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparative Effectiveness Research Through a Collaborative Electronic Reporting Consortium.
    Fiks AG; Grundmeier RW; Steffes J; Adams WG; Kaelber DC; Pace WD; Wasserman RC;
    Pediatrics; 2015 Jul; 136(1):e215-24. PubMed ID: 26101357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Comparative effectiveness research and personalized medicine: catalyzing or colliding?
    Epstein RS; Teagarden JR
    Pharmacoeconomics; 2010; 28(10):905-13. PubMed ID: 20831298
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measure once, cut twice--adding patient-reported outcome measures to the electronic health record for comparative effectiveness research.
    Wu AW; Kharrazi H; Boulware LE; Snyder CF
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2013 Aug; 66(8 Suppl):S12-20. PubMed ID: 23849145
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The use of patient-reported outcomes (PRO) within comparative effectiveness research: implications for clinical practice and health care policy.
    Ahmed S; Berzon RA; Revicki DA; Lenderking WR; Moinpour CM; Basch E; Reeve BB; Wu AW;
    Med Care; 2012 Dec; 50(12):1060-70. PubMed ID: 22922434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A novel approach to generating CER hypotheses based on mining clinical data.
    Zhang S; Li L; Yu Y; Sun X; Xu L; Zhao W; Teng X; Pan Y
    Stud Health Technol Inform; 2013; 192():991. PubMed ID: 23920765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Harnessing electronic healthcare data for wound care research: Standards for reporting observational registry data obtained directly from electronic health records.
    Fife CE; Eckert KA
    Wound Repair Regen; 2017 Apr; 25(2):192-209. PubMed ID: 28370796
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evidence-based medicine in health care reform.
    Hughes GB
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2011 Oct; 145(4):526-9. PubMed ID: 21860057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Creating a high-performance system for comparative effectiveness research.
    Etheredge LM
    Health Aff (Millwood); 2010 Oct; 29(10):1761-7. PubMed ID: 20921473
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Decision support tools to optimize economic outcomes for type 2 diabetes.
    Shaya FT; Chirikov VV
    Am J Manag Care; 2011 Nov; 17 Suppl 14():S377-83. PubMed ID: 22214425
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.